1 / 49

Common Designs for Controlled Clinical Trials

Common Designs for Controlled Clinical Trials. A. Parallel Group Trials 1. Simplest example - 2 groups, no stratification 2. Stratified design 3. Matched pairs 4. Factorial design B. Crossover Trials. Parallel Group Design. y. T. e. =. m. +. +. ij. i. ij. overall mean. m. =.

tambre
Télécharger la présentation

Common Designs for Controlled Clinical Trials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Common Designs for Controlled Clinical Trials A. Parallel Group Trials 1. Simplest example - 2 groups, no stratification 2. Stratified design 3. Matched pairs 4. Factorial design B.Crossover Trials

  2. Parallel Group Design y T e = m + + ij i ij overall mean m = th T effect of i treatment = i (i = A, B) th th e error term for j patient in i group = ij 2 e ~ N(0, ) s ij 2 y ~ N ( T , ) m + s ij i 2 2 2 s = s + s s e

  3. 2 s  2 s 2 e 2 s 2 e 2 s 2 e       2 s 2 e Estimates of  and  for Selected Response Variables Diastolic BP (mmHg) 58 36 94 0.62 Serum cholesterol 1200 400 1600 0.75 (mg/dl) Viral load 0.16 0.09 0.25 0.64(log10 copies/mL) Overnight urine 325 625 950 0.34 excretion of Na+ (meq/L) Carbohydrate intake 110 208 318 0.35 (% of calories) Total    

  4. A Poorly Designed “Crossover” Trial: Why? 2n patients Drug A Drug B . . . or or Low Dose Low Dose Also referred to as “changeover” or “switchover”

  5. Two-Period Crossover Trial Period 1 2 W A S H O U T Drug A Drug B n 2n - Randomize Patients n Drug B Drug A

  6. SNaP 100 mEq NaCI Placebo Group I (n=25) Schematic design of study to determine effects of dietary sodium on blood pressure in normotensive adults WASH-OUT Group II (n=23) Placebo 100 mEq NaCI Weeks -8 0 4 6 10 Low Sodium Diet Hypertension 1991; 17:I21-I26.

  7. Crossover Trial Advantages: • Fewer patients required in most situations due to elimination of between subject component of variability, therefore: • recruitment may be easier • can be more easily done in single center • fewer patients exposed to experimental treatment • Less data collection Disadvantages: • Interaction due to: • differential carry-over effects of treatments • treatment x period interaction • differences between the two randomized groups (AB and BA) at baseline • Patients must be observed longer • Losses to follow-up/missing data • Naturally occurring changes in underlying disease state

  8. Situations where crossover design is most applicable: 1. Rapid response and response is transitory 2. Variability between patients is large compared to variability within patients 3. Steady state physiological condition; disease or condition cannot be cured 4. No residual or carry-over effects of treatment expected

  9. Survey of Randomized Trials in 2000 • 116 of 526 published trials were crossover • Median sample size for crossover trials = 15 • 78% of crossover studies involved 2 treatments • 70% of crossover studies reported a washout period • 17% reported a test for carry-over effect and 13% tested for period effects Mills EJ et al. Trials 2009

  10. General Model for 2-Period Crossover Trial y = + + T + + + m p l g e ijk u v ij ijk k = overall mean m = effect of kth period (k = 1, 2) p k T = effect of uth treatment (u = A, B) u (direct effect) = residual effect of treatment given in first period l v on second period response (v = A, B) ( = 0 for first period measurements, l v i.e., when k = 1) Hills and Armitage Br J Clin Pharmac 1979; 8:7-20. Senn Stat Methods Med Res 1994;3:303-324.

  11.  2 s 2 e   = random effect between subject of jth g ij patient in group i (I or II); same in each period 2 N(0, ) » s s = random within patient effect for kth period e ijk 2 N(0, ) » s e Motivation for crossover

  12. 2-Period Crossover TrialFixed Effects 1 2 I (AB) II (BA) Period  +  + T +  +  + T  A A B 1 2 Group  +  + T +  +  + T  B B A 1 2

  13. Group I (AB) Patient (i = 1)Response - Patient j Period 1 : y = + + T + + m p g e 1j1 1 A 1j 1j1 Period 2 : y = + + T + + + m p l g e ij2 2 B A 1j 1j2 Paired difference dI = y - y 1 1j1 1j2 = (T - T ) - + ( ) ( ) l p - p + e - e A B A 1 2 1j1 1j2 E(d ) = (T - T ) - + ( ) l p - p I A B A 1 2

