1 / 60

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS (DOD&MV)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS (DOD&MV) (DEFENCE SECRETARIAT [DEF SEC] AND SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCE [SANDF]) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLANS 2013. 1. SCOPE. Aim Introduction Part 1: Strategic Overview DOD Vision and Mission Constitutional and Legislative Mandates

terri
Télécharger la présentation

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS (DOD&MV)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS (DOD&MV) (DEFENCE SECRETARIAT [DEF SEC] AND SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCE [SANDF]) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLANS 2013 1

  2. SCOPE • Aim • Introduction • Part 1: Strategic Overview • DOD Vision and Mission • Constitutional and Legislative Mandates • DOD Macro Organisational Structure (2008) • MOD&MV Strategic Priorities: FY2013/14 • MOD&MV Strategic Focus Areas: FY2013/14 • Part 2: Financial Allocations of the Defence Programme: FY2013/14 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) Budget Summary • Financial Allocation of the Defence Programme 2

  3. SCOPE (CONT.) • Part 3: DOD Core Performance Information • DOD Annual Selected Performance Indicators (Estimate of National Expenditure [ENE] and Targets for the FY2013/14) • DOD Performance Information • EA OASS link with Planning Instruments • Public Entities reporting to the Executive Authority • Organs of State reporting to the Executive Authority 3

  4. Part 4: DOD FY2013/14 MTEF Budget Plan • Financial performance as at 31 March 2013 • Baseline reductions • Requirements to MTEC • Budget cut as per November 2012 allocation letter • Further budget cut as per February 2013 allocation letter • MTEF allocations: 2013/14-2015/16 • Budget reduction implications • Vote 22: Allocation per main programme: FY2013/14 • Vote 22: Allocation per economic classification: FY2013/14 • Concluding remarks SCOPE (CONT.) 4

  5. AIM To present to the core corporate overview of the Def Sec and SANDF APPs for 2013 to the Portfolio Committee of Defence and Military Veterans. 5

  6. INTRODUCTION • Planning instruments aligned to outcomes based principles of government (Change [Core Performance Information] and Sustained Agenda). • Aligned with National Treasury Framework for SP and APP. • DOD APPs aligned to FY2011/12 – 2015/16 Strategic Plans. • DOD First Draft APP submitted to NT/Presidency (DPM&E) during August 2012. • DOD Second Draft APP submitted to NT/Presidency (DPM&E) during November 2012. • DOD APPs tabled in Parliament on 13 March 2013 (60 Copies and 1x electronic CD). 6

  7. PART 1: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

  8. DOD VISION “Effective defence for a democratic South Africa”. DOD MISSION “To provide, manage, prepare and employ defence capabilities commensurate with the needs of South Africa as regulated by the Constitution, national legislation and Parliamentary and Executive direction. The above will be provided through the proper management, provision, preparedness and employment of defence capabilities, which are in line with the domestic and global needs of South Africa”. 8

  9. LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE APPs • Public Service Regulations: • Part III 3B. indicates the requirements for the Executing Authority to prepare a Strategic Plan. • National Treasury Regulations: • Chapter 5, (5.1 and 5.2) indicates the requirements for the Accounting Officer to prepare plans. • National Treasury Framework for SP and APP: • Departments are required to produce and table an APP including forward projections for a further two years, consistent with the medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF) period, with annual and quarterly performance targets, where appropriate, for the current financial year and the MTEF. • National Treasury Framework for Programme Performance Information. 9

  10. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE MANDATES 10

  11. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE MANDATES (CONT.) 11

  12. DOD MACRO ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE (2008) 12

  13. Overarching Executive Authority’s Policy Statement 0 Sec Def Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan SANDF Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan 1 Services/Divisions (APP) 2

  14. MOD&MV PRIORITIES: FY2013/14 • Priority 1: Enhancement of the South African National Defence Force’s (SANDF’s) Landward Defence Capabilities. The Landward Defence Capability has not enjoyed the advantage of being part of the Strategic Defence Packages (SDP) and is to be modernised taking into consideration the financial expenditure ability of the SA Army and the overall DOD and ARMSCOR procurement systems and processes capabilities which support such expenditure. • Priority 2: Maritime Security. The South African Maritime Strategy has been developed and is currently in the process of being integrated within the broader Southern African Development Community (SADC) Maritime Security Strategies. The SANDF will continue to execute counter-piracy operations in support of the Mozambican Defence Force (MDF) in the Mozambique Channel amidst the on-going sourcing of appropriate funding levels for such operations. 14

