1 / 58

Recent Results in Spin Physics at and

Recent Results in Spin Physics at and . Anselm Vossen Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter. (Re)Stating the Obvious: Motivation for Studying Q C D. QCD successful in describing high energy reactions BUT No consistent description of hadronic sector

talib
Télécharger la présentation

Recent Results in Spin Physics at and

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent Results in Spin Physics at and Anselm Vossen Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter

  2. (Re)Stating the Obvious: Motivation for Studying QCD • QCD successful in describing high energy reactions • BUT No consistent description of hadronic sector • Many phenomena that are not understood • No consistent description of fundamental bound state of the theory • Compare to QED: • Bound state: QED: atom • Stringent tests of QED from study of spin structure of hydrogen • g-2 of the electron • Lamb shift (Nobel prize 1955) • Vacuum effects: Polarization, Casimir • Atomic physics • QCD: • Phenomena fundamentally richer • Fundamental bound state proton • QCD binding energy : most of the visible energy in the universe • Nucleon Sea, Theta vacua transitions related to EW Baryogenesis • Use transverse spin to study QCD on amplitude level with interference • Tools: Light source p-p Collider

  3. (Re)Stating the Obvious: Motivation for Studying QCD Millenium Prize • QCD successful in describing high energy reactions • BUT No consistent description of hadronic sector • Many phenomena that are not understood • No consistent description of fundamental bound state of the theory • Compare to QED: • Bound state: QED: atom • Stringent tests of QED from study of spin structure of hydrogen • g-2 of the electron • Lamb shift (Nobel prize 1955) • Vacuum effects: Polarization, Casimir • Atomic physics • QCD: • Phenomena fundamentally richer • Fundamental bound state proton • QCD binding energy : most of the visible energy in the universe • Nucleon Sea, Theta vacua transitions related to EW Baryogenesis • Use transverse spin to study QCD on amplitude level with interference • Tools: Light source p-p Collider

  4. RHIC: The QCD Machine • Outline • RHIC and the STAR detector • Highlights of the longitudinal Spin Program at STAR • Gluon Polarization • Sea Quark Polarization • Transverse polarization of quarks in the proton • Measuring Spin Dependent Fragmentation Functions in e+e- at Belle

  5. RHIC: The QCD Machine Absolute Polarimeter (H jet) RHIC pCPolarimeters ANDY/ BRAHMS E-Lens and Spin Flipper Siberian Snakes Siberian Snakes PHENIX STAR Spin Rotators (longitudinal polarization) Spin Rotators (longitudinal polarization) Pol. H- Source LINAC EBIS BOOSTER Helical Partial Siberian Snake AGS 200 MeV Polarimeter AGS pC Polarimeter Strong AGS Snake • Versatility: • Polarized p+pSqrt(s) collisions at 62.4 GeV, 200 GeV and 500 GeV • Recent Spin Runs: • 2011 500 GeV, longitudinal at Phenix, transverse at STAR ~30 pb-1 sampled • 2012 200 GeV, Phenix and STAR, transverse ~20 pb-1 sampled (STAR: ~x10 statistics)

  6. STAR

  7. The STAR Detector in 2010 Time Projection Chamber (TPC) Charged Particle Tracking |η|<1.3 Endcap Electromagnetic Calorimeter: 1<η<2 Forward EMC 2<η<4 Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC): |η|<1 h = - ln(tan(q/2))

  8. Central Region (-1<h<1) • Identified Pions, h • Jets • Endcap (1<eta<2) • Pi0, eta, (some) jets • FMS (2<eta<4) • Pi0, eta Full azimuth spanned with nearly contiguous electromagnetic calorimetry from -1<h<4  approaching full acceptance detector PID (Barrel) with dE/dx, in the future: ToF pi/K separation up to 1.9 GeV

  9. 10 20 30 pT(GeV) Proton Spin Structure with Quark and Gluon Probes at ultra-relativistic energies the proton represents a beam of quark and gluon probes jet Hard Scattering Process Dominates at RHIC: Jet production provides directprobe of gluon content

  10. DG2 DGDq Dq2 Gluon Polarization Measurement Polarized DIS: ~ 0.3 Poorly constrained Hard Scattering Process The related double spin asymmetry: experimental double spin asymmetry DIS pQCD ? Dominates at RHIC ~ probe gluon content in jet production

  11. Jets: Proven Capabilities in p+p, pQCD regime B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR Coll.), Phys.Rev.Lett. 97, 252001, 2006 SPIN-2010: Matt Walker/Tai Sakuma, for the collaboration Jets well understood in STAR, experimentally and theoretically

  12. STAR Improved precision from 2006 to 2009 Substantially larger figure of merit (P4 x L) than in all previous runs combined

  13. New global analysis with 2009 RHIC data Special thanks to the DSSV group! DSSV++ is a new, preliminary global analysis from the DSSV group that includes 2009 ALL measurements from PHENIX and STAR First experimental evidence of non-zero gluon polarization in the RHIC range (0.05 < x < 0.2)

