1 / 68

Ben Edwards 11 th Feb 2014

Ben Edwards 11 th Feb 2014. Major Trauma. Outline. Major trauma networks Trauma team Initial Assessment and Management <c>ABCDE Damage control resuscitation Hypotensive & haemostatic resuscitation Damage control surgery. Trauma: Who cares?.

thetis
Télécharger la présentation

Ben Edwards 11 th Feb 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ben Edwards 11th Feb 2014 Major Trauma

  2. Outline • Major trauma networks • Trauma team • Initial Assessment and Management • <c>ABCDE • Damage control resuscitation • Hypotensive & haemostatic resuscitation • Damage control surgery

  3. Trauma: Who cares? Emergency Admissions:A journey in the right direction? A report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2007) A report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2007)

  4. History • NCEPOD publish “Trauma: who cares?” in 2007 • Major criticisms of current delivery of trauma care • Keith Willett appointed National Director of Trauma Care in 2009 • National Major Trauma Centre model of care started April 2012 • Full designation of major trauma centres in April 2013 • Overseen by regional trauma networks

  5. Why the change • To understand why change was needed must understand who is affected • Predominantly young people of working age • Become tax consumers instead of tax contributors • Unnecessary loss of life • 20 lives/yr in Yorkshire & Humber region

  6. Before the Major Trauma Network Injury Nearest A&E unit Tertiary referral centre

  7. Why is that a problem? • Local hospitals • Lack of specialist services • Cardiothoracic • Vascular • Neurosurgery • Interventional Radiology • Necessitates transfer • Causes delay • Delay and transfer = worse outcomes

  8. Yorkshire and the HumberMajor Trauma Network Q: What is a trauma network? A: a collaboration between providers and commissioners to deliver optimal major trauma care services in a geographical area. • It includes : • Major Trauma Centres • Pre-hospital Care • All other hospitals that deal with trauma – Trauma Units and local A&Es • Rehabilitation

  9. Why is it needed? • A network is expected to improve outcomes for patients with Major Trauma through: • “Better co-ordination of care where patients are moved in a timely manner to the location best able to provide for their needs.” • This applies to every stage from initial care to rehabilitation. • Improving the quality of care of the severely injured patient at every stage of the pathway

  10. Benefits? • 2011 SCHARR research estimates that between 5-15% more lives could be saved. • In Yorkshire and the Humber = 28 - 33 per year. • Y&H Regional Trauma Network would be cost effective if effective implementation costs less than £6–7 million • (Source: Cost Effectiveness of Regional Networks for Major Trauma in England 2011) • LOS reduction of 4 days = £5 million saving per annum • earlier transfers • more rapid and definitive care • fewer complications • (Source: NCEPOD Regional trauma system guidance for commissioners 2009)

  11. More benefits? Reduction in the cost to the taxpayer • more people returning to non-dependent life • reduced disability • increased returns to work • fewer demands on social care • i.e. More people that pay tax rather than consume taxes!

  12. Financial implications for hospitals • Tariff for patient care = income • Previously more injuries = the same money • Not rewarded for multiple operations etc. • Best practice tariff (BPT) change that • Multiple injuries = additional money (+£1500) • Trauma patients now bring in more money • But only if certain criteria are fulfilled

  13. But not such a good deal for TUs • Loss of complex patients = loss income • But same levels of staffing required • Loss of skills & training • Lack of motivation to maintain standards of trauma care

  14. Pathway Phasing Current Pathway Development to April 2014 Phase 1 From April 2012 Phase 2 From April 2013 Phase 3 From April 2014

  15. Pre Hospital Care • Pre hospital triage tool • Bypass of trauma units for patients who trigger • Experience paramedic in control room to facilitate process • If patient unstable or >45 minutes from MTC consider going straight to trauma unit • Development of ‘Stop, Sort, Go’ protocol

  16. Trauma Scoring Systems • The need to classify injuries objectively is fundamental to the delivery of trauma care (and its evaluation) • Allows data collection • TARN • Money • Comparisons between centres

  17. Classification • Physiological • Trauma Score (TS) • Revised Trauma Score (RTS) • Anatomical • Injury Severity Score (ISS) • Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) • Not all injuries apparent at presentation

  18. Trauma Score • Respiratory rate • Respiratory expansion • Systolic BP • Capillary refill time • GCS • Used to calculate need for transfer • Relates to mortaility

  19. Revised Trauma Score • Weights more to head injury • GCS • Systolic BP • RR • Limitations in assessing GCS • Alcohol, illicit drugs • Can substitute best motor response

  20. Abbreviated Injury Scale • Simple numerical method for grading and comparing injuries by severity. • Originally intended for use with vehicular injuries • Grades injuries on an scale ranging from 1 (minor) to 6 (lethal) • Does not reflect combined effects multiple injuries • Basis of ISS

  21. Injury Severity Score (ISS) • Used in calculation of BPT • Sum of squares of the highest AIS grade in the 3 most severely injured body regions. • Six body regions are defined • thorax, abdomen and visceral pelvis, head and neck, face, bony pelvis and extremities, and external structures. • Only one injury per body region is allowed. The ISS ranges from 1-75, and an ISS of 75 is assigned to anyone with an AIS of 6.

