1 / 48

Damien Kavanagh School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Queen’s University Belfast N. Ireland

To what extent do experiences of using services or caring for someone influence the perspectives and practice of social work students at Queen’s University Belfast?. Damien Kavanagh School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Queen’s University Belfast N. Ireland. About me.

tawny
Télécharger la présentation

Damien Kavanagh School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Queen’s University Belfast N. Ireland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To what extent do experiences of using services or caring for someone influence the perspectives and practice of social work students at Queen’s University Belfast? Damien Kavanagh School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Queen’s University Belfast N. Ireland

  2. About me • A Dad and Partner • Mental health experiences within myself and my family • Mental Health Social Worker • Pre-employment checks and disclosure – ‘Risk?’ • Background in (passion for) mental health peer advocacy • Graduate student (MRes) • I am nervous

  3. Aims of enquiry • To identify and explore the levels of health and social care service use, and caring responsibilities, among social work students at Queen’s University Belfast. • Investigate the prevalence of client and carer self-identification among a population of social work students. • Investigate the level of self-identification and disclosure among social work students.

  4. Aims of enquiry • Identify whether and to what extent the social work students perceive clients and carers as ‘other’ than themselves. • Consider whether a relationship exists between the policy, practice and identity issues involved. • This study also sought to explore whether future social workers presume that the people they will work with and support are vulnerable or oppressed.

  5. Northern Ireland Context • 1.7 million population • Legacy of the conflict • Sectarianism • Increasing diversity • Integrated service - issues • Community and Voluntary Sector

  6. Unionism / Loyalism

  7. Nationalism / Republicanism

  8. ‘Belfastism’

  9. Terminology and language Challenges in defining categories (McLaughlin, 2009). Service user: someone who has used or uses services in Health and Social Care. Caregiver: someone who has or has had an on-going emotional or practical interest in the wellbeing of a service user.

  10. Social context • Society emerging post-conflict. • Disability issues were not the main concern. • Conflict issues were and are not the main concern for many disabled citizens and caregivers. • Social Work part of an integrated Health and Social Care setting.

  11. Legislative context • The Special Educational Needs and Disability Order (SENDO) 1 September 2005. • Extended Disability Discrimination Act 1995 to ensure equal opportunities in Higher Education. • Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (aka Good Friday Agreement). • Duty on public bodies to promote equality of opportunity.

  12. Disclosure • Disclosure is the responsibility of the student, as a personal decision. • Unclear how students may be facilitated in addressing barriers to self-disclosure within context of personal choice. • Notion of ‘process’ in a fluid ecological context, as opposed to single event.

  13. Identity • Fluid discourses, subjectively significant experiences and categorisation (Chapell et al, 2003; Goffman, 1958) • Individual agency and power imbalances (Clark, 2006) • Opportunities for identity redefinition (Foucault, 1994) • ‘Otherness’ and professional socialisation, denying personal experiences (Clouder, 2001)

  14. Identity Evidence-informed practice and objectivity in context of humanity and subjectivity (Wiles, 2011) Disability as a medical, personal tragedy (Oliver and Sapey, 2006) Fear of disclosure and unfitness to practise (Wray et al, 2005)

  15. Citizen involvement • Citizen leadership increasingly central to social work education (Farrow and Fillingham, 2011) research (Rose, 2008; Kavanagh et al, 2012), policy and practice (Duffy, 2008). • Service users and caregivers involved in design and delivery of curriculum and regulation of workforce. • Helps reduce distance between experience and interpretation (Beresford, 2007). • Potential for over-involvement (Rose, 2008).

  16. Social work as an entity • Multi-disciplinary, integrated nature of health and social care and marginalisation of social work (Judd and Sheffield, 2010). • Regulatory requirements, heightened accountability as ‘surveillance’ of workers (McLaughlin, 2010). • Target and performance driven philosophy (Heffernan, 2006).

  17. Higher Education • Structural and institutional norms which differ from students’ culture and values (Reay et al, 2010). • Internships compound this with organisational norms (Hughes et al, 2007). • Diversity of and micro-political nature of internship settings exacerbate issue (Dutton and Worsley, 2009).

  18. Methodology Sample • Phase one: Initial purposive sample across BSW (Bachelor of Social Work) undergraduate program (n=122). • Phase two: Convenience sample of a priori criteria – those who self-identify as service user, caregiver or both.

  19. Methodology Data collection • Mixed method – Phase one survey (using Personal Response System) • Phase two semi-structured interviews. • Interview and survey schedule. • Informed consent. Analysis • Subjective experiences warranted inductive approach. • SPSS and thematic framework.

  20. Results and analysis Table1: Frequency of survey participants by gender

  21. Disabled students Table 2: Frequency table of cohort by disability, as disclosed.

  22. As a future social worker do you regard service users as different from you? Table 3: Frequency table of cohort’s views regarding service users.

