1 / 1
REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED
10 likes | 182 Vues
MAP 1. INDIVIDUAL STATE MODELS MERGED. MAP 2. REGIONAL, OR BIOGEOGRAPHIC MODEL. REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED Ree Brannon, Gap Analysis Program 530 S. Asbury St, Suite 1, Moscow, ID 83843 (abrannon@uidaho.edu).
Télécharger la présentation
REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
MAP 1. INDIVIDUAL STATE MODELS MERGED MAP 2. REGIONAL, OR BIOGEOGRAPHIC MODEL REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED Ree Brannon, Gap Analysis Program 530 S. Asbury St, Suite 1, Moscow, ID 83843 (abrannon@uidaho.edu) Table 2. Comparison of Northern Oriole distribution between individual state models and a western range model.
More Related