1 / 14

WP6 Evaluation

WP6 Evaluation. EuroHealthNet. Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator. 41 members and partners in 27 European countries. NORWAY: Norwegian Directorate of Health POLAND: National Institute of Hygiene – Public Health Research Institute

tariq
Télécharger la présentation

WP6 Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP6 Evaluation EuroHealthNet Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator

  2. 41 members and partners in 27 European countries NORWAY: Norwegian Directorate of Health POLAND: National Institute of Hygiene – Public Health Research Institute ROMANIA: Institute of Public Health Iasi SCOTLAND: NHS Health Scotland SLOVAKIA: Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic SLOVENIA: • National Institute of Public Health • Institute of Public Health MurskaSobota SPAIN: • Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo • Universidad de La Laguna SWEDEN: Stockholm County Council SWITZERLAND: Health Promotion Switzerland WALES: Public Health Wales IRELAND Institute of Public Health MONTENEGRO Institute of Public Health ROMANIA National Institute of Public Health SWEDEN Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions • AUSTRIA: Austrian Health Promotion Foundation • BELGIUM: Flemish Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention • BULGARIA: National Centre of Public Health Protection • CROATIA: National Institute of Public Health • CZECH REPUBLIC: National Institute of Public Health • DENMARK: National Board of Health • UK: • Department of Health • • Kent & Medway NHS • • North West Health Office • ESTONIA: National Institute for Health Development • FRANCE: National Institute for Prevention and Health Education (INPES) • FINLAND: Finnish Centre for Health Promotion • GERMANY: Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) • GREECE: Institute of Preventive Medicine, Environmental & • Occupational Health Prolepsis • FINLAND: National Institute for Health and Welfare • Finnish Society for Social and Health - SOSTE • HUNGARY: • Hungarian National Institute for Health Development (OEFI) • • University of Debrecen • ITALY: Veneto Region • LATVIA: The Centre of Health Economics • NETHERLANDS: • NIGZ: Netherlands Institute for Health Promotion • • RIVM: Netherlands Institute Public Health and the Environment

  3. - Reducing Health Inequalities- Combat NCDs- Health Promotion for sustainable health systems Policy development Project participation Networking Communication

  4. Health Inequalities are persistent and increasing

  5. EuroHealthNetThe European Partnership for Improving Healthy Equity and Wellbeing HPE Health Promotion Europe The European Network for Health Promotion PHASE The European Platform for Action on Health & Social Equity CIRI The European Centre for Innovation, Research & Implementation in Health & Wellbeing The EuroHealthNet Secretariat, Executive and General Councils

  6. Evaluation WHY? • To support Consortium performance; • To collectively identify and respond to problems; • To maximise impact and ensure sustainability. HOW? Through project’s products, interviews and questionnaires WHO? All project partners

  7. AHA.SI Evaluation Draft Evaluation Framework based on project’s work-plan, timeframe, deliverables including process, output and outcome indicators to be commented by WP leads and agreed by all • Guiding Principles for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations; • The Active Ageing Index; • Social Investment Package.

  8. AHA.SI Evaluation • Review processes: meetings, event reports; questionnaires and interviews; • Analyseoutputs: schedule and content (3 external experts); • Assess outcomes: stakeholders views on impact • 3 interim reports and one final report

  9. Logic model: Networking Awareness campaign Strategy (3 position papers) Networking Conferences Review of best practices Situation analysis Higher public awareness Feasibility of Strategy Cooperation health and social sectors policy More seniors employed More active and healthy seniors More LTC ..

  10. Examples Specific objective: Network of different sectors at different levels • Process indicators: no. of meetings organised, reports, etc.; • Output indicators: satisfaction and impact; follow up colaborations(questionnaires, interviews) • Outcome indicators: the network allows better strategy implementation (interviews)

  11. Examples Specific objective: Greater public and target groups awareness • Process indicators: campaign, communication (WP5 products) • Output indicators: no. of people reached, materials produced, no. of events dissemination etc. • Outcome indicators: public awareness evaluation study

  12. Short-term outcomes:public awareness

  13. Example: networking

  14. Thank you! Cristina Chiotan c.chiotan@eurohealthnet.eu Ingrid Stegeman i.stegeman@eurohealthnet.eu Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator

More Related