1 / 6

2011-12 PBS Secretariat National Transport Commission

by Sri Kannan. 2011-12 PBS Secretariat National Transport Commission. 2012 Stats. 122 new applications, up 58% from 2011 (77). 118 approved at 96.7% efficiency Over 450 vehicle combinations (411 PBS Final Approvals), up from 216 in 2011.

tess
Télécharger la présentation

2011-12 PBS Secretariat National Transport Commission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. by Sri Kannan 2011-12 PBS SecretariatNational Transport Commission

  2. 2012 Stats • 122 new applications, up 58% from 2011 (77). • 118 approved at 96.7% efficiency • Over 450 vehicle combinations (411 PBS Final Approvals), up from 216 in 2011. • Of the total 1150 vehicles approved by PBS since 2007, 450 or 41% were approved in 2012. • In the last 6 months of 2012 over 280 vehicle combinations were approved. More than 2.5 safer and efficient PBS vehicles hit Australian roads every business day. • Received applications for and approved 7 new PBS Certifiers. • In Dec 2012, 54 vehicle combinations were approved

  3. Application quality, common mistakes, etc. • Generally good quality • Technical summary • Brief intro to the design • Assumptions • Worst case scenario – including partial loading • Safety factor used • Anything the PRP needs to know – innovations, critical elements, too close to a minimum requirement, sensitivity studies • If a vehicle is too close to a performance requirement, critical elements to consider for the vehicle to remain compliant, impact on the performance and on-road if a vehicle fails to comply. • When payload heights are less than bin heights – in case of a breach, impact of vehicle’s performance against standards and also on road impact

  4. Application quality, common mistakes, etc. • Drawings • Include vehicle’s CoG details in the drawings • Maximum axle group masses that can be permitted – cap GCM of GVM • Currency of assessor’s data with some support from applicants • Adherence to admin tasks requested by PRP • Applications should support innovation and bring the industry forward • Level 2b applications do not have access to Level 3 network unless they pass bridge formula. Assessors to note.

  5. Difficulties encountered with design variations • Amendments too close to each other or immediately after an application approval. • Set number of amendments for an application – 3. Why? Preservation of design • Can we be flexible with amendments? To what extent. • When to use amendment and when to use a variation?

  6. Ways to ‘lubricate’ a PBS application to get it through the system more smoothly • Upfront discussions with jurisdictions and LCs • Industries to understand how PBS works and how long it takes to obtain access permits from jurisdictions – consider this when planning production. • Resolution of access – covered as part of R2 of NHVL; jurisdictions to declare access networks to PBS vehicles; vehicles can operate under notices. Jurisdictions to be open minded when considering expanding the network • Jurisdictions to be more open minded when reviewing innovations – approving innovative axle groups or trialling access to 2.6m wide vehicles

More Related