1 / 9

New Seats 1 st Period U.S.! The number by your name is the number of your desk

New Seats 1 st Period U.S.! The number by your name is the number of your desk. 0. Anthony Salas Daniel Petti Yimei Xuzhou Michelle Youlton Lara Hamoud Matt Ruben Katy Janson Tiffany Huang Amanda Nelson Jimmy Manke Makayla Garcia Jamin Deaver Jennifer Alvarado

tejano
Télécharger la présentation

New Seats 1 st Period U.S.! The number by your name is the number of your desk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Seats 1st Period U.S.!The number by your name is the number of your desk 0. Anthony Salas • Daniel Petti • YimeiXuzhou • Michelle Youlton • Lara Hamoud • Matt Ruben • Katy Janson • Tiffany Huang • Amanda Nelson • Jimmy Manke • Makayla Garcia • JaminDeaver • Jennifer Alvarado • Bella Wenneberg • Rushil Shah • Hannah Robinson • BayleeBeardslee 17. Hanna Yoshida 18. Michael Torreano 19. Angel Henriquez 20. Ally Wheeler 21. Allen Baek 22. Will Smith 23. Emily Furuichi 24. Alex Malo 25. Tessa Talebi 26. Hannah Athey 27. Alex Penfold 28. HibaAbsar 29. Edi Abrego 30. Rocio Robles 31. JamailaPadaong 32. KshitizGiri 35. Alejandro Guerrero

  2. New Seats 2nd Period U.S.!The number by your name is the number of your desk • <Blank> • Aria Rahimi • Jose Morales • Jeremiah Versoza • Nick Sevely • Jorge Hernandez • Joselyn Rodriguez • Carly McDonald • Sasha Hugly • Jennifer Geranen • Michelle Tabaska • Jonathan Martinez • Wendy Chang • Jeanette Freiberg 15. Suleyma Guerra 16. Carolina Salas 17. Andres Pilling 18. OswaldoCartagema 19. Erik Cortinas 20. Ricardo Duran-Roque 21. KimikoAldritch 22. Erin Heckman 23. Melissa Vargas 24. Jeffrey Martinez 25. Lucas Hugyik 26. Tara Mazda 27. Jennifer Palacios 28. Marisa Gong 30. Sarah Uribe 31. BreannaGambini

  3. New Seats 3rd Period U.S.!The number by your name is the number of your desk • Elizabeth Yuskel • Hansol Kim • Dylan Fluckiger • KaylanCholewa • Kelly Vroom • Andrew Gonzalez • Lizeth Cuevas • Jackie Olivares • Cindy Ho • Brandon Lin • Joey Aronson • Janet Luna • Elenda Estrada • Alyssa Pyrzywara • Marie Critchfield 16. Jonathan Alesandro 17. Punu Sherpa 18. Kyla Hayes 19. Lucas Tong 20. Anne Dong 21. Casey Chien 22. Roshan Das 23. CamilaRaygada 24. Kevin Steiner 25. Evan Johansson 26. Angelica Garcia 27. Andy Du 28. Charlotte Balas 29. Megan Gruspe 30. Juan Miranda 31. Molly Dempsey 32. Ryan Forrest

  4. Good Morning!!! • NVC • Research Paper Check-In/Citations • The Orphan Train • Review Tests Essential Question: How did unequal distribution of wealth affect poor families (especially children) in the mid-19th century? Were the decisions and actions made on the behalf of the poor and their exposed children beneficial or not? Homework: Finish Orphan Train Documents, Research Paper OUTLINE DUE THIS FRIDAY!

  5. Works Cited • Lot’s of examples online for help with MLA Format • www.citationmachine.net • Last, First Name. Book Title. Publisher Name and Location, year.

  6. Orphan Trains • Child poverty a major issue during Gilded Age • Children worked to support families • Millions of children orphaned in major cities • “Foundlings”: orphaned children “found” by charity organizations • Orphan Trains • During 1854-1929 150,000 to 200,000 foundling children were shipped out west on trains to new homes in farm communities

  7. Orphan Train Inquiry • How did unequal distribution of wealth affect poor families (especially children) in the mid-19th century? • Were the decisions and actions made on the behalf of the poor and their exposed children beneficial or not?

  8. End Result… Development of Foster Care System • The Foster care systems of both the United States and Great Britain developed in the 1853. The US system focused on local child placement within the state, rather than beyond state borders.

  9. Review MC Tests • With your partner, compare results to determine why you missed the questions that you missed. • Look for patterns in your performance. Do you: • study dates too much? too little? • are there areas of the content that you did not review enough or that you find more challenging to master? • do you have a difficult time with negative construction stems? • do you talk yourself out of the best answer?

More Related