Advanced I/O Techniques for Efficient Process Crash Recovery: A Comprehensive Presentation

1. Advanced I/O Techniques for Efficient and Highly Available Process Crash Recovery Protocols Thesis Presentation Jason Cornwell 03/15/2011

2. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

3. Computing Intensive Applications

4. Network Centric Services

5. Recent Advances

6. Motivation & Goals Demand for more computing power and high-bandwidth network connections Advances in Microprocessors and Networks Parallel Computing Performance and Scalability Reliability and Availability Simplicity and Accessibility

7. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

8. Reliability Problems Large numbers of CPUs, Memory Modules, Hard Disk Drives, Network Interfaces, Network Switches Low Mean-Time-To-Failure (MTTF) and/or High Failure-In-Time (FIT)

9. Classification of Failure • Transient Failure • Power glitch • System patch and reboot • ECC trap • Partial “Permanent” Failure • Disk failure • Partial network failure • Wholesale “Permanent” Failure • Total hardware failure • Natural disaster

10. Availability Problems Large numbers Processes, Threads, Software Barriers, Busy Waiting Temporarily Unresponsive and/or Unavailable

11. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

12. Possible Solutions • Transient Failure • Restart/replay/resume on the same node • Task-migration is possible • Permanent Partial Failure • Rebalance the workload on surviving nodes • Partial task-migration is needed • Permanent Wholesale Failure • Reconfigure the applications and services • Massive task-migration to new platform

13. Checkpointing • Common feature in high-performance computing (HPC) platforms • Saves the execution state • Application or system-level • Mechanism for task migration

14. Application vs System Level • Application-level Recovery Point • Developed application specific • Generally smaller footprint • Data accessiblity restrictions • Kernel-level Recovery Point • Snapshot processes • Full resource restoration • Flexibility due to system level preemption

15. Berkeley Labs Checkpoint/Restart • System-level • Kernel-module • Checkpoint creation implemented • Process recovery implemented • Linked to BLCR libraries at execution • Stores checkpoint data locally (stack, heap, registers, signals, etc.)

16. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

17. Contribution • Enhanced BLCR performance through latency tolerant technique • Increased BLCR availability through novel checkpoint creation technique

18. I/O Optimization • Avoided extreme modification to BLCR • Reduce the disk latency of checkpoint creation • Implemented a caching technique • Improved I/O performance 4-fold or more • System overhead less than 300KB in experimental test results

19. Checkpoint Caching • Buffer used as temporary storage • Storage block flushed in large volume • Trade-off between resource consumption and improved I/O efficiency cr_copy(chkptData, count) if(chkptBuf is NULL) kmalloc size of count for chkptBuf space; copy chkptData into chkptBuf; else kmalloc size of count + chkptBuf size for tempBuf space; copy chkptBuf into tempBuf; krealloc chkptBuf for its expanded size; memmove tempBuf into chkptBuf; kfree memory for tempBuf; end if

20. Optimized Write Operation

21. Remote Checkpoint • BLCR is limited to local disk storage • Remote checkpoint offers off-site storage option • Uses sockets to transmit data • Needs predefined destination • Outperforms BLCR in some experimental tests

22. Remote Checkpoint Server • Single thread daemon • Used GCC compiler • Stores the recovery point external to the client node • Could be ported to Microsoft derivative while(true) create socket; bind to address; listen for incoming connections; wait for client to connect; create file descriptor; while(data buffered received) write checkpoint data; close file descriptor; close socket;

23. Modified Write Operation • TCP packets • MTU must be reached before delivery • Only modification is to the write operation of BLCR if(remote chkpt) if(socket is NULL) create socket; establish connection, if handshake fails break and perform the original_chkpt; end if package checkpoint data; send data message; end if if(original_chkpt) original BLCR write operation; end if

24. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

25. Design I/O Optimization Write Remote Checkpoint Write write(chkptData, count) if(chkptBuf has space for the incoming chkptData) cr_copy(ckptData, count); else vfs_write(chkptBuf); vfs_write(chkptData); kfree(chkptBuf); end if

26. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

27. Experimental Setup I/O Optimization Remote Checkpoint Dell PowerEdge 700, 2.80 GHz Dual-processor Intel Pentium 4, 3 GB Memory, 5,400 RPM Hard Disk, Linux 2.6 Dell Workstation, 3.06 GHz Intel Pentium 4, 1 GB Memory, 5,400 RPM Hard Disk, Linux 2.6 BLCR Implementation BLCR with NFS (BLCR+NFS) BLCR with our Remote Checkpoint Technique (BLCR+R) • Dell Workstation, 3.06 GHz Intel Pentium 4, 1 GB Memory, 5,400 RPM Hard Disk, Linux 2.6 • BLCR Implementation • Optimized BLCR (O-BLCR) Implementation

28. Benchmarks Program Resource Utilization • NP-Complete • Data Encryption • Linear Equation Solver • File Compression

29. I/O Optimization Results

30. Remote Checkpoint Results

31. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

32. Conclusion • Minimal modification to BLCR • I/O optimization technique reduced the write latency of BLCR • Remote checkpoint increases BLCR availability with new feature • These techniques should be deployed into the foundation of BLCR source code

33. Agenda • Introduction • Challenges • Pertinent Background • Proposed Techniques • Implementations • Experimental Setup & Results • Conclusions • Future Work

34. Future Work • Server authentication protocol • Data packet encryption • Automated process load balancing

35. Questions