1 / 28

JOUR 484 Sociology of Journalism

JOUR 484 Sociology of Journalism. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting and Framing Theory Metin Ersoy F aculty of Communication and Media Studies. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing. Have you ever thought about what you think and why you think? Why we focus on some issues but not something else?

sydney
Télécharger la présentation

JOUR 484 Sociology of Journalism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JOUR 484Sociology of Journalism Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting and Framing Theory Metin Ersoy Faculty of Communication andMediaStudies

  2. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Have you ever thought about what you think and why you think? • Why we focus on some issues but not something else? • Is there any relationship between what you think and what media says to us? • If so, why? If not, then, what are the impacts of the media on our daily lives? Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  3. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Walter Lipmann, American journalist and social commsentator, was the first who realised the importance of the media and our way of thinking. • In his book, Public Opinion (1922), Lipmann argued that “mass media, primarily newspapers and magazines… create our picture of the world” (McCombs & Bell, 94). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  4. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • The Beginnings • In 1968, McCombs & Shaw, from the University of North Carolina, conducted a research during the presidential elections. • Their research was the first research depending on Lipmann’s thesis. • The research conducted in Chapel Hill. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  5. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • The main issue in Chapel Hill study (1968) was salience. • What is salience? • Salience means “whether or not something is perceived as important or prominent” (McCombs & Bell, 95). • The question of “what do you think is the most important problem facing this country [the US] today?” has changed by McCombs & Shaw. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  6. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • During the presidential election McCombs & Shaw asked to undecided voters as “what are you most concerned about these days?” (McCombs & Bell, 95). • When McCombs & Shaw ranked the answers of the respondents they realised that “[t]there was a strong relationship between the public’s and the media’s agenda of issues. McCombs and Shaw named this transfer of salience from the media agenda to the public agenda the agenda-setting influence of mass communication” (McCombs & Bell, 96). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  7. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • The Definition • Bernard Cohen defines the agenda-setting theory without giving its name in his book, The Press and Foreign Policy (1963). For him, the media “may not successful much of the time in telling people what to think, but it’s stunningly successful in telling its readers what to think about” (Quoted in Soronka, 2002, 265). • McCombs & Shaw theorised Lipmann’s thesis as “agenda-setting”. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  8. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Shaw & McCombs (1977) conducted a research about the relationship between politics and media. • Palmgreen & Clarke (1977) “examined the differences existed in the media’s agenda-setting role for local and national media” (McCombs & Shaw, 97). • Palmgreen & Clarke (1977) found that ‘media’s impact is weaker at the local level than national level’ (McCombs & Shaw, 97). • Other significant researches are, Salwen (1988), Winter & Eyal (1981), Smith (1987), Eaton (1989), Brosius & Kepplinger (1990) etc. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  9. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Framing the News • Another part of agenda-setting is framing. • Why understanding framing the news is important in agenda-setting research because “mass media have a strong impact by constructing social reality” (Dietram A. Scheufele, 1999, 105). • So framing can seen as a way of both understanding the society and the media. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  10. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • According to McCombs, Shaw and Weaver (1997), “framing is… an extension of agenda-setting” (Scheufele, 103). • According to Scheufele, “within the realm of political communication, framing has to be defined and operationalized on the basis of this social constructivism. Mass media actively set the frames of reference that readers or viewers use to interpret and discuss public events” (105). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  11. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • How can we define frames? • Before defining what the frames are, it is better to look at the frames in general. • According to Scheufele, there are two types of frames: media frames and individual frames. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  12. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Gamson and Modigliani (1987) define media frames “as a central organizing idea or story line that provides meaning to an unfolding strip of events… The fames suggests what the controversy is about, the essence of the issue” (Quoted in Scheufele, 106). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  13. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • For Tuchman (1987) “the news frame organizes everday reality and the news frame is a part and parcel of everyday reality… [the frame] is an essential feature of news” (Quoted in Scheufele, 106). • Also for Gitlin, media frames serve as a working routine for the journalists “to quickly identify and classify information and ‘to package it for efficient relay to their audiences (Scheufele, 106). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  14. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • For Entman (1993) frames are important because with framing, some aspects of ‘perceived reality’ is ‘making more salient in communication’ (Quoted in Scheufele, 107). • Hence, one can argue that media frames are re-constructing the ‘realities’ in our lives. • Thus, as McCombs, Shaw and Weaver argue, framing is a part of agenda-setting because by framing the news media workers (journalists and power elite) set the agenda. