SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Semantic Trust Management System: Integrating Reputation-based Decisions

thomasweaver avatar
thomasweaver
8 diapositives · 180 Views · Jan 07, 2020

This project integrates trust management algorithms, credential repository, similarity evaluation, and gossip protocols to enhance reputation-based decision-making. By integrating components and extending the PDP, the system assesses similarity, exchanges credentials among peers, and makes decisions based on reputation. The interface includes Java/Prolog and interfaces with XACML/SAML for secure communication.

#semantic trust management system: integrating reputation-based decisions #semantic trust management system: integrating reputation-based decisions ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Semantic Trust Management System: Integrating Reputation-based Decisions - slide 1
01 / 8Semantic Trust Management System: Integrating Reputation-based Decisions
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Semantic Trust Management System: Integrating Reputation-based Decisions
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. TM algorithm PEP PDP Access request Request AC Policy TM Policy Decision Credential request Reputation-based Similarity Evaluator Predicate Layer Semantic Web Library Constraint rules Global Ontology Local Ontology Similarity Credential Repository Gossip protocol

  2. What is done • PDP • SWI-Prolog (http://www.swi-prolog.org/) • Credential repository • PostgreSQL (http://www.postgresql.org/) • Request Format • XACML + SAML Profile (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml)

  3. Project 1b&2b Project 2a XACML Project 1a SWI Prolog SWI Prolog TM algorithm PEP PDP Access request Request AC Policy TM Policy Credential request Decision Reputation-based Similarity Evaluator Predicate Layer Semantic Web Library Constraint rules Project 3a Global Ontology Local Ontology Similarity Credential Repository Gossip protocol Project 3b PostgreSQL

  4. Project 1a (2 persons) • PEP and interface with PDP • Component that waits for requests (also from other computers) and forwards the requests to the PDP • Interface between this component and PDP • Translate XML requests into Prolog queries • Return decision made by the PDP to the PEP • Requirements • Format of request (XACML-based) to PEP • Ac: Subj, obj, action, list of creds. • Cred: Subj, Attr, list of creds. • Interface Java/Prolog • e.g., JPL (http://www.swi-prolog.org/packages/jpl/java_api/index.html)

  5. Project 2a (2 persons) • TM Algorithms • Chain Discovery (RT algorithms) • Simulations in Distributed Systems • Requirements • Java interface between Prolog engines • No requirements on the msg exchange format at this stage of the project Reference Ninghui Li, William H. Winsborough, and John C. Mitchell. Distributed Credential Chain Discovery in Trust Management. Journal of Computer Security, volume 11, number 1, pp. 35-86, February 2003.

  6. Project 1b&2b (4 persons) • Integrate 1a and 2a • Integrate the TM Algorithm into the PEP-PDP • Request of remote credentials specified as XACML/SAML requests • Credential Issuing • XACML/SAML

  7. Project 3a (3 persons) • Extend the PDP with a component for reputation-based decisions • Component for assessing the similarity between two concepts • Retrieve similarity credentials from the repository • Implement similarity metrics • Interface between PDP and this component

  8. Project 3b (3 persons) • Design a protocol for the exchange of similarity credentials among peers. • Gossip protocols • Reference • A. Demers, D. Greene, C. Hauser, W. Irish, J. Larson, S. Shenker, H. Stuygis, D. Swinehart, D. Terry, “Epidemic algorithms for replicated database maintenance”, Proc. ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, 1987. • S. Hedetniemi, S. Hedetniemi, A. Liestman, “A survey of gossiping and broadcasting in communication networks”, Networks 18(1988).