  14. Probing sea quark polarization through Ws • Weak interaction process • Only left-handed quarks • Only right-handed anti-quarks • Perfect spin separation Parity violating single helicity asymmetry AL • Complementary to SIDIS measurements • High Q2 ~ MW2 • No fragmentation function effects

  15. Δu Δd High precision W asymmetry era PHENIXandSTAR through 2013 run First preliminary results from 2012 already provide substantial sensitivity Future results will provide a dramatic reduction in the uncertainties

  16. Discovery of Large Asymmetries in p+p Test of QCD: Asymmetries for transverse spin are small at high energies (Kane, Pumplin, Repko, PRL 41, 1689–1692 (1978) ) Experiment (E704, Fermi National Laboratory): π+ π0 π-

  17. Discovery of Large Asymmetries in p+p Test of QCD: Asymmetries for transverse spin are small at high energies (Kane, Pumplin, Repko, PRL 41, 1689–1692 (1978) ) Experiment (STAR, Brookhaven National Laboratory): Effect persists at high energies (pQCD valid)

  18. Possible AN Explanations: Transverse Momentum Dep. Distributions Sivers Effect:Introduce transverse momentum of parton relative to proton. Collins Effect:Introduce transverse momentum of fragmenting hadron relative to parton. SP SP kT,p p p p p Sq kT,π Correlation between Proton spin (Sp) and parton transverse momentum kT,p Correlation between Proton spin (Sp) and quark spin (Sq) + spin dep. frag. function Intrinsic transverse momentum challenges Current QCD framework Number of Citations:

  19. Possible AN Explanations: Transverse Momentum Dep. Distributions Sivers Effect:Introduce transverse momentum of parton relative to proton. Collins Effect:Introduce transverse momentum of fragmenting hadron relative to parton. SP SP kT,p p p p p Talk about this next time;-) Sq kT,π Next Time Correlation between Proton spin (Sp) and parton transverse momentum kT,p Correlation between Proton spin (Sp) and quark spin (Sq) + spin dep. frag. function Intrinsic transverse momentum challenges Current QCD framework Number of Citations:

  20. Parton Distribution Functions The three leading order, collinear PDFs q(x) f1q (x) unpolarized PDF quark with momentumx=pquark/pprotonin a nucleon well known – unpolarized DIS helicity PDF quark with spin parallel to the nucleon spinin a longitudinally polarized nucleon known – polarized DIS q(x) g1q(x) transversity PDF quark with spin parallel to the nucleon spin in a transversely polarized nucleon Helicity – transversity: direct measurement of the nonzero angular momentum components in the protons wavefunction Tq(x) h1q(x) chiral odd, poorly known Cannot be measured inclusively

  21. γ* e- u,d,s   + + + + Probability to Find Polarized Quark Optical Theorem: s=-Im(Aforward scattering)

  22.    ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Transversity is Chiral Odd • Transversity base:   _ _ + = _ + Difference in densities for ↑, ↓ quarks in ↑ nucleon • Helicity base: chiral odd • Needs chiral odd partnerFragmentation Function • Does not couple to gluons adifferent QCD evolution than g1(x) • Valence dominatedaTensor charge gT comparable to Lattice calculations

  23. _ Chiral odd FFs Collins effect + * * _ + q N _ + : Collins FF

  24. Lz Lz-1 _ Chiral odd FFs Interference Fragmentation Function + * * _ + q N _ +

  25. Collins effect in quark fragmentation J.C. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B396, 161(1993) q Collins Effect: Fragmentation with of a quark qwith spin sqinto a spinless hadron h carries an azimuthal dependence:

  26. Mid-Rapidity Collins Asymmetry Analysis at STAR • STAR provides the full mid-rapidity jet reconstruction and charged pion identification • Look for spin dependent azimuthal distributions of charged pions inside the jets! First proposed by F. Yuan in Phys.Rev.Lett.100:032003. • Measure average weighted yield: pbeam S⊥ ΦS pπ jT Φh –pbeam PJET

  27. Mid-rapidity Collins analysis Run 12 Projections

  28. Interference FF in Quark Fragmentation q Interference Fragmentation Function: Fragmentation of a transversely polarized quark q into two spin-less hadron h1, h2 carries an azimuthal dependence:

  29. Di-Hadron Correlations : Angle between polarisation vector and event plane Bacchetta and Radici, PRD70, 094032 (2004)

  30. c b X Interference Fragmentation Function in p-p fR-fS X a fS : Angle between polarisation vector and event plane

  31. NEW: STAR shows significant Signal!

  32. Strong Rapidity Dependence • STAR upgrades will cover h<2 in the near future • <xBj>0.25 (current)0.45: Not probed in SIDIS yet! • Proposed Forward upgrade:h<4 p+/p- p+/p- Additional precision data from last years run + increased kinematic reach Explore p0/p+-channels

  33. Spin Dependent FF in e+e- : Need Correlation between Hemispheres ! • Asymmetry is • Need fragmentation function • Quark spin direction unknown: measurement of • Interference Fragmentation function in one hemisphere is not possible • sin φ modulation will average out. • Correlation between two hemispheres with • sin φRi single spin asymmetries results in • cos(φR1+φR2) modulation of the observed di-hadron • yield. • Measurement of azimuthal correlations for di-pion pairs • around the jet axis in two-jet events!