  15. MOD&MV PRIORITIES: FY2013/14 (CONT.) Priority 3: Force Rejuvenation (Job Creation). The DOD will endeavour to create job opportunities within the defence industry in accordance with approved DOD projects. Priority 4: Enhancement of the SANDF’s Peacekeeping Capability (SANDF Deployability). The role of the SANDF in promoting peace and security in the region and on the African continent under the auspices of the United Nations (UN), African Union (AU) and hybrid Peace-Support Operations (PSOs), necessitates the enhancement of the SANDF’s peacekeeping capability that will include the SANDF’s Forward Deployment Capability. 15

  16. MOD&MV PRIORITIES: FY2013/14(CONT.) Priority 5: National Youth Service (NYS). The execution of the NYS programme will continue during the FY2013/14 MTEF. For the year ahead it is envisaged that the NYS policy framework once considered, will lead to the implementation of the NYS policy framework. Priority 6: Revitalisation of the Reserves. The Reserves will continue to be transformed and revitalised to fulfill their primary role of providing a large component of the conventional landward capability of the SANDF whilst at the same time supplementing peace support missions conducted by the Regulars. 16

  17. MOD&MV PRIORITIES: FY2013/14 (CONT.) Priority 7: Restructuring and Support of the Defence Industry. The restructuring of the Defence Industry will focus on current and future defence capability requirements in support of the Defence mandate. The work of the Defence Industry Council will require strengthening. Priority 8: Department of Defence Works Capability. The DOD has steadily progressed with the establishment of the Defence Works Formation which is currently functional and executing identified renovation projects for facilities occupied by the DOD in close co-operation with the National Department of Public Works (NDPW). A plan, in conjunction with the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), has been developed to establish a Joint Interim Operations Centre (JIOC) to manage the migration of functions and responsibilities wit respect to facilities management and maintenance from the NDPW to the DOD during a period agreed upon by both Departments. 17

  18. MOD&MV STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS • Military Skills Development System (MSDS). The MSDS shall continue to be a means for force rejuvenation as a component of the Human Resources (HR) Renewal Strategy and is not regarded as a broad initiative for job creation. • The Defence Review. Given that the Defence Review is reaching its final stage, planning for the short and medium term are to be undertaken in keeping with considerations for the possible future implications for defence as contained within the current draft Defence Review. • Transformation within the SANDF. The representation of both men and women in command structures of the SANDF shall remain a key focus area for the FY2013/14.

  19. MOD&MV STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS (CONT.) • DOD Grievance Procedure. The DOD grievance procedure must be fully functional and effective in protecting members of the department from abuse and illegality. • Reconfiguration of Force Number Allocation.To ensure that force numbers do not necessarily demonstrate the members’ time of joining in the DOD, the department will revisit the structuring of force number allocation. • Maintenance and Enforcement of Discipline. All Chiefs of Services, Devisions and Unit Commanders are responsible for discipline in the DOD. There should be a zero tolerance on all forms and maifestation of ill-discipline, including the abuse of power by commanders. Furthermore , the DOD legal system will be strengthened to attend to ill-discipline in the SANDF.

  20. MOD&MV STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS (CONT.) • DOD Audit Findings. The DOD’s focus in the previous financial years has been on the introduction of specific interventions to strengthen internal DOD controls in order to eliminate current and possible future audit qualifications. For 2012 particular emphasis was placed on addressing the single remaining asset management qualification, as well as other matters of importance and the general enhancement of financial management and internal controls. Operation Clean Audit, an internal departmental co-ordinating mechanism, has served as such a mechanism to strengthen the DOD internal controls in the various resource areas of the department. For the FY2013/14 human resources, information technology, procurement and accounting shall be strengthened in order to avoid possible audit reports.

  21. MOD&MV STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS (CONT.) • DOD Planning Instruments. Departmental planning will continue to be aligned with government’s outcomes oriented strategic planning, budgeting, risk management and monitoring and evaluation processes. • Corruption and Fraud. The DOD continues to adopt a zero-tolerance attitude to all forms of corruption and fraud within the department and internal infrastructures to combat fraud is in the process of being fully capacitated.

