1 / 30

An estimate of the K + cross section in the reaction C+C @ 2 AGeV

An estimate of the K + cross section in the reaction C+C @ 2 AGeV. A. Sadovsky Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Dresden HADES PID meeting Ř e ž 12-14 th December 2005. Motivation Selection of K + and π ± mesons Registration efficiency correction Relative cross section normalisation

thelma
Télécharger la présentation

An estimate of the K + cross section in the reaction C+C @ 2 AGeV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An estimate of the K+ cross sectionin the reaction C+C @ 2 AGeV A. Sadovsky Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Dresden HADES PID meeting Řež 12-14th December 2005 • Motivation • Selection of K+and π±mesons • Registration efficiency correction • Relative cross section normalisation • Influence of trigger conditions • Comparison with KaoS (minimum bias conditions)

  2. Selection of K+(MdcSegment Fit and Vertex cuts) HMdcSeg1 χ2cut HMdcSeg2 χ2cut RMdcSeg1 [mm] RMdcSeg1 [mm] ZMdcSeg1 [mm] ZMdcSeg1 [mm]

  3. Selection of K+ (matching with META and cuts on β2·dE/dx) Counts MDC-META matching cut

  4. Selection of K+(Runge Kutta χ2-cut and p vs. m2-plot) All cuts, but RK remove ≈80% of MetaMatch track candidates χ2RK cut remove ≈30% from left over After all quality cuts only about 15% left to be used for K+ selection see below: No cuts After all cuts, but χ2RK After all cuts and χ2RK

  5. Selection of K+(slices with different momentum)

  6. Registration efficiency correction for K+ (simulation) Pluto: 10*106 only K+tracks (T=88 MeV, βr=0.3) hGeant with realistic settings for Nov02 DST with Hydra: Nov02/gen3-like Analysis, K+ cuts (micro DST‘s) like for real data

  7. p [MeV/c] (Sector 0) ° Registration efficiency correction for K+(TOF/TOFINO) Ratio of K+ counts distribution after Pluto /PGHAC (Pluto+Geant+Hydra+Analysis+Cuts)

  8. Selected K+ Counts Nov02/gen3 DST 166 106 events 3686 tracks identified as K+ in S0+S3 Background contribution less than 30% i.e. N(K+)/N(bg) = 2562/1124 = 2.3 Average significance = 42.2 N(K+) =124 N(bg) = 31 m [MeV/c2]

  9. Selection of π±(same quality cuts as for K+) • π±PID selection: • only for TOF region • graphical cut • 300<p<1000 [MeV/c] • π- 40° <  < 72° • π+ 46° <  < 82° • (SIM)  admixture of other particles < 3% TOF

  10. π±(registration efficiency correction) Tracking efficiency (hit registration and algorithm) Decays (for unstable particles) Registered (EXP) Corrected (EXP)

  11. Cross section(how-to approach) Target, beam intensity and trigger conditions Correction efficiency of hit registration, tracking performance and quality selection (cuts)

  12. Cross section(extrapolation to 4π) While measuring only a part of total phase space one needs extrapolation: Technique for Ntot /Npart correction is Pluto or URQMD generator

  13. Cross section(relative normalisation) C+C@1.8AGeV pion cross sections are from KaoS (F.Laue at al. Eur.Phys.J., 397-410, A9, 2000) π+ π- No corrections are taken into account (background, trigger, energy scaling) !!!

  14. Cross section correction(beam energy scaling) C+C pion cross section Scaling from KaoS 1.8AGeV  2.0AGeV (C.Sturm at al. PRL, 86:39-42, 2001) Factor 1.106 to be used π±and K+ cross sections

  15. b Multiplicity trigger(normalisation to minimum bias) Nov02 – C+C@2AGeV experiment 85% events multiplicity trigg ≥ 4 15% events multiplicity trigg ≥ 2 Apartdepends on impact parameter b Apart2 Apart1 Apart α=1 for π (P.Senger NP, A685, 2001) α=1.64 for K+ taken from measurements NiNi@1.0AGeV, NiNi@1.8AGeV R.Barth at al. (PRL, 78, 1997) Applied for C+C@2AGeV <Apart> = f(<b>) cut-off approx. w. „solid sphere model“

  16. Multiplicity trigger(normalisation to minimum bias) C+C@2AGeVsimulation 107 UrQMD events impact parameter distribution for minimum bias events and for events providing at least 2 (or 4) charged tracks in HADES acceptance (22°<  < 86°) <bm2&π>=3.146 [fm] (15%) <bm2&K>=2.480 [fm] mean impact parameter <bm4&π>=2.569 [fm] (85%) <bm4&K>=2.155 [fm] <bmin.b> =3.888 [fm] <btriggπ>=2.66 [fm] <btriggK>=2.20 [fm] “solid sphere model” approximation <Apart> = f(<b>) <Apart>min.b.=6.00 <Apart>triggπ=11.26 <Apart>triggK=13.75 Enhancement compared with minimum bias K+/pion ratio is influenced by the multiplicity trigger compared to minimum bias:

