1 / 14

Henry Kranendonk kranendhx@milwaukee.k12.wi

Preparing Math Teachers as Instructional Coaches of Urban Classrooms at Small (Gates) High Schools & Schools in Need of Improvement. Henry Kranendonk kranendhx@milwaukee.k12.wi.us Mathematics Curriculum Specialist Milwaukee Public Schools

tate
Télécharger la présentation

Henry Kranendonk kranendhx@milwaukee.k12.wi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preparing Math Teachers as Instructional Coaches of Urban Classrooms at Small (Gates) High Schools & Schools in Need of Improvement Henry Kranendonk kranendhx@milwaukee.k12.wi.us Mathematics Curriculum SpecialistMilwaukee Public Schools Henry S. Kepner, Jr. kepner@uwm.eduDepartment of Curriculum & Instruction and Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee National Council of Supervisors of MathematicsAnnual Meeting, Atlanta, GA March 20, 2007

  2. Mentoring “new” staff –the unfunded mandate • Acting as a sponsor • Encouraging self-reliance • Encouraging true collegiality • Encouraging reflection on practice • Provide timely, appropriate feedback

  3. Sharing Reflecting Supporting Mentoring is NOT Evaluating Substituting Mentoring is:

  4. To consult To collaborate To Coach Mentoring Roles:

  5. Consult: share vital information • Procedural expectations • Building/district policy, materials, access to resources • Craft of teaching: establishing classroom routines, instructional strategies, assessments

  6. Share the “Why” of actions, options: • Think aloud about your own…. “Why’s”, “What’s” and “How’s” • Offer a menu • Produce an idea bank • Conduct a model lesson (label critical attributes) • Review tapes of teaching • Reference, highlight current research

  7. Collaborate: co-develop the information pool. • Shared analysis • Problem solving • Decision-making and • Reflection

  8. Collaboration Activity Examine a 9th grade constructed response assessment. Teacher and coach: Describe what misconceptions and mistakes your students would bring to this assessment Teacher and coach: Describe what you expect your students will do to develop this assessment - and why! Teacher and coach: Describe what a student must develop to be considered proficient with this activity.

  9. (5) Teacher and coach: Design a “meets expectation” / “does not meet expectation” rubric to the Task Features (6) Analyze each student’s work to assessment (7) Provide feedback (8) Summarize

  10. Reciprocal nature – support mutual learning, growth, respect. • Brainstorm with colleague: • Reasons, • ideas, • solutions, • Intervention • Co-plan • Co-teach

  11. Coaching Goal: to empower a colleague’s expertise in: • Planning, • Reflecting on practice, and • Instructional decision-making – • Focused on student learning of mathematics.

  12. Coaching responsibilites: • Maintain a nonjudgmental stance • Inquire about “What’s” and “Why’s” • Focus on successes towards colleague’s goal • Focus on colleague’s concerns. (Be prepared to focus on whatever the colleague raises as an area of concern.) • Reflect on goals.

  13. References • Burns, Marilyn, Silbey, Robyn. (2000) So you have to teach math? Sound advice for K-6. teachers. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications. ISBN: 0-941355-29-2. • Costa, A., Garmstorn, R. (2002) Cognitive Coaching: A foundation for Renaissance Schools. 2nd Edition Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers. ISBN: 0-926842-37-4 • DePaul, Amy. (1998?) Survival Guide for New Teachers: How new teachers can work effectively with veteran teachers, parents, principals, and teacher educators. US Dept. of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. www.ed.gov • Grant, Scott Nelson, et.al. (2003) Lenses on Learning.Dale Seymour Publications. • Huinker, D., Freckmann, J. (2004) Focusing Conversations to Promote Teacher Thinking. TCM. • Lipton, L., Wellman, B. (2003) Mentoring Matters : A Practical Guideto Learning-Focused Relationships. Sherman, CT : Mira Via. • NCTM. Lester (2003) Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving, Prekindergarten-Grade 6.

  14. References Continued • NCTM. Schoen (2003) Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving. Grades 6-12 • NCTM. Navigations collection. • NCTM. (2004) Empowering the Beginning Teacher of Mathematics in : • Chappell, M., Schielack, J., & Zagorski, S. Elementary School ; • Chappell, M. & Pateracki. Middle School ; • Chappell, M., Choppin, J., & Salls, J. High School. • National Research Council (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division • Stein, Mary Kay, Smith, M., Henningsen, M. & Silver, E. (2000) Implementing Standards-based Mathematics Instruction. NY: Teachers College Press and NCTM. • West, L.& Staub, F. (2003) Content-Focused Coaching : Transforming Mathematics Lessons. Heinemann.

More Related