1 / 46

Christa Meyenberger Michael Sulz

Interdisziplinäre Viszeralmedizin Zystische Pankreasläsionen. Endoscopic treatment of Pancreatic Necrosis and Pseudocysts. Christa Meyenberger Michael Sulz. Agenda. A cute pancreatitis Definitions of fluid collections When to intervene in necrotising pancreatitis

thad
Télécharger la présentation

Christa Meyenberger Michael Sulz

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interdisziplinäre Viszeralmedizin Zystische Pankreasläsionen Endoscopictreatmentof PancreaticNecrosis and Pseudocysts Christa Meyenberger Michael Sulz

  2. Agenda • Acutepancreatitis • Definitionsof fluid collections • Whentointervene in necrotisingpancreatitis • Methodsforinterventions in WOPN • Endoscopictechniquesofdrainage/necrosectomy • Risksandcomplications in EUS-guideddrainage • Howlongstenting? • Endoscopicnecrosectomy: • Outcome data in literatureandourownexperience • Pseudocysts • Key messages

  3. AcutePancreatitis (AP) • 85% Interstitial AP • Mortality 3% • Organ failure 10% • Recoverywithin 5-7 d • 15% Necrotising AP • Mortality 15% • Organ failure 54% • Organ failure 66% withinfectednecrosis (mortality 30%) Banks PA et al. Am J Gastroenterol2006;101:2379; TsiotosGG et al. BrJ Surg 1998;85:1650; FagenholzPJ et al. Ann Epidemiol2007;17:491; Martinez J et al. Pancreatology2006;6:206; Chauhan S et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:443.

  4. Pancreatic fluid collections Accordingtotherevised Atlanta classification • Key points • Acute fluid collections: • Lack a well-defined wall • > 1 weekdistinction • betweenAPFC vs. ANC • Usually NO treatment Banks PA et al. Gut 2013;62:102-111.

  5. Acutenecroticcollection (ANC) Stars: necrosis; arrows: bordersofthe ANC Banks PA et al. Gut 2012;62:102-111.

  6. Acutenecroticcollection (ANC) InfectedANC Arrow heads: gas bubbles; arrows: bordersofthe ANC Banks PA et al. Gut 2012;62:102-111.

  7. Pancreatic fluid collections Accordingtotherevised Atlanta classification Banks PA et al. Gut 2013;62:102-111.

  8. Pancreatic fluid collections Accordingtotherevised Atlanta classification Banks PA et al. Gut 2013;62:102-111.

  9. Natural historyofpancreaticnecrosis is variable • May remain solid orliquefy • May remain sterile orbecomeinfected • May persistordisappearover time Banks PA et al. Gut 2013;62:102-111.

  10. Whenisinterventionindicatedfornecrosis? It’ s all abouttiming...! WAIT at least 3-4 weeks Besselink MG et al. ArchSur 2007;142:1194-1201.

  11. Whenisinterventionindicatedfornecrosis? Infectednecrosis (WOPN) • High suspicionfororknowninfected WOPN • Early interventionshouldbeavoidedwheneverpossible • (wait >4weeks) Symptomatic sterile necrosis (WOPN) • Intractablepain • Obstructivesymptoms (gastricoutlet/ biliaryobstruction) • Inabilitytoeat Freeman ML et al. Pancreas 2012;41:1176-1194; Baron TH et al. ClinGastroenterolHepatol 2012;10:1202-1207.

  12. Availablemethodsforintervention in pancreaticnecrosis Endoscopic Image-guidedpercutaneous Minimally-invasive surgery Open surgicalnecrosectomy Freeman ML et al. Pancreas 2012;41:1176-1194.

  13. Availablemethodsforintervention in pancreaticnecrosis Endoscopic Image-guidedpercutaneous Minimally-invasive surgery Open surgicalnecrosectomy Last choice! Freeman ML et al. Pancreas 2012;41:1176-1194.

  14. Whyendoscopictreatment of WOPN? • First randomizedtrial (PENGUIN trial) comparing • endoscopicandsurgicalpancreaticnecrosectomy • Significantreductionofproinflammatoryresponse (IL-6) • Significantreductionofmajorcomplications • (20% vs. 80%; P=0.03) • Reductionofpancreaticfistula (10% vs.70%; P=0.02) Endoscopicnecrosectomyhasthe potential for a quantumleaptoimproveoutcome in WOPN Bakker OJ et al. JAMA 2012,307:1053-1061.

  15. Endoscopictechniquesofdrainage/necrosectomy • Peroral flexible endoscopicdrainage • transpapillarytransmural • Directendoscopicnecrosectomy • Nasocysticcatheter Freeman ML et al. Pancreas 2012;41:1176-1194.