  34. z2 z1 Measuring spin dependent FFs in e+e- Annihilation into Quarks • Spin dependence in e+e- • quark fragmentation • will lead to (azimuthal) • asymmetries in • correlation measurements! • Experimental requirements: • Small asymmetries  • very large data sample! • Good particle ID to high • momenta. • Hermetic detector electron q1 q2 quark-2 spin quark-1 spin z1,2 relative pion pair momenta positron Here for di-hadron correlations:

  35. Measurement of Fragmentation Functions @ • KEKB: L>2.11 x 1034cm-2s-1 • Asymmetric collider: • 8GeV e- + 3.5 GeV e+ • √s=10.58 GeV ((4S)) • e+e-(4S)BB • Integrated Luminosity: > 1000 fb-1 • Continuum production: 10.52 GeV • e+e-(u, d, s, c) • >70 fb-1 => continuum Belle detector KEKB Anselm Vossen 35 35

  36. He/C2H6 Large acceptance, good tracking and particle identification! Collins Asymmetries in Belle 36 36

  37. Measuring Light Quark Fragmentation Functions on the ϒ(4S) Resonance e+e-qq̅, q∈uds 4s “off” e+e-cc̅ • small B contribution (<1%) in high thrust sample • >75% of X-section continuum under • ϒ(4S) resonance • ~100 fb-1~1000 fb-1 0.5 0.8 1.0

  38. Interference Fragmentation– thrust method e+e-(p+p-)jet1(p+p-)jet2X Find pion pairs in opposite hemispheres Observe angles j1+j2between the event-plane (beam, jet-axis) and the two two-pion planes. Theoretical guidance by papers of Boer,Jakob,Radici[PRD 67,(2003)] and Artru,Collins[ZPhysC69(1996)] Early work by Collins, Heppelmann, Ladinsky [NPB420(1994)] j2-p p-j1 • Model predictions by: • Jaffe et al. [PRL 80,(1998)] • Radici et al. [PRD 65,(2002)]

  39. Transverse Spin Dependent FFs: Cuts and Binning • Full off-resonance and on-resonance data (7-55): ~73 fb-1 + 588 fb-1 • Visible energy >7GeV • PID: Purities in for pion pairs > 90% • Opposite hemisphere between pairs pions • All hadrons in barrel region: -0.6 < cos (q) <0.9 • Thrust axis in central area: cosine of thrust axis around beam <0.75 • Thrust > 0.8 to remove B-events  < 1% B events in sample • Zhad1 >0.2

  40. Asymmetry extraction Amplitude a12 directly measures ( IFF ) x ( -IFF ) (no double ratios) • Build normalized yields: • Fit with: or

  41. (z1x m1) Binning arXiv:1104.2425 AV et. al, PRL 107, 072004(2011)

  42. (m1x z1) Binning arXiv:1104.2425 AV et. al, PRL 107, 072004(2011)

  43. Comparison to theory predictions Red line: theory prediction + uncertainties Blue points: data • Mass dependence : Magnitude at low masses comparable, high masses • significantly larger (some contribution possibly from charm ) • Z dependence : Rising behavior steeper

  44. Subprocess contributions (MC) 8x8 m1 m2 binning tau contribution (only significant at high z) charged B(<5%, mostly at higher mass) Neutral B (<2%) charm( 20-60%, mostly at lower z) uds (main contribution)

  45. Measurement at Belle leads to first point by point extraction of Transversity M. Radici at FF workshop, RIKEN, 11/2012 See also: Courtoy: Phys. Rev. Lett. 107:012001,2011 Is Soffer Bound violated? h(x)<|f(x)+g(x)|/2

  46. Handedness Correlations   Thrust direction L R   L/R

  47. QCD Vacuum Transitions carry Chirality QN The QCD Vacuum Difference in winding number: Net chirality carried by Instanton/Sphaleron • Vacuum states are characterized by “winding number” • Transition amplitudes: Gluon configurations, carry net chirality • e.g. quarks: net spin momentum alignment • Similar mechanism to EW baryogenesis

  48. QCD Vacuum Transitions carry Chirality QN arXiv:0909.1717v2 [ Kharzeev, McLerran and Warringa, arXiv:0711.0950, Fukushima, Kharzeev and Warringa, arXiv:0808.3382

  49. Handedness Correlations Expect negative correlation for local p-odd effect   Thrust direction L R Q=1   L/R

  50. q Unpolarized Fragmentation Functions Precise knowledge of upol. FFs necessary for virtually all SIDIS measurements e- γ* e+ q h First FF extraction including uncertainties (e+e-):Hirai, Kumano, Nagai, Sudoh (KEK)Phys. Rev. D 75, 094009 (2007) Dπ+i

More Related