1 / 28

Platina Resources Limited Rob Mosig, Managing Director

Platina Resources Limited Rob Mosig, Managing Director. Global Resources Investing Conference Hong Kong - June 2010. Disclaimer.

tamyra
Télécharger la présentation

Platina Resources Limited Rob Mosig, Managing Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Platina Resources Limited Rob Mosig, Managing Director Global Resources Investing Conference Hong Kong - June 2010

  2. Disclaimer This presentation contains “forward-looking information” which may include, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the future financial or operating performance of Platina Resources Limited (“Platina”), its subsidiaries and its projects, the future price of platinum group metals (“PGM’s”), the estimation of mineral resources, operating and exploration expenditures, costs and timing of development of new deposits, costs and timing of future exploration, requirements for additional capital, government regulation, environmental risks, reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations of insurance coverage. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Platina and/or its subsidiaries to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; the actual results of current exploration activities; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of PGM’s; possible variations of ore grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accident, labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry; and delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities. Although Platina has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that could cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this presentation and Platina disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Platina undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change. Accordingly, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Cautionary note to United States Investors concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources: This presentation uses the terms “Measured”, “Indicated” and “Inferred” Resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 42-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral properties), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Resources will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves.

  3. PGM & Gold Market Highlights Platina Resources Overview Skaergaard Project MunniMunni Project Owendale Project Proposed Work Plan - 2010 Agenda

  4. PGM & Gold Market Highlights

  5. PGM & Gold Market Highlights Gold Long Term Investment Demand Has Shifted Upwards

  6. PGM & Gold Market Highlights BRIC Vehicle Sales In Relation To Global Vehicle Sales • The BRIC economies now account for nearly one third of global vehicle sales. This proportion is expected to continue rising over the long term, possibly reaching the 40% - 45% level. • Emission standards are expected to continue tightening in these and in many other smaller emerging markets thereby supporting long-term demand.

  7. PGM & Gold Market Highlights Percentage of Supply Held by ETFs • In recent years, a growing proportion of PGM supply is being held by ETFs. Investment demand via ETFs has been the driving force behind platinum and palladium prices, consuming excess supply and offsetting some of the weakness in fabrication demand. New ETFs are slated to come onstream owing to the growing popularity of these investment vehicles. Note: ETF data represent holdings at the end of the year. 2009 ETF data is year-to-date. 2009 platinum and palladium is forecast supply.

  8. Platina Resources Overview Platina Resources Limited (“Platina” or the “Company”) is a PGM and gold development and exploration company with a global portfolio of advanced and early-stage projects. Platina has advanced development of its two primary assets, Skaergaard (located in Greenland) and MunniMunni (located in Australia), by completing the second stage of pre-feasibility work for Skaergaard and finalizing a scoping level study for MunniMunni. Both, Skaargaard and MunniMunni, are wholly owned by Platina with no royalties payable on production. Skaergaard and MunniMunni, together, have mineral resources containing 10.4 million oz gold, 30.7 million oz palladium, 2.8 million oz platinum and 76 thousand oz rhodium. Platina is adding development resources to its seasoned management team to optimize the beneficiation plans for the Company’s advanced stage projects. Work programs for 2010 are focused on increasing the confidence level of the Skaergaard mine resource and confirming metallurgical recovery rates for MunniMunni.

  9. Platina Resources Overview (1) Source MEG: Includes active projects in either the resource development, feasibility or preproduction stage.

  10. Project Locations • Global portfolio of emerging gold and PGM projects in Greenland and Australia

  11. Platina Resources Overview Share Structure (June, 2010 ) Platina listed via IPO on the ASX at A$0.20 per share on May 29, 2006 Basic issued & outstanding shares 85,516,498 Options on issue - Quoted 15,443,875 - Unquoted 5,603,000 Fully diluted 106,563,373 Common shares listing ASX: PGM Share price (07/10/09) AUD$0.28 Management ownership (fully diluted) 8.39% Cash on hand A$6.2 million Market Capitalisation A$23,944,619 Head office Varsity Lakes, Queensland, Australia

  12. Platina Resources Overview Management Team Robert W. Mosig, Managing Director – MSc, FAusIMM, FAICD Robert Mosig is a geologist with over 30 years experience in platinum group metals, gold and diamond exploration within Australasia. Thomas Abraham-James, Exploration Manager – BSc (Hons), MAusIMM Thomas Abraham-James is a geologist who began his career conducting advanced exploration on South Africa’s Bushveld Complex (Placer Dome), he later worked as a mine geologist at Rio Tinto’s Argyle Diamond Mine and has since joined Platina. Tom has worked on all of the Company’s projects and managed the 2008 and 2009 Greenland field seasons. John Ferguson, Non Executive Director – PhD, DSc, FAusIMM, Life Fellow Geological Society of South Africa Dr. John Ferguson has been involved in the minerals industry, academia and geological surveys for the past 40 years. He has conducted extensive exploration activities in Australia, southern Africa, Greenland, Canada, Chile, Mexico, Mongolia, and China in particular for diamonds, gold, platinum group elements, uranium and heavy mineral sands. Reg Gillard, Non-Executive Chairman – BA, FAICD, FASCPA, MRAJWA Reg Gillard has over 30 years experience in the formation, governance and financial maintenance of exploration and mining companies throughout the world. Brian Moller, Non Executive Director – LLB (Hons) Brian Moller is a corporate partner in the Brisbane based law firm HopgoodGanim where he has been a partner since 1983. He practices almost exclusively in the corporate area with an emphasis on capital raising, mergers and acquisitions.