  14. Group II (BA) Patient (i = 2)Response - Patient jI Period 1 : y = + + T + + m p g e 2j' 1 1 B 2j' 2j' 1 Period 2 : y = + + T + + + m p l g e 2j' 2 2 A B 2j' 2j' 2 Paired difference y - y 2j' 1 2j2 = (T - T ) - + ( ) + ( ) l p - p e - e B A B 1 2 2j' 1 2j' 2 Consider difference in opposite direction and call it dll d = (T - T ) + + ( ) + ( ) l p - p e - e II A B B 2 1 2j' 2 2j' 1 E(d ) = (T - T ) + + ( ) l p - p II A B B 2 1

  15. = d + d 2 (T - T ) - ( - ) l l I II A B A B - d d = 2 ( ) - ( + ) p - p l l I II 1 2 A B d + d I II estimates T - T if = l l A B A B 2 d - d I II estimates if = 0 p - p l l = 1 2 A B 2

  16. How Do We Convince Ourselves That AB Consider the sum of the period 1 and period 2 responses. Group I (AB) : E(Sum ) = 2 + ( ) m p + p I 1 2 + (T + T ) + l A B A Group II (BA) : E(Sum ) = 2 + ( + ) m p p II 1 2 + (T + T ) + l A B B Note that Sum Sum estimates - I II - l l A B

  17. Test for Carryover Has Low Power • It is a between, instead of within, patient test (even when considering change from baseline, variance is 4 times larger) • Although totals are used, direct information on carry over only comes from 2nd period – effect is diluted with sum’s. • If there is evidence of a carryover effect (p<0.10 or 0.15), Grizzle proposed that the 1st period effects be used. This has been shown to be a sequential testing procedure that is not optimal. Some believe it is better not to carry out the test at all. • Better be sure in the design that there is no carryover effect!

  18. Possible Reasons for Rejecting Hypothesisof Equal Carry-over Effects 1. True carry-over effect for A or B, or both 2. Psychological carry-over effect 3. Difference between treatments depends on pre-treatment level of response variable 4. Group I and Group II differ significantly by chance

  19. A A Group II Response x x B Group I B 1 2 Period 1. Treatment effect 2. No period effect 3. No interaction

  20. A x Group II Response B A x B Group I 1 2 Period 1. Treatment effect 2. Period effect 3. No interaction

  21. Quantitative Interaction A Group II A Group I B Response B 1 2 Period

  22. Qualitative Interaction A B Response B Group I A Group II 1 2 Period

  23. Example from SennStatistical Issues in Drug DevelopmentJohn Wiley & Sons, 1997 BA 2000 2300 300 AB 2300 2000 300 300 Beta-Agonist (A) vs. Placebo (B)for Patients with Asthma FEV1.0 (mL) A-B Difference Sequence Period 1 Period 2

  24. Senn Example (cont.) • Add 350 mL to BA BA 2350 2650 300 AB 2300 2000 300 300 A-B Difference Sequence Period 1 Period 2 Differences are recovered in spite of difference between sequences

  25. Senn Example (cont.) • Add 350 mL to BA; and • Add a secular trend causing FEV1.0 to be 100 mL HIGHER in 2nd period BA 2350 2750 400 AB 2300 2100 200 300 A-B Difference Sequence Period 1 Period 2 Difference in each sequence not recovered, but average is okay – crossover still works!

  26. Senn Example (cont.) • Add 350 mL to BA; and • Add a secular trend causing FEV1.0 to be 100 higher in 2nd period; and • Add a carry-over effect of A (still completely effective when B is given) BA 2350 2750 400 AB 2300 2400 -100 150 A-B Difference Sequence Period 1 Period 2 Crossover does not work!

  27. Variance Estimates (1) d + d I II Treatment Effect = 2 (2) d - d I II Period Effect = 2 (3) Carryover Effect = Sum - Sum I II Variance of (1) and (2) 2 2 1 é ù s s d d = I + II ê ú 4 n n ë û I II 2 pooled variance s = d 2 2 (n - 1) + (n - 1) s s d d I II I II = n + n - 2 I II Variance of (3) 2 2 s s Sum Sum I II = + n n I II 2 2 (n - 1) + (n - 1) s s Sum Sum 2 I II = pooled variance = I II s n + n - 2 Sum I II

  28. Hypothesis Testing 1) H : no interaction o SUM - SUM I II t(n + n - 2) = I II 1 æ ö 1 1 2 ˆ ç + ÷ s ç ÷ SUM n n è ø I II 2) H : no treatment effect o d + d I II 2 t(n + n - 2) = I II 1 æ ö ˆ 1 1 2 s d ç + ÷ ç ÷ 2 n n è ø I II 3) H : no period effect o d - d I II 2 t(n + n - 2) = I II 1 æ ö ˆ 1 1 2 s d ç + ÷ ç ÷ 2 n n è ø I II

