1 / 19

Project #4: Experimental Testing of Allocation of Multiple UAVs

Project #4: Experimental Testing of Allocation of Multiple UAVs. Tim Arnett, Aerospace Engineering, Junior, University of Cincinnati Devon Riddle, Aerospace Engineering, Junior University of Cincinnati ASSISTED BY: Chelsea Sabo, Graduate Research Assistant Dr. Kelly Cohen, Faculty Mentor.

thea
Télécharger la présentation

Project #4: Experimental Testing of Allocation of Multiple UAVs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project #4: Experimental Testing of Allocation of Multiple UAVs Tim Arnett, Aerospace Engineering, Junior, University of Cincinnati Devon Riddle, Aerospace Engineering, Junior University of Cincinnati ASSISTED BY: Chelsea Sabo, Graduate Research Assistant Dr. Kelly Cohen, Faculty Mentor

  2. Search and Rescue Weather Observation Forest Fire Monitoring Motivation & Operational Goals of Experimental Testing • Traffic Surveillance • Border Patrol • Military

  3. Learn to interface with hardware for controller development Understand the benefits and disadvantages of using different routing algorithms for UAVs Project Goals

  4. Objective 1: Interface with cooperative control development hardware • Interface and run algorithms on AR Drones • Interface and run algorithms on AMASE • Objective 2: Validate task allocation algorithm both in simulation and experimentally • Objective 3: Test and compare cooperative control strategies for UAVs Objectives

  5. AR Drone • OptiTrack System • Software Interface • Waypoint Following Algorithm • PID Control • Fuzzy Logic Control • Potential-based Control Experimental Setup

  6. AR Drone • Commercially available quadrotor • Can be controlled by a device using wireless network adapter Experimental Setup

  7. Optitrack System • Cameras provide real time position data • Data can be imported into MatLab Experimental Setup

  8. Software Interface • PC client with wireless capability • Wireless router to connect to multiple drones Experimental Setup

  9. Waypoint Following Algorithm • PID Control • Fuzzy Logic Control • Potential-based Control Experimental Setup

  10. Communication Pathway

  11. AR Drone requires commands in text strings with values formatted as a 32-bit signed integer • Command string example • CMD = sprintf('AT*PCMD=%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d\r',i,1,0,1036831949,0,0); • fprintf(ARc, CMD) • Arguments in order are sequence, flag, roll, pitch, ascent rate, and yaw rate Command Value Conversion

  12. AMASE

  13. A simulation program. • Sets up scenarios • Runs the main simulation that is wanted • Has the capabilities of analyzing the results as the simulation is run. Basic Overview

  14. The Map • Direct XML-editing (extensible markup language) • The Event Editor • The features mentioned above are the three basic methods use for entering information into a scenario to simulate it. • Multi Flight • CMASI Important Features

  15. Common Mission Automation Services Interface • A system of interactive objects that pertain to the command and control of a UAV system. • Communicate with the components • LMCP • Defines data types and enumerations. CMASI

  16. Timeline

  17. Challenges • Modeling the system for controller • Communicating with drone(s) Conclusions

  18. Questions?

More Related