  22. On arrival met by trauma team

  23. In Hospital -Trauma Team Activation

  24. Resuscitation Priorities Trauma team allows for horizontal assessment of: • <C> = Control of exsanguinating haemorrhage • A = Airway with C-spine protection • B = Breathing with ventilation • C = Circulation with haemorrhage control • D = Disability: Neurologic status • E = Exposure / Environment

  25. <C> = Control of exsanguinating haemorrhage • Direct pressure • Indirect pressure • Elevate • Tourniquet • Haemostatic agents • Don’t forget scalp wounds

  26. New ways of managing penetrating trauma • Quick to use • Apply band around limb • Twist ‘windlass’ until arterial bleeding stops • Document time of application CAT Tourniquet

  27. New ways of managing penetrating trauma CELOX Gauze • Gauze dressing impregnated with chitosan (shrimp shells) • Bonds to specific sites on red blood cells and platelets, forming a gel like clot • Stuff/pack into wound and apply direct pressure over

  28. A = Airway with C-spine protection • Time critical that the airway is secured as rapidly as possible if GCS<9 • National standard is <30mins • Facilitates rapid transfer for WBCT • Direct link to neurological outcome • But the trauma airway is likely to be difficult • NAP4 also shows that airway complications are most likely to occur in the ED

  29. Absolute Indications for intubation • Inability to maintain and protect own airway regardless of conscious level • Inability to maintain adequate oxygenation with less invasive manoeuvres • Inability to maintain normocapnia (spontaneous PaCO2 <4.0 kPa or >6.0 kPa) • GCS ≤8 • Patients undergoing transfer with: • Deteriorating conscious level (≥2 points on motor scale) • Significant facial injuries • Seizures. (See NICE Guidelines for intubation and ventilation in the presence of brain injury)

  30. Relative Indications for Intubation • Haemorrhagic shock, particularly in the presence of an evolving metabolic acidosis. • Agitated patient (hypoxia & hypovolaemia are prime causes of agitation) • Multiple painful injuries (humanitarian) • Transfer to another area of the hospital (e.g. vascular Angio/theatres/GITU)

  31. Securing the Airway • Recommend modified RSI • Assume c-spine is unstable • In line immobilisation • Remove front of hard collar (occludes access to cricothyroid membrane) • Elective use of bougee • Uncut ETT if any burns/blasts • Tape rather than tie to reduce venous pressure

  32. Drugs • Careful dose titration required (hypovolaemia and acidosis). • If head injury is suspected attenuate the stress response to laryngoscopy (alfentanil 10µg kg-1 is effective) • Ketamine is the agent of choice in the haemodynamically unstable patient • not contraindicated in brain injury (minimises hypotension in those with hypovolaemia and abnormal cerebral autoregulation) • Etomidate • not recommended due to adrenal suppression • Contra-indicated in head injury (uncouples cerebral blood flow and metabolism)

  33. Post Intubation Care • Aim VT 6-8 ml/kg, Pmax< 30, arterial pC02 4.5 – 5 kPa • Consider inserting an arterial line • Changing airway pressure may indicate a change in compliance • pneumothorax or lung injury. • Maintain anaesthesia using volatile or infusions (i.e. Propofol/Alfentanyl) • Volatile anaesthesia can increase cerebral blood flow &ICP • < 1 MAC, switch to i.v. agents as soon as possible.

  34. B = Breathing with ventilation • Immediately life threatening injuries requiring urgent intervention • Tension & open pneumothorax • Decompression (needle or thoracostomy) • Haemothorax • Drainage and volume replacement • Flail chest • Rib fracture fixation • Tamponade • Temporising pericardiocentesis • Definitive or resuscitative thoracotomy

  35. B = Breathing with ventilation Imaging • Obtain CXR at the earliest opportunity • rib fractures and pneumothorax (particularly anterior) may be missed and only detected clinically or on CT scan –don’t delay CT • Chest ultrasound is useful investigation for pneumothorax and tamponade

  36. Open Thoracostomy •  Chest drain without the actual intercostal catheter: • The wound is left open. • Enables rapid decompression of a tension pneumothorax in an intubated patient • Positive pressure ventilation prevents the thoracostomy wound from acting as an open, ‘sucking’, chest wound.

  37. C – Circulation with haemorrhage control The key is to turn the tap off! • In the interim, the core principles are that of Damage Control Resuscitation • Concepts primarily conceived in the military • Improved survival from battlefield trauma • Landmark paper from Jansen et al Jansen J et al. Damage control resuscitation for patients with major trauma. BMJ 2009;338:b1778

  38. Classes of Shock

  39. The lethal triad • Proven detrimental effects of aggressive fluid resuscitation • Hypothermia • Independent predictor of mortality • Acidosis • Higher mortality in critical care • Coagulopathy • > 4x mortality

  40. Turning off the tap • Measures as per <C> • Bind the pelvis • Splint the femur(s) • Damage control surgery • Interventional radiology

  41. Damage control resuscitation • Permissive hypotension + haemostatic resuscitation + damage control surgery • Permissive hypotension = “A strategy of deferring or restricting fluid administration until haemorrhage is controlled, while accepting a limited period of suboptimum end organ perfusion” • Haemostatic resuscitation = very early use of blood and blood products as primary resuscitation fluids Jansen J et al. Damage control resuscitation for patients with major trauma. BMJ 2009;338:b1778

  42. Permissive hypotension • Should not be used in head injuries • Most applicable to penetrating trauma • Other terms • Hypotensive resuscitation • Delayed resuscitation Jansen J et al. Damage control resuscitation for patients with major trauma. BMJ 2009;338:b1778

  43. Bickel WH et. al • Randomised 2 groups with penetrating trauma and BP <90 • Immediate • Delayed • BP >100 post anaesthesia Bickell WH et al, NEJM 1994; 331:1105-9

  44. Outcomes • Statistically significant findings: • Survival higher in delayed group • Stay shorter in delayed group • Trend towards • Higher intra-op blood loss in the immediate group • ? More complications in immediate group • Not statistically significant Bickell WH et al, NEJM 1994; 331:1105-9

  45. Outcome of Patients with Penetrating Torso Injuries, According to Treatment Group

More Related