  23. Please indicate if you have ever used or are using services beyond Primary Care. Table 4 : Breakdown of service use beyond primary care.

  24. Self-identification and otherness

  25. Interviews • Available sample = 20 • Actual sample = 6 social work students

  26. Future practitioner profiles • ‘Rita’ : Initial child protection social work assessment in respect of her own children. Past and current experiences as a carer for her father, who lives with physical support needs. • ‘Stephanie’: Prior use of cancer services. Present experiences as a consequence of having used these services, in terms of the physical and emotional effects of treatment . • ‘Rose’: A caregiver for her brother, who lives with an intellectual disability.

  27. Future practitioner profiles • ‘Barbara’: Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in respect of her son. Lived experiences of a parent who lives with alcohol addiction. • ‘Anna’: Someone living with epilepsy in addition to experiences as a child and adult with a parent who lives with alcohol addiction. • ‘Ursula’: Experienced sexual abuse as a child, and on-going mental health needs who made use of counselling services in relation to these experiences. Experiences of living in and leaving local authority care.

  28. Questions • Influence on how they perceive themselves. • Influence of how others perceive them. • How their experiences have influenced their approaches to social work. • Their readiness to disclose their experiences in a public setting.

  29. Labelling, otherness and sameness “Now that I’m a social worker I don’t want to give too much away.... I view my illness and how it shaped my life differently.... I remember the first day .... thinking, ‘What are people going to think about someone on crutches? I need to get off crutches before I go on placement’. ... I was always conscious that it was about me feeling different from other people, and that all came from being sick.” ‘Stephanie’

  30. Self-labelling “I made the realisation that I’m a carer and not just a family member. I could see people around me answering differently.... my life experiences are different from everyone else’s.... It’s more than being a sister; I don’t know any of my friends who would be mothering their 16 year old brother.” ‘Rose’

  31. Sameness “I think it’s important to think through past experiences and be aware of the potential impact on people. I’m no different from anyone else.... Our lives are basically the same as the people we are going to be offering support to. We’ve just been a bit luckier with the circumstances, and I think that’s the only difference.” ‘Barbara’

  32. Language “It’s all about the words that you use. People are in contact with social services for a reason, but it’s always ‘service user vulnerable’, not ‘service user strong’. It’s about the pathology of service user status and experiences, people need to practice thinking about people in a different light, as experts on themselves.” ‘Ursula’

  33. Balance and Fluidity “I have grown as a person... I am a professional and I bring my life experiences. I will not deny these; they’ll not be put in a box. .... I now know the other side of the relationship.... I always check how I think about things; it’s about personal and professional safety.” ‘Ursula’

  34. Disclosure Reinforcing good practice. “My family and my Gateway experience was a more positive experience and I would be more willing to share this. I wouldn’t be though if it had been a bad experience.” ‘Rita’

  35. Disclosure Social justice and advocacy. “Yes, when I have to stand up for them when someone makes a remark....I felt hurt and insulted, but now that I’m on the social work course I’m trying to handle situations better.... I don’t want him (brother) to be an object or subject to be talked about.” ‘Rose’

  36. Disclosure Access to accommodations, institutional and personal. “I did, mostly for support materials and to increase my accessibility. The previous University didn’t ask and I didn’t tell them. I had friends from school with me who supported me.” ‘Anna’

  37. Disclosure Ownership and protection of experiences “I said a couple of sentences but didn’t say too much detail about it. I think that if you bring your life experience and once you put it out there someone else owns your personal information.” ‘Ursula’

  38. Other emergent themes • Experience-informed practice, linking experience to interpretation. • Positivity and expertise. • Balanced approach to negotiating multiple identities within a context of fluidity and professionalization. • Institutions facilitating service users and caregivers on the program to contribute to learning. • Fitness to practise.

  39. Limitations • My lived experiences and potential bias. Regular reflections in supervision assisted. • Possibility of desirable responses from interviewees. • Limited sampling frame in context of academic timetable. The good grace of students and teaching staff facilitated this. • Challenges in migrating data from the Personal Response System to SPSS. • Survey - level of non-response for each question. • Interview sample limited from the point of view of gender, as no males were recruited for interview.

  40. Conclusions • Subjective interpretations of user and carer self-identification exist. Who owns disclosure? • The extent to which this cohort of students perceive service users and carers as ‘other’ than themselves is also significant. • Variances in perceptions of experiences, ranging from presumed vulnerability to presumed strength, hope and opportunity (Sakamoto and Pitner, 2005). • Sensitivities to the concept of holding blurred and fluid identities as human beings, as opposed to binary relationships between lived experiences and professional work practice (Chapell et al, 2003).

  41. Conclusions • Disclosure underpinned by a critical tension between individual agency and professional socialisation (Clark, 2006). • Pertinent questions about social work education and practice as a potentially and paradoxically oppressive forum for practitioners with lived experiences, and whether or not meaningful supports exist for these people (Webber and Robinson, 2011). • Further research explicitly in relation to the concept of ‘otherness’.

