SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

COMMUNITY COLLABORATION PROJECT

tanek avatar
tanek
19 diapositives · 442 Views · Oct 08, 2014

COMMUNITY COLLABORATION PROJECT. Drew Evans, Bob Johansen, Isak Yoon November 8, 2010. COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP. Raise the bar with a challenge Embrace change Collaboration is key and it develops ownership. INDIVIDUAL IDEAS.

#community collaboration project #community collaboration project ppt #powerpoint #presentation
COMMUNITY COLLABORATION PROJECT - slide 1
01 / 19COMMUNITY COLLABORATION PROJECT
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

COMMUNITY COLLABORATION PROJECT
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. COMMUNITY COLLABORATION PROJECT Drew Evans, Bob Johansen, Isak Yoon November 8, 2010

  2. COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP • Raise the bar with a challenge • Embrace change • Collaboration is key and it develops ownership

  3. INDIVIDUAL IDEAS • Drew: “I would find a way to use sports to impact kids across the world and spread the gospel” • Bob: “Would find a way to surgically help children with a birth defect” • Isak: “I would organize a hands-across-the-world rally.”

  4. COLLABORATIVE PROCESS • We each had 3 very different ideas • Wanted a project that was practical and feasible, but challenging • Brainstormed using our common interests and resources

  5. BRAINSTORMING • Individual ideas coming together • Sawyer (2007) p. 61 • Osborn’s study: Increase effectiveness from individual brainstorming ideas collaboratively put together • We adopted that approach to our project. • We had our own ideas and met together to make our grand idea work • “Brainstorming is the most popular creativity technique of all time” (Sawyer, p. 60)

  6. BRAINSTORMING • We gravitated toward a common interest of athletics, connecting people and building community, and influencing the youth… in the good way • We brainstormed for new ideas & the best solution looking at our resources • Our best resources were: • Bob possessed a contact with Homework House • Drew is a coach for APU’s baseball team • Isak is the athletic trainer for APU’s volleyball team

  7. OUR GOAL • Organize community service based sports outreach clinics for local neighborhood students.

  8. CLINIC OBJECTIVES • God & Sports • Character Development • Skill Development • New Experiences • Create a new partnership

  9. APU BASEBALL • Golden State Athletic Conference winners in 2007 and 2008 • NAIA College World Series appearances in 2007 and 2008

  10. APU VOLLEYBALL • NAIA # 8 Volleyball team • 2 Consecutive NAIA national tournament berth 2008 and 2009 • 3 in last 4 Seasons

  11. HOMEWORK HOUSE • After-school program for city of Azusa community. • Mission is to establish and sustain neighborhood based learning centers in Azusa for at-risk children. • Reflect a holistic, neighborhood based approach to empowering at-risk children to thrive • Academically • Socially • Spiritually • www.onhh.org

  12. THE CLINICS • 2 Different Clinics • Baseball and Volleyball • October 7 and October 21 • 20-25 Kids from the Homework House participated • Baseball • Base-running, Outfield Drills, Infield Drills, Batting Practice, Homerun Derby • Volleyball • Serving, Passing, Attacking, Games to 15

  13. OUR COLLABORATION • We connected with our respected contacts individually • Stayed in contact with each other through e-mail • Met during Monday night classes to discuss our progress • We discussed how we were going to bring together the clinics and even the presentations

  14. CHALLENGES • Availability and willingness of Homework House to participate • Would they allow for their kids to participate on 2 separate dates • Availability and Scheduling with the teams • Location of clinics: APU vs. Homework House Campus • Logistics of getting kids to campus or bring players to kids • Availability of facility • Suitable equipment • Weather

  15. TRUST • We trusted the respective collaboration organizations to come through for us. • Homework House to fulfill commitment to bring kids to the clinics • Trusted each other to connect with our organizations to make the project possible. • We trusted that the teams would organize the clinics. • Did not know the extent the activities • We trusted each other to complete the project with the power point presentation and video.

  16. Who’s Line Is It Anyway? • Improvised selecting which sports and clinics to organize • Gave full rein of the running of the clinics to the athletics teams • Rain became a factor as far as bringing the kids to APU • No solidified contingency plan was made because weather was unpredictable based upon 5-day forecast • Impromptu transportation was devised

  17. GROUP FLOW • All members participating in the clinic, the athletes, the kids, the directors and organizers, bought into the objective behind the clinics and fully engaged • Blending egos • Constant communication through e-mail or in person • Equal participation • We all took a part in organizing the project

  18. TESTIMONIES • Bob • Drew • Isak

  19. COMMENT FROM HOMEWORK HOUSE DIRECTOR • Adrian ……