SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Weighing in on the Graduation Rate Debate

teleri avatar
7 diapositives · 199 Views · Aug 21, 2014

This study investigates the disparities in graduation rates between college football players and the general student population across various U.S. universities. Key hypotheses include the correlation between a school's academic rank and the graduation rate gap (FGR), the impact of part-time student percentages on the FGR gap, and the influence of football team performance on graduation outcomes. Findings are based on a correlation matrix and regression analysis involving data from 116 Football Bowl Subdivision schools, revealing statistically significant relationships among academic rank, race, and athletic performance.

Weighing in on the Graduation Rate Debate - slide 1
01 / 7Weighing in on the Graduation Rate Debate
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Weighing in on the Graduation Rate Debate
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Weighing in on the Graduation Rate Debate Allen L Sack University of New Haven Robert Holub University of New Haven

  2. Hypotheses • H The higher the academic rank of a school, the greater the FGR gap between players and other students, e.g., USC, Rice, UCLA, Virginia. • H The larger the percentage of part-time students in the general student body, the smaller the FGR gap, e.g., Boise State. • H The better the football team’s performance on the field, the higher the FGR gap, e.g., Florida as opposed to Duke, Stanford, or Notre Dame. 1 2 3

  3. Table 1: Correlation Matrix of Select Variables Related to FGRGap: Football Bowl Subdivision Schools (n =116) * Significant at the .05 level; ** Significant at the .01 level

  4. Table 2: Mean FGRGap by Academic Rank and Size of Part Time Student Population (Two-Way AOV) Academic Rank • Main Effects of Academic Rank and Part Time Sig. at .004 • Interactions not statistically significant.

  5. Table 3: Mean FGRGap by Academic Rank and Sagarin Rating (Two-Way AOV) Academic Rank • Main Effects of Academic Rank and Sagarin Rating Sig at .001 • Interactions not statistically significant.

  6. Table 4: Regression Coefficients (Dependent Variable: GAP) • R2= .371; F = 22.035; n = 116

  7. Table 5: Mean FGR by Race and Academic Rank (Two-Way AOV) Academic Rank • Main Effects of Academic Rank and Race Sig. at .01 • Interactions not statically significant.