  16. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections Whatyouneed Conscioussedation 2. EUS linear scope, operating channel >3.6mm 3. 19-gauge needle 4. Two 0.035 inch (0.89 mm) guidewires(superstiff) 5. Cystotome10 Fr Two double pigtailstents (7 F, 5 or 7 cm) Nasocysticcatheter(6 F) Barthet M Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32:128-33; Barthet GIE 2008;67:245-52; Seewald S Endoscopy 2009;41:166-174.

  17. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections Visualisation • Significantlyhighertechnicalsuccessthanwithout EUS • (100 vs. 33%, P<0.001)1 Exclude interposedvessels using Doppler ultrasound 1 Vadararajulu S et al. GIE 2008;68:1102-1111. Park DH, Endoscopy 2009 (PRC; n= 60)

  18. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections Puncture & guidewireinsertion 2 loops

  19. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections Ballon dilatation & secondguidewire

  20. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections Insertion ofpigtail & nasocysticcatheter 7 F nasocysticcatheter 10 F double pigtail Irrigation with 1500 ml saline/24h via nasocysticcatheter

  21. Endoscopic necrosectomy ( Dilateupto 18-20 mm Insert a therapeuticgastroscope, generouslavage, Remove debris • Instruments: • Dormiabasket • Retrievalnets • Soft snares Nasocysticcatheter

  22. EUS-guided drainage: Be aware of… Perforation Distanceto GI-wall

  23. Risks of EUS-guided drainage: Perforation • Relative risk : 0.9 to 3 % • Related to the distance between the digestive wall / cyst lumen: • usually< 1 cm • in fact possible up to 2 cm Use CO2 insufflator Barthet M et al. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32:128-33; Barthet M et al. GIE 2008;67:245-52; SeewaldS et al. Dig Endosc2009;21:S61-5; Giovannini et al. GI Clin N Am 2012;22:221-30.

  24. EUS-guided drainage: Be aware of… Perforation Distanceto GI-wall Interposedvessels Bleeding

  25. Risks of EUS-guided drainage: Bleeding • Rate: 1 - 6 % • Immediate: • Due toportalhypertension • Due tointerposedvessels • Delayed: • Dueto erosion of vessels inside the PC wall (pseudoaneurysma) • Management by interventional coiling orEUS-guidedembolization Use EUS and/or CECT Barthet M et al. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32:128-33; Barthet M et al. GIE 2008;67:245-52; SeewaldS et al. Dig Endosc2009;21:S61-5; Giovannini et al. GI Clin N Am 2012;22:221-30.

  26. EUS-guided drainage: Be aware of… Perforation Distanceto GI-wall InInterposedvessels Bleeding Infection Presence ofdebris, Diameter ofcollection

  27. EUS-guided drainage: Be aware of… Perforation Distanceto GI-wall InInterposedvessels Bleeding Infection Presence ofdebris, Diameter ofcollection Migration/ Recurrence Typesofstents (Pigtail/Metal)

  28. Risks of EUS-guided drainage: Stent migration • Rate: <1 % • Immediate migration: • Technical problems with release • Double pigtail (marker!) • Metal stent (inside release) • Delayed migration: metal stent Barthet M et al. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32:128-33; Barthet M et al. GIE 2008;67:245-52; SeewaldS et al. Dig Endosc2009;21:S61-5; Giovannini et al. GI Clin N Am 2012;22:221-30.

  29. Risks of EUS-guided drainage: Recurrence • Rate: 5-10 % • Early stent removal = Risk of recurrence • MRI assessment of the main pancreatic duct • Duct leakage: transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting to maintain integrity • Disconnected duct syndrome: Leave pigtails indefinitely in place • Role of stent type • At least two double pigtail (7 F sufficient!) • Metal stent ? Barthet M et al. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32:128-33; Barthet M et al. GIE 2008;67:245-52; SeewaldS et al. Dig Endosc2009;21:S61-5; Giovannini et al. GI Clin N Am 2012;22:221-30. Arvanitakis et al. GIE 2007

  30. EUS-guided drainage: Be aware of… Perforation Distanceto GI-wall Interposedvessels Bleeding Infection Presence ofdebris, Diameter ofcollection Migration/ Recurrence Typesofstents (Pigtail/Metal)

  31. Endoscopic necrosectomy: Outcome1 • Systematicreview (pooledanalysis) • 10 studies (260 patients; 60% proventobeculture-positive necrosis) • 1996-2009 • Systematicreview (pooledanalysis): 14 studies(455 patients; 2005-2013) • Onlyoneprospectiverandomizedstudy 1 Haghshenasskashani A et al. SurgEndosc 2011;25:3724-3730.; van Brunschof S et al. SurgEndosc 2014

  32. Endoscopic necrosectomy: Outcome1 Endoscopic necrosectomy is safe and effective in management of WOPN 1 Haghshenasskashani A et al. SurgEndosc 2011;25:3724-3730.; van Brunschof S et al. SurgEndosc 2014