  17. Electron trigger(LVL2 / LVL1 trigger normalisation) C+C@2AGeVexperiment Nov02/gen3 DST 166 106 events LVL1 fraction=53.78% LVL2 fraction=46.22% using π+ yeld in registration area (300<p<1000) MeV/c (46° <  < 82°) (w/o registration eff. correction) (with registration eff. correction) If normalising by LVL1 events (1.000) x 53.78% + (0.899) x 46.22% = 95.37% Considering LVL1+LVL2 events together leads to lower π+ yeld estimate=>correction Assuming the same behavior for K+ one corrects for 1.0/0.954=1.048 when taking into account LVL2 events (as LVL1 events). Finally normalisation of LVL2 to LVL1trigger gives scaling factor 1.048

  18. K+ total cross section(at minimum bias conditions) x 0.765 Background (-23.5% for K+ in TOF) x 1.106 π± scaling (1.8  2.0)AGeV x 1/2.08 Multiplicity trigger (LVL1) ? 1.048 Electron trigger (LVL2) admixture Errors of approximations are not included The corresponding KaoS measurement for C+C@2AGeV (F.Laue PRL, 82,1999) HADES measurement is 42% larger

  19. BACKUPSLIDES

  20. Motivation • K+ production in collisions of C+C @ 2AGeV is a rare process • Strong requirements to tracking and detector performance • Survey HADES potential towards rare hadronic channels • Supplementary independent measurement to KaoS and FOPI • Investigation of strangeness production and ratio

  21. Results K+ Pluto K+ experiment corrected pt [MeV/c] pt [MeV/c] Y Y =88° =88° Binning N1 Binning N2 =44° =44° pt [MeV/c] pt [MeV/c] =18° =18° Y0=Y/Ycm-1 Y0=Y/Ycm-1

  22. mt-m0 spectra (binning N1) TB=62.4±3.1 [MeV] TB=60.6±1.6 [MeV] TB=60.7±1.2 [MeV] TB=69.9±1.2 [MeV] TB=80.7±1.9 [MeV] TB=72.2±1.3 [MeV] NB: Errors are stat. Full bins selection from p-acceptance. Fit function:

  23. mt-m0 spectra (binning N2) TB=53.4±1.6 [MeV] TB=59.4±1.5 [MeV] TB=61.0±1.1 [MeV] TB=71.0±1.3 [MeV] TB=82.0±2.5 [MeV] TB=82.4±1.5 [MeV] NB: Errors are stat. Full bins selection from p-acceptance. Fit function:

  24. Preliminary results from mt-m0 spectra Binning N1 Binning N2 TB [MeV] TB [MeV] Y0 Y0 dN/dY0 dN/dY0 Y0 Y0 • Systematic errors are not taken into account • Absolute normalization for dN/dY0 is not provided yet

  25. Comparison with other experiments (EkinCM-spectra) HADES C+C@2AGeV vs. KaoS C+C@1.8AGeV KaoS data scanned from F.Laue et al. PRL 82(1999)1640 T=(70.4±3.2) MeV Normalization of HADES data not performed yet

  26. Comparison with other experiments (mt-m0 spectra) HADES C+C@2AGeV vs. FOPI Ru+Ru(Zr)@1.69AGeV FOPI data and fits: dissertation of K. Wisniewski HADES extends (mt-m0) - range compared to FOPI Normalization of HADES data not performed yet

  27. Comparison with other experiments (mt-m0 spectra) HADES C+C@2AGeV vs. FOPI Ni+Ni@1.93AGeV FOPI data and fits NPA 625(1997)755 HADES extends (mt-m0) - range compared to FOPI Ni+Ni@1.93AGeV C+C@2AGeV C+C@2AGeV -1.3<Y0<-1.1 x1000 (Ni+Ni) -0.9<Y0<-0.7 x10 (Ni+Ni) -1.3<Y0<-1.1 x100 (Ni+Ni) -0.8<Y0<-0.6 x10 (C+C) -0.7<Y0<-0.5 x1 (Ni+Ni) -0.6<Y0<-0.4 x1 (C+C) Normalisation of HADES data not performed yet

  28. Results (Simulation Nov02/gen3) Simulation C+C@2AGeV (Nov02/gen3) 71·106 events 3026 K+ tracks (incl. bg<15%) The same cuts and correction as for experimental data K+ Pluto pt [MeV/c] Y =88° Binning N1 =88° Binning N2 =44° =44° pt [MeV/c] pt [MeV/c] =18° =18° Y0=Y/Ycm-1 Y0=Y/Ycm-1

  29. Results from simulation mt-m0 spectra Binning N1 Binning N2 TB [MeV] TB [MeV] Y0 Y0 dN/dY0 dN/dY0 Y0 Y0 • Systematic errors are not taken into account • Absolute normalisation for dN/dY0 is not provided yet

  30. Summary and outlook • K+ identification with HADES • possible for 250MeV<p<500MeV (TOFINO), 200MeV<p<700MeV (TOF) • 2562 K+ from 166*106 events • Y and mt spectra deduced • Slope parameters are in agreement with previous experiments • KaoS measured K+ production from C+C system at beam kinetic energies: • 1.8 AGeV for (28°,52°) and (56°,64°), N(K+)=17000 • 2.0 AGeV for (28°,44°), N(K+)=11000 • HADES extends the acceptance of C+C towards target rapidity at • 2.0 AGeV for (30°,83°), N(K+)= 2562 • (HADES specific measurement -0.9<Y0<-0.7) • To do list: • Absolute normalization to the beam particles • Investigation of systematical errors influence

More Related