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  15. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • According to Entman individual frames can be defined as “mentally stored clusters of ideas that guide individuals’ processing information” (Quoted in Scheufele, 107). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  16. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • According to the study of Princeton Survey Research Associates, there are 13 types of frames are using in newspapers. These are: • Straight News Account, Conflict Story, Consensus Story, Conjecture Story, Process Story, Historical Outlook, Horse Race, Trend Story, Policy Explored, Reaction Story, Reality Check, Wrongdoing Exposed, and Personality Profile. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  17. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Straight News Account: No dominant narrative frame other than outlining the basic who, what, where, why, and how. In other words, straight news account can be defined as the 5Ws and H principle in journalism, which is known as inverted pyramid. • Conflict Story: A focus on conflict inherent to the situation or brewing among the players. • Consensus Story: An emphasis on the points of agreement around an issue or event. • Conjecture Story: A focus around conjecture or speculation of what is to come. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  18. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Process Story: An explanation of the process of something or how something works. • Historical Outlook: How the current news fits into history. • Horse Race: Who is winning and who is losing. • Trend Story: The news as an ongoing trend. • Policy Explored: A focus on exploring policy and its impact. • Reaction Story: A response or reaction from one of the major players. • Reality Check: A close look into the veracity of a statement made or information is given. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  19. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Wrongdoing Exposed: The uncovering of wrongdoing or injustice. • Personality Profile: A profile of the newsmaker. • The most common frame in the news is the straight news account. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  20. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • ‘Frames are necessary way to organising the information to make it more coherent and interesting and to put it into perspective’. • ‘Journalists may rely on certain frames too reflexively, especially for certain kinds of stories’. • ‘News that is too formulaic and familiar becomes less interesting and less useful’. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  21. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Frames are important because: • with frames agenda can be set. • In all media (print, radio, TV, Internet etc.) space is important, so journalists must frame the news and present it. • frames make journalists work easy. By having certain types of clichés journalists are writing their news easily. • Frames show how ideology works in the media. • For Edelman (1993), “the choice of frames often is ‘driven by ideology and prejudice’” (Quoted in Scheufele, 110) Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  22. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • So, by framing the news journalists contribute the supporting of the status quo. • By framing the news journalists eliminate some news but are they consciously choose some other news for setting the agenda? • Framing is not only a part of ‘agenda-setting’ but also gatekeeping. • According to Scheufele “how people think about an issue is influenced by the accessibility of frames” (116). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  23. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • The Importance of ‘Agenda-Setting’ • ‘Agenda-Setting’ theory is not only talk about how people are influenced by the media but also how media plays a big part in the maintaining the status quo. • Wag the Dog, directed by Berry Levinson (1998), is a good example of how media can manipulate people. • it can be seen as both ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ at the same time. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  24. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • With ‘agenda-setting’ people realise the power of the media, and how it works. • However, one of the main problem of ‘agenda-setting’ is depending the idea of ‘passive audience’. • That’s why, there are some theories in the ‘agenda-setting’ research that claims the activeness of audience and argue that media does not set people’s agenda but ‘people set the media’s agenda’. Is it possible? Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  25. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Conclusions • Agenda-setting research shows how the media influence our way of thinking. • Like in the film, Wag the Dog, agenda-setting is very useful to give an idea about the manipulation of the mass media. • “Agenda-setting theory has opened many doors to reveal the power and ethical responsibility of the news media, and it continues to identify other intellectual doors” (McCombs & Bell, 108). Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  26. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • The term framing was introduced by Todd Gitlin in 1980 in his study of “how American television network trivialized a major student political movement during the 1960s” (McCombs & Bell, 106). • Frames can be very useful for journalists (media labours) to frame the issues. • It can also be useful for journalists because by having certain type of frames journalists can write their news stories easily. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  27. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • Framing is also a part of ‘gatekeeping’ because by framing the news, some news are putting ‘on the agenda’ however some are not. • In other words, by framing the news, agenda can be set. Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

  28. Lesson 3: Agenda-Setting & Framing • DISCUSSION TOPICS FOR THIS WEEK: • Have you ever thought about what you think and why you think? • Why we focus on some issues but not something else? • Is there any relationship between what you think and what media says to us? • If so, why? If not, then, what are the impacts of the media on our daily lives? Metin ERSOY - Spring 2009

More Related