1 / 18

Implementing a House-wide Digital Telemetry System with Central Monitoring Room

Implementing a House-wide Digital Telemetry System with Central Monitoring Room. Alan Lipschultz Director, Clinical Engineering Christiana Care Health Services Newark, Delaware. Overall Outline. Why we embarked on project What changed Brief overview of system Decision Process

taran
Télécharger la présentation

Implementing a House-wide Digital Telemetry System with Central Monitoring Room

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementing a House-wide Digital Telemetry System with Central Monitoring Room Alan Lipschultz Director, Clinical Engineering Christiana Care Health Services Newark, Delaware

  2. Overall Outline • Why we embarked on project • What changed • Brief overview of system • Decision Process • WMTS vs 801.11 • IS Backbone vs stand alone network • Layers of system backup • Technical cooperation & Service Roles

  3. Christiana Care Health Services • 1000 bed, tertiary care, 2 campus system • Historically – Islands of telemetry for selected patient areas. No dedicated staff for watching monitors. • Currently – All telemetry (300 channels) monitored from Central Monitoring Room with dedicated monitor watchers

  4. Why we embarked on project • Frequent alarms, paper ran into waste basket • Nurses tended to ignore low level alarms • Two sentinel events – low level alarm ignored & patient expired • Severe bed crunch with ED diverts • No more UHF channels available

  5. What Changed • Central Monitoring Room (CMR) remote from clinical units • monitor watchers, not nurses • CMR staff delivers, applies and retrieves telemetry boxes • Almost any Non-ICU bed can become a telemetry bed • Major culture change for nurses and physicians • System onto IS network backbone

  6. Brief overview of system • 328 channels of telemetry • 802.11 protocol in 2.4 GHz ISM band • System resides on main hospital backbone using virtual LAN • Full two way communication between network and telemetry units • Access points provide “cellular-like” communications with telemetry units • Telemetry units have ECG display on front of unit. Works independent of network.

  7. Overall Process • Clinical/political decision to implement centralized system • Search for best vendor to meet goals of clinicians • Decision to put system on IS network backbone • Implementation

  8. Decision Process • Clinical vision established first • Wanted extremely flexible system • Early on - decided to utilize IS backbone • When we were looking (late 2000), technology was cutting edge • Different market today • Much uncertainty in market (WMTS vs ISM band)

  9. WMTS vs ISM 802.11 system • Did not feel WMTS was good option • Bandwidth too limiting • Proprietary, no standards • one way communications • at the time we were making decision, most systems were identical to conventional telemetry system we were replacing.

  10. WMTS vs ISM 802.11 system • 802.11 industry standard for all sorts of devices • Inter-connectivity w/non-medical & medical devices • Lower cost • infrastructure can be reused • Concerns about sharing ISM Band • If “rogue” device were to come into institution, would not be able to connect to anything without proper codes • Frequency hopping was originally designed to hop around any interference that does occur • No issue coexisting with 802.11b applications

  11. IS Backbone vs Stand Alone Network • Fully switched IS network with VLAN technology • Knew that system would be all over institution. Access Points, terminals, printers • Some floors only had a few Access Points • Closet space extremely tight

  12. IS Backbone vs Stand Alone Network (cont) • Utilize existing infrastructure (cost) • Good cooperation between Clinical Engineering and Information Services • IS really set up for complex network management • UDP Packets • VLAN technology didn’t initially provide quality of service

  13. Layers of System Backup • High Availability (HA) servers with RAID. (“A” and “B”) Physically separated in different rooms • Redundant network switches – one for “A” and one for “B” set of servers • Any telemetry device can be used anywhere in system • Redundant coverage for Access Points • Redundant telephone switch • Two way communication between telemetry devices and rest of system • If communications lost, telemetry device automatically reverts to local mode with ECG display on face

  14. Implementation • Process/cultural changes much more difficult than technical implementation • First CMR adjacent to nursing unit

  15. Couldn’t work w/o close technical cooperation • Vendor - hardware, software & 24x7 technical support • Information Services group - network infrastructure, network printers, UPS units, 24x7 network monitoring • CE – front line repairs, bridge between technical and clinical world, IS & vendor & clinicians, installation coordination

  16. Definition of service roles • How is problem noticed • User • LAN notification • System notification • CE primarily responsible. Initially most issues were IS or vendor • IS handles network issues • Vendor plays an integral service role

  17. Communications is the key!

  18. QUESTIONS?

More Related