  13. Skaergaard Project • Skaergaard, located on the coast of Eastern Greenland, has a Canadian NI 43-101 compliant Inferred Mineral Resource, based on over 20,000 metres of drilling. • 100% owned by Platina with no royalties payable on production. • Mineralisation consists primarily of palladium, gold and platinum within a titanium and vanadium-rich magnetite gabbro. • AMEC Minproc in conjunction with AMC Consultants completed the second stage of the pre-feasibility work by completing a review of a SRK Scoping Study. • High grade portion of the Gold Zone identified by AMC Consultants is to be the focus of a 2010 drilling campaign. • Pre-feasibility activities to continue in 2010.

  14. Skaergaard Project Inferred Resource Estimate * Inferred Resource Estimate calculated under Canadian National Instrument 43-101

  15. Skaergaard Project AMEC Minproc Pre-Feasibility Level Findings • Room and pillar mining has been identified as the preferred underground mining method, with operating costs ranging from US$ 49-81/t for conceptual underground mine development of 2.4Mtpa. • Capital expenditure estimate of US$166 million does not include infrastructure costs and has accuracy of + 40%. • Excellent bench-scale metallurgical recoveries of gold, palladium and platinum achieved from bulk samples – up to 92.7% gold recovery via flotation. • Compelling evidence suggesting a potentially higher-grade gold zone (>4g/t Au + PGM) within the previously defined Gold Zone – to be targeted by key 6,000 m diamond drilling program in 2010.

  16. Skaergaard Project Proposed 2010 Drilling Program • Distinctive trend – high grade Au located immediately above PGM-rich zone within Au zone. • Western border of the intrusion. • Region of coherent 2g/t and 3g/t contours identified within 7.5km² area. • Evidence that high grade area could contain combined grades >4g/t Au and PGM. • Increase drilling required to demonstrate continuity.

  17. Skaergaard Project Mining • AMC has concluded that none of the mining methods proposed by SRK would be suitable for a 6Mtpa operation. • AMC consider most practical method for mining Skaergaard to be apparent dip room and pillar utilisingmechanised mining equipment. • Slot stope mining and longwall mining discounted due to high labor costs. • Mining recovery 60%. • Dilution estimated to be 20%. • Low profile electric jumbos and loaders successfully utilised in room and pillar methods with 2m mining heights.

  18. Skaergaard Project Mining Concept • Mine the outcrop – have underground mining module at surface initially. • Drive decline through gold zone, process ore at surface. • Drive completed. • Mine underground. • High grade zone.

  19. Skaergaard Project Flotation • Rougher flotation test work to establish float response • P80 75µm • Natural pH 8 • Simple reagent suite: CuSO4 activator, PAX, A3477, Polyfroth

  20. Skaergaard Project Process Considerations • Consider harsh climatic conditions, terrain and restricted access (sea ice). • Minimise surface infrastructure and associated cost: • Cladding • Power (heating) • Cash flow • Produce dorē and concentrate • UNDERGROUND PROCESSING PLANT • REDUCED SURFACE INFRASTRUCTURE • REDUCED CAPEX/OPEX • REDUCED LABOUR COMPONENT • REDUCED POWER REQUIREMENT • CYANIDE FREE PROCESS ROUTE PREFERRED UNLESS SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC BENEFIT (TABLE TO DIRECT SMELT) • BY-PRODUCTS CREDITS NOT CONSIDERED • HPGR TECHNOLOGY – CAPITAL, OPEX, TRANSPORT LOGISTICS • MAXIMISE USE OF GRAVITY • REDUCED SURFACE INFRASTRUCTURE • REDUCED CAPEX/OPEX • IMPROVED NPV • IMPROVED CASH FLOW DUE TO HIGHER PAYABLE METAL CONTENT AND YEAR ROUND SHIPPING

  21. Skaergaard Project Proposed Drilling • To convert inferred to indicated in well established PGM areas drill hole spacing between 250m and 500m have been used. • AMC recommend deposit be drilled to 500m x 500m. • Area of economic interest to be drilled to 250m x 250m. 2010 field drill program – provide information on margins of 3ppm grade contour 2010 field drill program – 250m x250m infill drilling in area of economic interest

  22. MunniMunni Project • MunniMunni is located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. • Deposit 100% owned by Platina with no royalties payable on production. • JORC Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources of 24 million tonnes grading 2.9 g/t PGM’s and gold (1.4mt Inferred, 9.8mt Indicated, 12.4mt Measured). • Project acreage is 40 km from a deep water port and 8 km from rail access. • Grid power and groundwater is available on the project site. • Abundant skilled workforce is present nearby.

  23. MunniMunni Project Mineral Resource MunniMunniUndiluted Resource Estimate at a cut-off grade of 1.9g/t PGM + Au (SRK, 2002, subsequently confirmed by Snowden, 2003).

  24. MunniMunni Project • Updated conceptual study currently in progress by AMEC Minproc. Objectives of the study are: • To identify potential high-grade portions of the resource. • Review metallurgy and processing options. • Review possibility of on-site smelting. • Review opex and capex costs.

  25. Owendale Project – New Drilling Incentive

  26. Proposed Work Plan - 2010

  27. Proposed Work Plan - 2010

  28. Thank You

More Related