SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration

taber avatar
24 diapositives · 425 Views · Jul 09, 2014

Life Cycle Cost Analysis. Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014. Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration. Presentation Outline. Life Cycle Cost Analysis Definition LCCA Five Steps Process Current Issues Resources / Reference. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Definition.

Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration - slide 1
01 / 24Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration

  2. Presentation Outline • Life Cycle Cost Analysis Definition • LCCA Five Steps Process • Current Issues • Resources / Reference

  3. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Definition • A process for evaluating the total economic worth of a usable project segment by analyzing initial costs and discounted future costs, such as maintenance, user, reconstruction, rehabilitation, restoring, and resurfacing costs, over the life of the project segment. Source: Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century

  4. LCCA Overview Ananalytical tool to provide a cost comparison between two or morecompeting design alternatives producing equivalent benefits forthe projectbeing analyzed.

  5. The LCCA Process • Step 1: Establish alternatives • Step 2: Determine timing of required activities • Step 3: Estimate agency and user costs • Step 4: Compute life-cycle costs • Step 5: Analyze the results

  6. Step 1: Establish Alternatives • Activities to ensure performance • Initial construction or rehabilitation activity • Future rehabilitation and preservation activities

  7. Time Initial Activity Activity One Activity Two Step 2: Determine Activity Timing Serviceability Terminal Serviceability Index Service Life Analysis Period Long enough to capture differences between alternatives When will the future preservation and countermeasure costs be incurred?

  8. Step 3: Estimate Agency and User Costs • Include cost elements that are different between alternatives • Exclude cost elements that are the same between alternatives • Agency overhead costs • Real estate acquisitions • Normal operations user costs

  9. Step 3:Estimate Agency and User Costs • Approach fundamentals • Compare demand and capacity under normal operations and work zone conditions • Determine how traffic is impacted • Convert traffic impacts into costs

  10. Cash Flow Diagram Initial Activity Rehab 1 $ Preservation Activities Agency Costs Salvage or Remaining Value Time Initial Activity Work Zone Rehab 1 Work Zone Preservation Work Zones $ User Costs Time

  11. Step 4: Calculate NPV of Life-cycle Costs N 1 Σ Net Present Value = of Costs (Costk)x (1 + d)nk k = 0 Present Value Factor Costk= cost of activity N = length of analysis period d = discount rate nk = year of expenditure

  12. Step 5: Analyze the Results • How do agency costs compare? • How do user costs compare? • Can trade-offs be made?

  13. Current Issues • MAP 21 and LCCA • GAO Report: LCCA – Pavement Selection • LCCA and Alternative Bidding

  14. MAP-21 and LCCA

  15. MAP-21 to asset management? Each State is required to develop a risk-based asset management plan for the National Highway System (NHS) to improve or preserve the condition of the assets and the performance of the system. (23 U.S.C. 119(e)(1), MAP-21 § 1106)

  16. Highway Asset Management Plan Plan Contents • pavement and bridge inventory and conditions on the NHS • objectives and measures • performance gap identification • lifecycle cost and risk management analysis • a financial plan • investment strategies

  17. GAO and Next Steps

  18. GAO and Next Steps • Define Program Characteristics • Obtain Data • Verify what was used was correct • Document the Estimate • Present Estimate for approval • Update the Estimate

  19. FHWA Program Performance Management Alternate Bidding • What is the FHWA position on alternate bidding for pavement type selection? FHWA considers alternate pavement type bidding a suitable approach for determining pavement type when engineering and economic analysis does not indicate a clear choice between different pavement designs.

  20. Consideration of Challenges LCCA Consistency Flexibility

  21. LCCA Resources LCCA Case Study User Manual LCCA Primer LCCA Technical Bulletin http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/lcca.htm

  22. RealCost LCCA Software • Microsoft Excel based application – existing user expertise and user customizable • User interface – separates inputs from analysis methodology • Offers both Deterministic and Probabilistic Analysis • Available free of charge, regular enhancements and technical assistance from FHWA

  23. Reference • FHWA LCCA Internet Site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/lcca.cfm • GAO Report : LCCA-Pavement Selection http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-544 • FHWA TA on Use of Alternative Bidding for Pavement Type Selection: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/t504039.cfm

  24. Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration luis.rodriguez@dot.gov 404-562-3681 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenter/ Thank You