1 / 28

Using HBSC Data in Constructing a Well-Being Indicator

Benelux Seminar « Indicators of Child and Youth Well-Being: The Link between Knowledge, Policy and Practice ». Using HBSC Data in Constructing a Well-Being Indicator. Charles BERG. Outline. Introductory Remarks Alternatives and complements to quantitative indicator construction Practice

tekla
Télécharger la présentation

Using HBSC Data in Constructing a Well-Being Indicator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benelux Seminar « Indicators of Child and Youth Well-Being: The Link between Knowledge, Policy and Practice » Using HBSC Data in Constructing a Well-Being Indicator Charles BERG

  2. Outline • Introductory Remarks • Alternatives and complements to quantitative indicator construction • Practice • Concluding Remark charles.berg@uni.lu

  3. Introductory Remarks • The current multiple political framing of policy relevant youth research • Health/well-being as a complex category • Data and data sources used in the presentation • Objectives of presentation charles.berg@uni.lu

  4. The current multiple political framing of policy relevant youth research • International Reporting (UNICEF, OECD) • Little power, strong influence • The OMC (European Union) • Acquiring a greater understanding and knowledge of young people and their concerns is one of the priorities of youth policies at EU level • Memorandum van overeenstemming (BENELUX) • « hiertoe wordt nauw samengewerkt […] met jeugdkenntniscentra » • Luxembourg Youth Act 2008 (National, local) • A knowledge based youth policy development: Observatoire des jeunes, Rapport jeunesse, Plans communaux charles.berg@uni.lu

  5. Data and Data Sources DJAB Project (Ministery of Health, Ministerry of Education, Ministery of Family), Survey Data (Questionnaire, 536 Variables) • Data-Set 0:HBSC (Health Behaviour in Schoolaged Children) in Luxembourg Schools; n=7398 (1999) • Data-Set 1:Diekirch, military recruits and soldiers; n=311(2003-2004) • Data-Set 2:Esch, unemployed young people (in vocational training course); n=130 (2003-2004) • Data-Set 3:Dreiborn, young people in enforced residential care; n=24 (2003-2004) • Data-Set 4:Manternach, drug addicts in therapy; n=22 (2003-2004) charles.berg@uni.lu

  6. Cf. e.g.: Blaxter, Mildred (2004). Health. Cambridge: Polity. Health/Wellbeing as a Complex Categorie • Defining Health • Measuring Health • Constructing Health • Experiencing Health • Enacting Health • Relating Health to Social Structure charles.berg@uni.lu

  7. Objective of Presentation • Illustrate the work with indicators and its political relevance • Contextualise indicator construction in the more general approach of policy relevant data analysis • Show potentials and limits of indicators charles.berg@uni.lu

  8. Alternatives and complements to quantitative indicator construction • Networking • Theory-driven semantic structuring charles.berg@uni.lu

  9. Networking • Interviewing experts • Organizing focus groups and workshops • Analyzing documents • Gathering discourse data • Translating and merging discourses • Relating discourses to contexts • Gaining experts as critical friends • Giving young people a voice • Reconstructing everyday rationales • Grounded Theory Methodology charles.berg@uni.lu

  10. Theory-driven semantic structuring as a preprocess of quantitative indicator construction • Luxembourg Youth Report Method: • Chapter • Thematic Domains • Dimensions • Indicators charles.berg@uni.lu

  11. Data Oriented Theory Oriented Physical, Mental, & Social Well-Being • Contexts of Well-Being • Health Promoting and Health Harming Behaviour • Health Outcomes • Risk Behaviour Compare to UNICEF or OECD Structure charles.berg@uni.lu

  12. Available Data Sources Sensible Indicators Contexts of Well-Being • Family Background • Family structure and Dwelling • Socioeconomic Condition • Quality of Relationships • Parental Pressure to Perform • Peers • Frequency of Social Contacts • Support Resources • Support through Class Mates • Leisure • School • Perception of School • School Skipping • Work • Satisfaction with work situation • Absences from Work • General personal Optimism etc charles.berg@uni.lu

  13. Practice • Approaches to indicator construction • The Well-Being Indicator • Examples of a few Analytic Inquiries charles.berg@uni.lu

  14. Approaches to indicator construction:Different Rationales • Semantically/theoretically plausible links between variables • Boolean intersection • Distributional criterion • Classification of variables • Classification of cases • Dimension Reduction • Moving Beyond the Observed charles.berg@uni.lu

  15. Approaches to indicator construction:Statistical Toolkit • Multidimensional contingency table • Correlation matrix • Cluster Analysis (variables) • Unifactorial relationship between a set of more variables (Principal Component Analysis) • Reliability: Cronbach’s Alpha • Cluster Analysis (Cases) • Factor Analysis • Latent Class Analysis charles.berg@uni.lu

  16. The Constructionof a Well-Being Indicator 6 dimensions ; 18 variables charles.berg@uni.lu

  17. Frequencies of Well Being Indicator charles.berg@uni.lu

  18. Analysis 1: The Gender Divide in Well-Being CHI2 = .707 Sig.= .000 PHI = .36 Comparing Frequency Distributions in Quartiles charles.berg@uni.lu

  19. Analysis 2: The Gender Divide in Well-Being F = 798.56 Sig = .000 ETA = .35 ETA2 = .12 Comparing Group Means of Wellbeing Indicator charles.berg@uni.lu

  20. Analysis 3:Gender – Wellbeing Relation by Subfiles charles.berg@uni.lu

  21. Analysis 4: Family and Wellbeing • FAS: Family Affluence Scale • Family Structure • Relationship with Parents • Endo- and Exogenic Network • Family Climate • Structure • Agency • Culture charles.berg@uni.lu

  22. Analysis 5: Wellbeing by FAS charles.berg@uni.lu

  23. Analysis 6:Wellbeing and Family Structure charles.berg@uni.lu

  24. Analysis 7: Well-Being by Parent Relationships charles.berg@uni.lu

  25. Analysis 8: Well-Being by Trust Networks charles.berg@uni.lu

  26. More Topics/similar tendency • Mediation by Knowledge: The Instance of AIDS Prevention • Peer Group Cultures • Nationality, Language, Multilingualisme • Leisure Cultures • Sexual Behaviour • School • Drugs • Nutrition • Risk Behaviour • etc charles.berg@uni.lu

  27. Concluding Remark • Relevance of indicators both in policy relevant and comparative research • Contextualise indicators The indicator construction should be open to a policy making process as well to a process of understanding • Embed indicator reading and interpreting in a conversational process • See indicators as elements in a process of sense making charles.berg@uni.lu

  28. Thank you for your attention. charles.berg @uni.lu charles.berg@uni.lu

More Related