  29. Patient Accession No. Period 1 (A) Period 2 (B) A-B Difference Group I Sum 1 8 5 3 13 3 14 10 4 24 4 8 0 8 8 6 9 7 2 16 7 11 6 5 17 9 3 5 -2 8 11 6 0 6 6 13 0 0 0 0 16 13 12 1 25 18 10 2 8 12 19 7 5 2 12 21 13 13 0 26 22 8 10 -2 18 24 7 7 0 14 25 9 0 9 9 27 10 6 4 16 28 2 2 0 4

  30. Group II Patient Accession No. Period 1 (B) Period 2 (A) A-B Difference Sum 2 12 11 -1 23 5 6 8 2 14 8 13 9 -4 22 10 8 8 0 16 12 8 9 1 17 14 4 8 4 12 15 8 14 6 22 17 2 4 2 6 20 8 `13 5 21 23 9 7 -2 16 26 7 10 3 17 29 7 6 -1 13

  31. Group I (N = 17) Period 1 (A) Period 2 (B) A-B Difference Sum Mean 8.12 5.29 2.82 13.41 SD 3.84 4.25 3.47 7.32 SE 0.84 1.78 Group II (N = 12) Period 1 (B) Period 2 (A) A-B Difference Sum Mean 7.67 8.92 1.25 16.58 SD 2.99 2.81 2.99 4.98 SE 0.86 1.44

  32. Ho : No interaction 1) Determine pooled variance of sum 2 2 (n - 1)s + (n - 1)s 2 I I II II s = SUM n + n - 2 I II 2 2 16(7.32) + 11(4.98) = 27 = 41.9

  33. 2) Calculate test statistic SUM - SUM t(n + n - 2) = I II I II æ ö 1 1 2 s ç + ÷ ç ÷ SUM n n è ø I II 16 - 13.49 = 1 1 41.86 + 17 12 = 1.30 3) Compare with t-tables with 27df, p = 0.20

  34. Ho : No treatment difference same procedure 2 2 (n - 1)s + (n - 1)s I I II II 2 s = d d d n + n - 2 I II 2 2 16(3.47) + 11(2.99) = 27 = 10.78

  35. æ ö d + d I II ç ÷ ç ÷ 2 è ø t(n + n - 2) = I II æ ö s 1 1 d ç + ÷ ç ÷ 2 n n è ø I II æ 2.82 + 1.24 ö ç ÷ 2 è ø = 3 . 28 = 10 . 78 1 1 + 2 17 12 p = 0.0028

  36. Similarly for Ho : No Period Effect æ ö d - d I II ç ÷ ç ÷ 2 è ø t(n + n - 2) = I II æ ö s 1 1 d ç + ÷ ç ÷ 2 n n è ø I II æ 2.82 - 1.24 ö ç ÷ 2 è ø = 1 . 27 = 10 . 78 1 1 + 2 17 12 p = 0.21

  37. Two-Period Crossover Trial Period 1 2 W A S H O U T Drug A Drug B n 2n - Randomize Patients n Drug B Drug A

  38. Consider Period 1 Dataand Estimated SE of Treatment Difference(Parallel Group Design) 2 2 (3.84) (16) + (2.99) (11) 2 s = p 2 7 = 12.38 1 1 1 SE = (12.38) 2 + 17 12 = 1.33 compared to 0.62 for crossover

  39. Advantages of Baseline Measurements 1. Description of study participants at entry 2. Comparability of treatment groups: AB vs. BA 3. More powerful test for treatment x period interaction 4. Improved precision for estimating treatment differences (e.g., analysis of covariance or change from baseline when correlation >0.5.) 5. Subgroup analysis

  40. Advantage of a 2nd “Baseline” during Washout Between Periods • Differences between “baseline” measurements for Group I and Group II may provide support for unequal residual effects. NOTE! This comparison does not replace comparison of sums of observation at the end of periods for Group I and Group II that was previously discussed.

  41. Design for Estimating Direct and Residual Treatment Effects Square 1 Period Group1 2 3 I A B C II B C A III C A B Square 2 Period Group1 2 3 I A C B II B A C III C B A

  42. Recommendations 1. Always measure initial baseline. 2. If washout is employed, measure B2. 3. Take multiple measures during each treatment period, e.g., comparison of treatment A with placebo (P). Week of Study Period 1 Period 2 Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I P A A A P P P P II P P P P P A A A B1 B2

More Related