1 / 9

Strategic Decision Briefing on NOAA Policy Change

This standard presentation format outlines the purpose, issue, background, alternatives, coordination, output, and recommendation for a key decision or information briefing within NOAA. It includes key details such as the problem description, stakeholders involved, historical context, proposed alternatives with pros and cons, coordination efforts, expected output, and a specific recommendation.

tarak
Télécharger la présentation

Strategic Decision Briefing on NOAA Policy Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Attachment 8 NEC/NEP Standard Presentation Format Presenter’s Name Presenter’s Organization Presentation Date Date Page Numbers

  2. Outline • Purpose • Issue • Background & Discussion • Alternatives • Coordination and Views • Output • Recommendation

  3. Purpose • Decision or Information Briefing • Desired decision(s) • Applicable tasking

  4. Issue • Describe the issue; include • What is the problem/question/issue(s) • Who is involved • Both inside and outside NOAA • What is the desired outcome for the issue • Why this should be decided by the NEP or NEC

  5. Background & Discussion • Describe the background (only as necessary); include • Important past events – what brought us to this point • Relevant Administration, Congressional, or DoC statements, policies, opinions • Who has been involved in the discussion, both inside and outside NOAA • Describe the approach taken • How were the alternatives developed • What assumptions were used

  6. Alternatives • List alternatives (where we need to go & how to get there) • Strengths and Weaknesses (pros & cons) • Critical assumptions • Risk assessment • Fiscal ramifications (include offset or funding source if additional money is required to implement) • Alt 1 is the Status Quo • Alternatives should • provide end-to-end, integrated, NOAA-wide solutions • note if consistent/ inconsistent with other processes • provide implementation plan or “next steps”

  7. Coordination & NEP/Council Views • Coordination: • Line Offices • Staff Offices • Program managers/goal team leads • Other agencies • NEP/Council Views: • NEP • CFO Council (required for any recommendation that costs money) • Other Relevant Council(s)

  8. Output • Description of output or result • What does NOAA get for resources or policy change • capability • capacity • performance measures

  9. Recommendation • Recommend one of the alternatives

More Related