  33. Ourown single-center experienceregarding WOPN treatment (retrospective, 2002-2013, 2 operators) Christa Meyenberger & Michael Sulz; unpublisheddata

  34. Ourown single-center experience Christa Meyenberger & Michael Sulz; unpublisheddata

  35. Ourown single-center experience Christa Meyenberger & Michael Sulz; unpublisheddata

  36. Ourown single-center experience Christa Meyenberger & Michael Sulz; unpublisheddata

  37. Ourown single-center experience Long-term qualityoflife (SF-36 score) Christa Meyenberger & Michael Sulz; unpublisheddata

  38. Pseudocyst: • Indicationfortreatment: • Symptoms: impairedfoodintake, pain • Complications: infection, bleeding • Endoscopictreatment: • EUS-guidedtransmuralendoscopicdrainage • transgastric, -duodenal • - Transpapillarydrainge, stenting • Surgicaltreatment • Cystoenterostomy • Cystogastrostomy • Morbidity 25%, mortality 5% • Percutaneousdrainage • - Complication: fistula Köhler H, Schafmayer A, Lüdtke FE, et al. Surgicaltreatmentofpancreaticpseudocysts. Br J Surg 1987; 74:813. Gumaste VV, Pitchumoni CS. Pancreaticpseudocyst. Gastroenterologist 1996; 4:33.

  39. Pseudocyst – Surgery versus endoscopy Onerandomizedstudy Endoscopictreatment = firstchoiceoftreatment • MRI assessment of the main pancreatic duct • Duct leakage: transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting to maintain integrity • Disconnected duct syndrome: Leave pigtails indefinitely in place or surgery Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. EqualEfficacyofEndoscopicandSurgicalCystogastrostomyforPancreaticPseudocyst Drainage in a RandomizedTrial Gastroenterology. 2013 Sep;145(3):583-90

  40. Key messages • Definethepancreaticfluid collection(Revised Atlanta classification) • Acute fluid collection: Usuallynotreatment • Collections > 4 weeks: Distinctbetweenpseudocyst / WOPN • WOPN with solid material • Intervention in WOPN: Timing! Wait >3-4 weeks • Endoscopicinterventionsin WOPN: effectiveandsafe • Importantissues: • Distanceto GI-wall < 1-2 cm • Use EUS (interposedvessels) • MRI assessmentofmainpancreaticduct • Pseudocysts: • Endoscopictreatmentisfirstchoiceoftreatment • MRI assessmentofmainpancreaticduct

  41. Novel multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of WOPN1 1 Varadarajulu S et al. GIE 2011;74:74-80; Figurefrom: Baron TH et al. ClinGastroenterolHepatol 2012;10:1202-1207.

  42. Who should not perform endotherapy in WOPN? • The time challenged with full endoscopy program • Endoscopistswithout EUS access • Endoscopistswithout expert surgical and interventional • radiologic support to treat complications ... in otherwords... Who should perform endotherapy in WOPN? • Only expert pancreaticobiliaryendoscopists with special committment • Those with clinical judgementregarding the appropriate indication Baron TH et al. ClinGastroenterolHepatol 2012;10:1202-1207; Kozarek RA, GIE 2005;62:101-104.

  43. Entscheidung zur Operation • Kriterien: • Grösse des Abszesses • Pankreasgangruptur mit fehlender • transpapillärer Ableitung • Zystojejunostomie am 10.3.2009 • Postoperativ guter AZ

  44. Therapieempfehlung Pankreasabszess I • Interdisziplinärer Approach • Initial endoskopische Therapie, immer wenn: • Zugang endoskopisch möglich • Interventionalist mit entsprechender Erfahrung verfügbar • Ziele der endoskopischen Therapie: • Stabilisierung der Situation durch Drainage • Verhinderung von Komplikationen einer notfallmässigen Operation Seewald S et al. Aggressive endoscopictherapyforpancreaticnecrosisandpancreatisabscess: a newsafeandeffectivetreatmentalgorithm. Gastro Endosc 2005; 62: 92-100.

  45. Therapieempfehlung Pankreasabszess II • Indikationen zur Chirurgie: • „Endoscopic failure“ • Unzureichende Entfernung von nekrotischem Material aufgrund schlechtem endoskop. Zugang • Zugang unmöglich, z.B. paracolic gutters • „Disconnected-duct syndrome“ (totale Pankreasgangruptur) • Grösse der Kollektion > 15 cm* • Ergebnisse der endoskopischen Therapie • 2/3 Kurativ • 1/3 Klinische Verbesserung mit elektiver OP im Verlauf Seewald S et al. Aggressive endoscopictherapyforpancreaticnecrosisandpancreatisabscess: a newsafeandeffectivetreatmentalgorithm. Gastro Endosc 2005;62: 92-100. * Papachristou GI et al. AnnalsofSurgery 2007;245:950.

More Related