1 / 10

Lecture 7

Lecture 7. Misrepresentation, Mistake and Duress. Overview of Vitiating Factors. Remedies for Misrepresentation. Fraudulent Misrepresentation. Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374, per Lord Herschell:

taipa
Télécharger la présentation

Lecture 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lecture 7 Misrepresentation, Mistake and Duress

  2. Overview of Vitiating Factors

  3. Remedies for Misrepresentation

  4. Fraudulent Misrepresentation Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374, per Lord Herschell: … fraud is proved when it is shewn that a false representation has been made (1) knowingly, or (2) without belief in its truth, or (3) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false … To prevent a false statement being fraudulent, there must, I think, always be an honest belief in its truth.

  5. Negligent Misrepresentation Need to show: • Duty of care owed by representor to representee • Representation is false • Damage is caused by the falsity of the statement

  6. Common Mistake Both parties are mistaken; importantly they are both under the same mistake Eg McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission - Both parties thought the oil tanker existed

  7. Mutual Mistake The parties are at cross purposes, so that each reasonably believes that the other is contracting in relation to a different subject matter or terms – so much so that there is no contract (no meeting of the minds)

  8. Unilateral Mistake Only one party is mistaken, as to either: • The terms of the contract, or • The identity of the other party In order for a unilateral mistake to warrant the setting aside of the contract, the other party must usually have brought about the mistake, or have know of it and done nothing to correct it.

  9. Non est Factum From Galley v Lee, adopted in Petelin v Cullen: The elements to be shown when arguing non est factum are: • a disability, and • induced to sign, and • the document signed is fundamentally different to what they thought they were signing

  10. Duress A wrongful threat that is made to induce entry into a contract. Three types: • Physical threat against a person • Physical threat against goods • Economic

More Related