1 / 132

Getting Serious about School Reform:

Getting Serious about School Reform:. Three Critical Commitments Districts and Schools Should Make. 40 Years. Same Problems. The problem isn’t at the classroom teacher level. The problem is at the systems level. Tentative Findings Reading. Tentative Findings Reading.

taryn
Télécharger la présentation

Getting Serious about School Reform:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Getting Serious about School Reform: Three Critical Commitments Districts and Schools Should Make

  2. 40 Years Same Problems

  3. The problem isn’t at the classroom teacher level. The problem is at the systems level.

  4. TentativeFindings Reading

  5. Tentative Findings Reading

  6. Tentative Findings Reading

  7. Tentative Findings Reading

  8. TentativeFindings Reading

  9. TentativeFindings Mathematics

  10. Districts and schools must find ways to ensure effective practices occur in every classroom, but still provide flexibility to the classroom teacher.

  11. For decades we have operated from the belief that this is impossible in U.S. education.

  12. Weick (1976,1982)Tightly Coupled Organizations… • Clearly defined unit of accountability • Clearly defined criterion for success • Clear understanding of what produces success • Entire system mobilizes when criterion for success is not met.

  13. Weick’s Conclusions Districts and schools are not tightly coupled regarding individual student achievement as the unit of analysis for success.

  14. Weick’s Conclusions Districts and schools are not tightly coupled regarding the criterion of student achievement, BUT THEY ARE TIGHTLY COUPLED REGARDING THE BUS SCHEDULE AND PAYROLL.

  15. Based on the notion that schools are inherently loosely-coupled we began operating from a “hands offs” pespective at the classroom level.

  16. Everybody is equal.The classroom teacher is an autonomous, independent contractor.

  17. Within a loosely coupled district or school, there will be individual points of light but no possibility of a strong, unified focus that can eradicate the 40 year old problems inherent in the system.

  18. Bellamy and Colleagues (2005)Highly Reliable Organizations (HROs)

  19. Bellamy and Colleagues (2005)Highly Reliable Organizations (HROs)… • Clearly defined unit of accountability • Clearly defined criterion for success • Clear understanding of what produces success • Entire system mobilizes when criterion for success is not met.

  20. Bellamy’s Conclusions Districts and schools are not tightly coupled (HROs) regarding individual student achievement as the unit of analysis for success.

  21. Bellamy’s Conclusions Districts and schools are not tightly coupled regarding the criterion of student achievement, BUT THEY CAN BE IF THEY ARE WILLING TO COMMIT TO SPECIFIC ACTIONS THAT ARE DISTRICTWIDE (OR SCHOOLWIDE).

  22. Three Critical Interventions (COMMITMENTS) • A system of individual student feedback on learning goals at the classroom, school, and district levels (standards-based grading using formative assessments) • Ensuring effective teaching in every classroom • Building background knowledge for all students

  23. All three can be approached at the school level but are more powerful at the district level.

  24. Three Critical Interventions(COMMITMENTS) • A system of individual student feedback on learning goals at the classroom, school, and district levels (standards-based grading using formative assessments) • Ensuring effective teaching in every classroom • Building background knowledge for all students

  25. Phase I: Track student progress using a formatively-based system.

  26. This draws on the research from formative assessments.

  27. Feedback from classroom assessments should provide students with a clear picture of their progress on learning goals and how they might improve. Bangert-Drowns, Kulik, Kulik, & Morgan,1991

  28. Feedback from classroom assessments should provide students with a clear picture of their progress on learning goals and how they might improve. Fuchs & Fuchs 1988

  29. You can’t rely on the 100-point scale.

  30. A. Items 1–10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught Total for section = B. Items 11–14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. Total for section = C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught Total for section = Total /100

  31. A. Items 1–10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught /40 Total for section= B. Items 11–14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. /40 Total for section= C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught /20 Total for section= Total /100

  32. A. Items 1–10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught Total for section = /40 + All correct B. Items 11–14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. /40 Total for section = Two correct + C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught Total for section = /20 None correct Total /100

  33. A. Items 1–10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught Total for section = 40/40 All correct + B. Items 11–14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. Total for section = 20/40 Two correct + C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught Total for section = 0/20 None correct Total /100 60

  34. Scale

  35. Scale

  36. Scale

  37. Scale

  38. Scale

  39. Scale

  40. Scale

  41. A. Items 1–10 (SCORE 2.0) Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught ALL CORRECT B. Items 11–14 (SCORE 3.0) Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. 2 OF 4 CORRECT C. Item 15–16 (SCORE 4.0) Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught NONE CORRECT RUBRIC SCORE= 2.5

  42. This represents a shift from an emphasis on isolated classroom activities for which points are assigned to an emphasis on student progression toward specific learning goals.

  43. This approach is to be used as another measurement tool in a system of inherently imprecise measurement tools.

  44. Cizek (2007) State test for a large Midwestern state: rel = .87 Subscales:Estimation and mental computation, geometry, measurement, number and number relations, patterns, algebra, problem solving Subscale reliabilities = .33 to .57

  45. Cizek (2007) State test for a large Midwestern state: rel = .87 Subscales:Estimation and mental computation, geometry, measurement, number and number relations, patterns, algebra, problem solving Subscale reliabilities = .33 to .57 Reliability of differences scores = .015

More Related