  42. A final word on Northern Ireland .....

  43. References Beresford, P. and Croft, S. (2004) Service Users and Practitioners Reunited: The Key Component for Social Work Reform, British Journal of Social Work 34 (1): 53-68. Beresford, P. (2007) The Changing Roles and Tasks of Social Work from Service Users’ Perspectives: A literature informed discussion paper, London: Shaping Our Lives/General Social Care Council. Beresford, P. (2008) ‘We don’t see her as a social worker’: a service user case study of the importance of the social worker’s relationship and humanity. British Journal of Social Work, 38(7): 1388-1407. Chappell, C., Rhodes, C., Solomon, N., Tennant. M. and Yates, L. (2003) Reconstructingthe Lifelong Learner: pedagogy and identity in individual, organisational and socialchange, London: RoutledgeFalmer. Clark, C. (2006) Moral character in social work,British Journal of Social Work, 36(1):75-89. Cooper, A. (2008) Social work [electronic resource] : an introduction to contemporary practice, Harlow: Pearson Longman.

  44. References • Cooper, H. (2006) Involving service users in interprofessional education narrowing the gap between theory and practice, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20(6):603-17 • Clouder, D.L. (2001) Becoming Professional: An Exploration of the Social Construction of Identity, Warwick: University of Warwick. • Duffy, J. (2008) Looking out from the middle: user involvement in health and social care - www.scie.org.uk/publications/reports/rep18.asp - accessed 1st March 2013. • Dutton. A. and Worsley, A. (2009) ‘Doves and hawks: practice educators’ attitudestowardsinterprofessional learning’, Learning in Health and Social Care, 8(3): 45-153. • Farrow, K. and Fillingham, J. (2011) ‘Promises and Pitfalls: Involving Service Users and Carers in Social Work Manager Education’, Social Work Education, 30: 1-13. • Foucault, M. (1994) ‘The subject and power’, in J.D. Faubion, (ed) Power: Essentialworks of Foucault 1954 – 1984, volume 3, London, Penguin Books. • Goffman, E. (1959) ‘Presentation of Self in Everyday Life’, New York: Doubleday.

  45. References Hughes, J., Jewson., N., and Unwin, L. (2007) Communities of Practice: CriticalPerspectives, London, Routledge. Judd, R.G., and Sheffield, S. (2010) Hospital Social Work: Contemporary Roles and Professional Activities, Social Work in Health Care, 49(10): 856-871 Kavanagh, D., Daly, M., Harper, M. and Campbell, J. (2012) ‘Mental health service users and carers as researchers: reflections on a qualitative study of citizens' experiences of compulsory mental health laws in Northern Ireland,’ in Goodson, L. and Phillimore, J. (2012) Community Research for Participation: From Theory to Method, Bristol: Policy Press. Manthorpe, J., Rappaport, J. and Stanley, N. (2009) Expertise and Experience: People with Experiences of Using Services and Carers' Views of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, British Journal of Social Work, 39(5): 884-900. McLaughlin, H. (2009) ‘What’s in a Name: ‘Client’, ‘Patient’, ‘Customer’, ‘Consumer’, ‘Expert by Experience’, ‘Service User’—What’s Next?’ British Journal of Social Work, 39: 1101–1117. Oliver, M. & Sapey, B. (2006) Social Work with Disabled People, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Robinson, K. and Webber, M. (2013) Models and Effectiveness of Service User and Carer Involvement in Social Work Education: A Literature Review, British Journal of Social Work, 43: 925-944.

  46. References Rose, D., Fleischman, P. and Wykes, T. (2008) 'What are mental health service users' priorities for research in the UK?', Journal of Mental Health,17(5): 520-530. Reay, D., Crozier, G., and Clayton, J. (2010) ‘‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: working-classstudents in UK higher education’, British Educational Research Journal, 36 (1):107-124. Sakamoto, I. & Pitner, R. (2005) Use of Critical Consciousness in Anti-Oppressive Social Work Practice: Disentangling Power Dynamics at Personal and Structural Levels, British Journal of Social Work,35: 435-452. Webb, S. A. (2006) Social Work in a Risk Society: Social and Political Perspectives, Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke. Webber, M. and Robinson, K. (2011) ‘The meaningful involvement of service users andcarers in advanced-level post-qualifying social work education: A qualitative study’,British Journal of Social Work, 10: 1093 Wiles, F. (2011). Professional registration and the discursive construction of social work students’ identities. EdD thesis, The Open University. Wray, J., Fell, B., Stanley, N., Manthorpe, J., and Coyne, E. (2005), Final Report of ThePEdDS Project: disabled social work students and placements, University of Hull, [Online] http://www2.hull.ac.uk/fhsc/pdf/PEDDS%20final%20report.pdf (accessed 10.05.13).

More Related