1 / 17

Reducing Diesel Emissions From Road Construction

Reducing Diesel Emissions From Road Construction. Alan Jones, Manager Environmental Policy Office Tennessee Department of Transportation. NOx. 4%. 4%. 33%. 33%. 57%. 57%. 6%. 6%. 37%. 46%. 14%. 3%. Contribution of Non-road Emissions. PM 2.5.

thao
Télécharger la présentation

Reducing Diesel Emissions From Road Construction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reducing Diesel EmissionsFrom Road Construction Alan Jones, Manager Environmental Policy Office Tennessee Department of Transportation

  2. NOx 4% 4% 33% 33% 57% 57% 6% 6% 37% 46% 14% 3% Contribution of Non-road Emissions PM 2.5 On-road mobile sources, e.g., cars, trucks Area sources, including open burning, small businesses, household activities Source: Tennessee 2002 Draft Emissions Inventory Point sources, e.g., factories and utilities Non-road mobile sources, e.g., construction equipment, agricultural equipment, lawn and garden equipment

  3. Non-road Diesel Emissions—PM 2.5Percent Contribution by Category Diesel sources make up 73% of non-road emissions from all fuels Source: Tennessee 2002 Draft Emissions Inventory

  4. 18 Nonattainment Counties in Tennessee • 17 counties in 8-hour ozone nonattainment* • 9 counties in ozone Early Action Compacts • 6 counties in PM 2.5 nonattainment* • Knoxville region (5 counties) and Chattanooga (1 county) * Some counties nonattainment for both ozone and PM 2.5 Note: County totals include partial county designations

  5. TDOT’s Clean Transportation Initiative • Comprehensive effort to reduce on- and off-road mobile source emissions • Reduce congestion (ITS, multimodal investments) • Increase use of transportation alternatives and reduce growth rate of VMT • Encourage cleaner fuels and vehicles(biofuels, retrofits, etc.) • Partner with state/local governments, MPOs and private sector on air quality projects

  6. Clean Transportation Innovations Incentives Fund • Dedicates up to $4.8 M (total FY 2005-2007) in CMAQ Program funds • Partner with owners of heavy-duty diesels to reduce emissions (existing fleets) • Project options include after treatment (retrofits), replacement, repowering, rebuilding • Encourage idling reduction and cleaner fuels • Public/private partnerships essential

  7. Clean Transportation Innovations Incentives Fund • Pilot projects for FY 2006 • Retrofit road construction equipment • Retrofit public fleets • School buses • Transit vehicles • Waste hauling vehicles • City and county public works vehicles • Idling reduction options for switchyard locomotives • Develop competitive program for FY 2007

  8. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) • Primary purpose improving air quality • Transportation projects that reduce mobile source emissions in nonattainment and maintenance areas • Non-federal match required (generally 20%) • State DOTs/MPOs - priority on diesel retrofits and other cost-effective emission reduction projects

  9. CMAQ and SAFETEA-LU • SAFETEA-LU authorized CMAQ to fund • On-road and non-road diesel vehicles or construction equipment projects • Outreach activities to diesel owners regarding diesel retrofits • Primary project selection criteria • Estimated emission reductions • Cost-effectiveness of emission reduction • EPA preparing guidance on cost-effectiveness of CMAQ projects

  10. TDOT Diesel Emissions Road Construction Pilot • TDOT pilot project in East Tennessee aims to • Assess feasibility and effectiveness of diesel retrofits for construction equipment • Develop technical information to share with other companies • Work with partner firms with existingor recently awarded contracts in PM 2.5 nonattainment counties

  11. Road Construction Pilot - Announcement and Applications • TDOT identified firms now under contract • Projects underway or recently awarded • TDOT will announce the opportunity • Partner firms will • Inventory equipment for emissions rate, hours of use, and remaining useful life • Identify specific equipment to retrofit • Select verified retrofit technologies from EPA list (e.g., diesel oxidation catalysts)

  12. Project Selection and Public-Private Partnership Agreements • TDOT will • Review applications and select projects to be funded • Develop public-private partnership agreements with successful applicants • Partner firms will • Purchase and install technologybased on the agreement • Send TDOT an invoice for 80 percentof project costs

  13. Partner Commitments • Partner firms will • Commit to use retrofitted equipment in nonattainment area for limited period • Establish idling reduction policy • Use low-sulfur fuel (<500 ppm sulfur) with oxidation catalysts or ULSD (<15 ppm sulfur) with particulate filters • Verify installation of retrofit devices and use of cleaner fuel • Notify TDOT when equipment is removed from nonattainment area

  14. Reporting Requirements • Partners will track actual equipment usage in nonattainment area to verify emission reductions • Report amount of fuel consumed or number of service hours for non-road equipment • Report miles traveled for each heavy-duty on-road vehicle • TDOT will use EPA’s retrofit calculator to develop better estimates of expected emission reductions

  15. Insights and Issues • Difficult for firms to make extended commitment to keep retrofitted equipment in nonattainment area • Because of replacement policies, larger companies tend to use fairly new equipment • Greatest emission reductions from older engines, especially unregulated engines • Earthmovers, large scrapers • Large equipment rarely used in urban projects (e.g., road widening, intersection improvements)

  16. Insights and Issues • Even with government cost-sharing, for-profit companies are reluctant to incur added expenses • Incentives necessary to encourage participation • Increased cost of cleaner fuels another barrier • Must consider engine-specific information in selecting the appropriate technology match • Older equipment a major issue • Higher emissions • Limited financial resources – equipment owners and funding opportunities

  17. Needs and Opportunities • Need for dedicated funding to share costs • CMAQ may fund pilot projects, but other dedicated funding sources are badly needed • Increased use of biodiesel • Greater emphasis on idling reduction • Future option - Contract bid specifications that require use of cleaner equipment and cleaner fuels • Raises costs of road projects when states already face highway funding shortages

More Related