  22. PART 2: FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS OF THE DEFENCE PROGRAMME: FY2013/14 MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK (MTEF) BUDGET SUMMARY

  23. FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS OF THE DEFENCE PROGRAMME 23

  24. PART 3: DOD CORE PERFORMANCE INFORMATION 24

  25. DOD ESTIMATES OF NATIONAL EXPENDITURE (ENE) FY2014/15 MTEF 25

  26. DOD ESTIMATES OF NATIONAL EXPENDITURE (ENE) FY2014/15 MTEF • The following high level criteria informs (amongst others) the identification of the DOD ENE on an annual basis: • Level 0/1 Core Indicator. • Linked to the legislative / policy (sustained) mandate. • Linked to Output Deliverables. • Linked to major funding initiatives. • Have trendable information. • Linked to the MTSF Outcomes. • Linked to National Development Plan (NDP). 26

  27. DOD ANNUAL SELECTED PERFORMANCE (ENE) INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR THE FY2013/14

  28. DOD ANNUAL SELECTED PERFORMANCE (ENE) INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR THE FY2013/14(CONT.)

  29. DOD ANNUAL SELECTED PERFORMANCE (ENE) INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR THE FY2013/14 (CONT.)

  30. PUBLIC ENTITIES REPORTING TO THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY 30

  31. ORGANS OF STATE REPORTING TO THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY 31

  32. DOD PERFORMANCE INFORMATION • DOD Performance Information continues to mature over the short and medium term. The approval during March 2013 of the first DOD Performance Information Plan (PI Plan) “Road Map” for the FY2013/14 to FY2015/16, as prescribed by the NT Performance Information Handbook 2007, highlights in detail the focus areas that will enable structured refinement of DOD Performance Information during the current MTSF period and beyond. These areas include amongst others the following: • Integrated Strategic Management Enabler. Detailed performance reports based on the actual DOD Performance Information to ensure auditability and uniformity of reporting and base-line determination (target setting) through an electronic/automated DOD Integrated Strategic Management Enabler (ISME). • Performance Information (PI) Design. The development of core DOD (mandate based) PIs and associated technical data sheets. Performance Indicators are design to improve their relevance, well-defined, verifiability, cost-effectiveness, appropriateness and reliability. 32

  33. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) • The DOD PI Plan (a three year strategy) will furthermore facilitate the following: • The identification of PIs used to measure DOD programme performance (PI Framework), linked to budget allocation/expenditure. • The source data used to construct the indicators. • The storage and accessibility of PI data. • The use of PI in DOD decision making. • Criteria for PI selection. • A comprehensive DOD PI Implementation Plan will be implemented during the FY2013/14 MTEF to ensure the realisation of the PI Plan (strategy) to improve current PI identification, development, implementation and reporting in support of the Defence mandate. • The development of the first automated DOD Integrated Strategic Management Enabler (ISME) will ensure the integration of the planning, budgeting, reporting and risk management functions within Defence. 33

  34. DOD LOGICAL MODEL (OUTCOMES BASED PLANNING APPROACH) Effectiveness Equity Performance Measures Efficiency Economy 34

  35. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

  36. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.)

  37. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 37

  38. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 38

  39. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 39

  40. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 40

  41. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 41

  42. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 42

  43. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 43

  44. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (CONT.) 44

  45. Detailed information per DOD Programmes in support of the corporate DOD FY2013/14 MTEF Overarching Strategic Direction as presented above, is contained in the subordinate Def Sec and SANDF FY2013/14 MTEF Planning Instruments as tabled in Parliament on 13 March 2013. EA OASS LINK WITH PLANNING INSTRUMENTS

  46. PART 4: DOD FY2013/14 MTEF BUDGET PLAN

  47. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AS AT 31 MARCH 2013 • Comments: • Provisional Financial Performance Results. 99.51% expended in full compliance with 98% undertaking. • Administration. Under expenditure mainly within the Department of Military Veterans (RM4,943) and the transfer payment to SASSETA (RM1,192) being less than anticipated. • Force Employment. Under expenditure of RM17,347 on additional funds in the Peace Support Operations environment. • General Support. RM153 for the Denel (AMG) contract termination retrenchment cost (Roll-over claim). PCD brief 8 May 13 Vote 22.pptx 47

  48. BASELINE REDUCTIONS PCD brief 8 May 13 Vote 22.pptx 48

  49. REQUIREMENTS TO MTEC PCD brief 8 May 13 Vote 22.pptx 49

  50. BUDGET CUT AS PER NOVEMBER 2012 ALLOCATION LETTER PCD brief 8 May 13 Vote 22.pptx 50

More Related