1 / 14

TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT

TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT. Alexander S. Samotokhin, Andrey G. Tuchin M.V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Sergey A. Sukhanov, Zakhary N. Khutorovsky, Andrey V. Rykin

tekla
Télécharger la présentation

TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Alexander S. Samotokhin, Andrey G. Tuchin M.V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Sergey A. Sukhanov, Zakhary N. Khutorovsky, Andrey V. Rykin Interstate Joint-Stock Corporation “Vympel”, Moscow, Russia

  2. On-Earth control structure of Phobos-Grunt mission

  3. The schedule of LEO operations

  4. The trace of Phobos-Grunt in low Earth orbits

  5. Relative movement of PG and 37947 (SGP4 model)

  6. Relative movement of PG and 37947 (SGP4 model, compensation of time error is applied)

  7. The evolution of A/m ratio (Nov 9 – Dec 10)

  8. Analyzed orbital parameters The draconic period (the time that elapses between two passages of the object through its ascending node) The height of perigee The latitude of under-satellite point in perigee Considered parameters are not osculated elements. Theseparameters were calculated during one revolution with use of the corresponding propagator. The designations used in subsequent figures The propagated evolution Actual Russian SSS data Actual American SSS public data (TLE)

  9. Evolution of the orbit parameters Nov 9-22passive movement, A/m=0.0016 m2/kg (nominal)

  10. Evolution of the orbit parameters Nov 9-Dec 6passive movement, A/m=0.0016 m2/kg (nominal)

  11. Evolution of the orbit parameters Nov 9-22passive movement, A/m=0.00093 m2/kg (58% nominal)

  12. Evolution of the orbit parameters Nov 9-22nominal A/m, acceleration along velocity: 2.83∙10-6m/sec2

  13. Evolution of the orbit parameters Nov 9-22accelerations: along velocity: 2.49∙10-6m/sec2, s/c-Sun direction 1.16∙10-5m/sec2

  14. Conclusions • Really space surveillance systems were the only source of information about behavior of Phobos-Grunt onboard systems in low Earth orbit. It is a very unusual situation. • The data both Russian and American SSS proves that the movement of Phobos-Grunt were not passive during the first 12-13 days after the launch. These data allowed to obtain a estimation of actual perturbations. • The interaction between on-Earth control structure of the mission and Space surveillance system was unsatisfactory. It is necessary to provide real time data exchange between these systems in the future.

More Related