1 / 14

Snow Cover: Current Capabilities, Gaps and Issues (Canadian Perspective)

Explore importance of snow cover, key variables, information requirements, Canadian science issues, in-situ networks, satellite remote sensing, and research applications for climate studies.

talexander
Télécharger la présentation

Snow Cover: Current Capabilities, Gaps and Issues (Canadian Perspective)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environment Canada Environnement Canada Snow Cover: Current Capabilities, Gaps and Issues (Canadian Perspective) Anne Walker Climate Research Branch, Meteorological Service of Canada IGOS-Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, March 2-4, 2005

  2. Importance of Snow Cover • Largest areal extent of any component of the cryosphere (mean max. extent of ~47 x 106 km2) • High spatial and temporal variability in properties • Impacts both global/regional energy and water cycles • high reflectance, thermal insulation, storage of water Key variables: • extent (areal coverage), depth, water equivalent (water content), wet/dry state, grain size • Snowfall/solid precipitation Information requirements: • indicator of climate variability and change • Input/validation of models – NWP, hydrological, climate • Environmental monitoring/prediction – flood forecasting, severe weather (blowing snow), soil moisture/drought, forest fire risk, wildlife • Economic – hydropower production/management, agriculture, tourism

  3. CliC Requirements for Observations and Monitoring • Validation of coupled climate models (gridded hemispheric-global datasets from observations) • Improved understanding of processes and improved model parameterizations (detailed field datasets) • Monitoring variability and change (long-term, homogeneous data series) • Diagnostic studies of climate-cryosphere interactions (combination of re-analyses, data and modelling)

  4. Canadian Science Issues Related to Snow Observing Systems • Quantifying the spatial and temporal variability in snow properties (water resource planning, GCM/RCM evaluation, input to NWP) • Quantifying the spatial and temporal variability of liquid and solid precipitation (essential input to climate and hydrological models, operational decision making) • Improved understanding of snow interception, sublimation and redistribution (improved representation of snow in climate and hydrological models)

  5. Snow: In Situ Observing Networks in Canada • temperature and precipitation network (MSC) • hourly/synoptic meteorological observations (MSC) • “snow on ground” (depth) network (MSC) • snow course observations (Provinces, MSC, hydro companies)

  6. Current MSC Snow Depth Network Network biased to coastal locations in Arctic Significant data sparse areas Network biased to low elevations in cordillera

  7. 2477 Active Synoptic Stations All active Synoptic Stations north of 50 N as of 29 Oct 2001 (WMO Publication No. 9 Volume A).

  8. MSC networks are under pressure

  9. Satellite Remote Sensing • alternative information source for remote areas where conventional data are sparse or unavailable • 20-30+ yr data record for satellite-derived cryospheric information (sea ice, snow cover) • high repeat coverage of large regions (daily) • diurnal trends from multiple daytime passes • consistent spatial info. across coverage • gridded information for input/validation of models (climate, land surface process, hydrology, etc.) • requires development of retrieval techniques (algorithms) to derive information on snow cover properties  research MODIS image - composite

  10. Snow: Remote Sensing/Satellite Capabilities • Snow Extent – Areal Coverage • optical (visible/infrared) – AVHRR, Landsat, MODIS • 30m to 1 km spatial information • long history of standard snow products (NOAA snow charts back to 1960’s) • dependent on solar illumination, limited by cloud cover Global Daily Snow Cover from MODIS (Red – snow, Blue – clouds) NOAA daily IMS snow chart

  11. Snow: Remote Sensing/Satellite Capabilities • Snow Depth/Snow Water Equivalent • passive microwave – only proven satellite technique for SWE retrieval • historical record back to 1978 (SMMR, SSM/I) available in consistent 25 km grid format • requires regionally-tuned algorithms to take into account landscape effects, variation in physical properties  validation a challenge! • On-going research into SWE retrieval from active microwave (SAR) – offers higher spatial resolution capability Global SWE map from AMSR-E (limited validation) SSM/I SWE map for Canadian prairie region (produced by MSC weekly for 15+ years)

  12. Climate Research Applications of Passive Microwave SWE • Availability of SMMR and SSM/I in consistent gridded format (EASE-Grid)  25 winter seasons (1978/79 – 2002/03) • Investigation of spatial and temporal variations in snow cover in relation to climate/atmospheric circulation • Evaluation of climate model snow cover outputs – GCM, RCM Pentad winter season (DJF) SWE anomalies produced using passive microwave satellite data time series. Dashed line denotes transition from SMMR to SSM/I. Merging Conventional (1915-1992) and Passive Microwave (1978 – 2002) Time Series

  13. Summary of Measurement Capabilities

  14. Issues Related to Snow Observing Systems 1. Decline in in situ capabilities • decreasing networks • effects of automation • loss of manual measurements (e.g. snow survey), poor understanding of automated sensors • solid precipitation measurement 2. Development/validation of satellite remote sensing capabilities • validation of current snow retrieval products (esp. SWE) • support of new satellite systems (e.g. E-GPM/CGPM for solid precipitation) • support of algorithm development research 3. Data gaps in northern latitudes (> 60 N) • sparse in situ measurements • challenge to validate satellite retrievals 4. Development of techniques to merge in situ measurements and satellite retrievals 5. Canadian GCOS Cryosphere Plan – detailed summary of cryospheric data requirements and issues

More Related