1 / 31

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation. Predicting performance. Predictive Models. Translate empirical evidence into theories and models that can influence design. Performance measures Quantitative Time prediction Working memory constraints Competence measures Focus on certain details, others obscured.

tiger-nolan
Télécharger la présentation

Predictive Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Predictive Evaluation Predicting performance

  2. Predictive Models • Translate empirical evidence into theories and models that can influence design. • Performance measures • Quantitative • Time prediction • Working memory constraints • Competence measures • Focus on certain details, others obscured

  3. Two Types of User Modeling • Stimulus-Response • Practice law • Fitt’s law • Cognitive – human as interpreter/predictor – based on Model Human Processor (MHP) • Key-stroke Level Model • Low-level, simple • GOMS (and similar) Models • Higher-level (Goals, Operations, Methods, Selections)

  4. Power law of practice • Tn = T1n-a • Tn to complete the nth trial is T1 on the first trial times n to the power -a; a is about .4, between .2 and .6 • Skilled behavior - Stimulus-Response and routine cognitive actions • Typing speed improvement • Learning to use mouse • Pushing buttons in response to stimuli • NOT learning

  5. Power Law: Tn = T1n-a If first trial (T1) takes 5 seconds, how long will future trials take? When will improvements level off? (a = -0.4)

  6. Uses for Power Law of Practice • Use measured time T1 on trial 1 to predict whether time with practice will meet usability criteria, after a reasonable number of trials • How many trials are reasonable? • Predict how many practices will be needed for user to meet usability criteria • Determine if usability criteria is realistic

  7. Fitts’ Law • Models movement times for selection tasks • Paul Fitts: war-time human factors pioneer • Basic idea: Movement time for a well-rehearsed selection task • Increases as the distance to the target increases • Decreases as the size of the target increases

  8. D W STOP START Moving • Move from START to STOP Index of Difficulty: ID = log2 ( 2D/W )(in unitless bits) width of target distance

  9. MT ID Movement Time MT = a + b*ID or MT = a + b log2 (2D/W) • Empirical measurement establishes constants a and b • Different for different devices and different ways the same device is used.

  10. Questions • What do you do in 2D? • h x l rect:one way is ID = log2(d/min(w, l) + 1) • Should take into account direction of approach

  11. Applications • When does it apply? • How used in interface design?

  12. Keystroke Level Model (KLM) • Also developed by Card, Moran, and Newell (1983) • Skilled users performing routine tasks • Assumes error-free performance • Analyze only observable behaviors • Keystrokes, mouse movements • Assigns times to basic human operations - experimentally verified

  13. KSLM Accounts for • Keystroking TK • Mouse button press TB • Pointing (typically with mouse) TP • Hand movement betweenkeyboard and mouse TH • Drawing straight line segments TD • “Mental preparation” TM • System Response time TR

  14. Step One : MS Word Find Command • Use Find Command to locate a six character word • H (Home on mouse) • P (Edit) • B (click on mouse button - press/release) • P (Find) • B (click on mouse button) • H (Home on keyboard) • 6K (Type six characters into Find dialogue box) • K (Return key on dialogue box starts the find)

  15. Using KSLM - Step Two • Place M operators Rule 0a. In front of all K’s that are NOT part of argument strings (ie, not part of text or numbers) Rule 0b. In front of all P’s that select commands (not arguments)

  16. Step Two : MS Word Find Command H (Home on mouse) MP (Edit) B (click on mouse button) MP (Find) B (click on mouse button) H (Home on keyboard) 6K (Type six characters) MK (Return key on dialogue box starts the find) Rule 0b: Pselects command Rule 0b: Pselects command Rule 0a: Kis argument

  17. Using KSLM - Step 3 Remove M’s according to heuristic rules (Rules relate to chunking of actions) Rule 1. Anticipated by prior operation • H MP ->HP(pointing to menu item is anticipated by moving hand to mouse) Rule 2. If string of MKs is a single cognitive unit (such as a command name), delete all but first • MKMKMK -> MKKK (same as M3K) (type “runis a chunk) Rule 3. Redundant terminator, such as )) or rtnrtn Rule 4. If K terminates a constant string, such as command-rtn, then delete M • M2K(ls)MK(rtn) -> M2K(ls)K(rtn) (typing “ls” command in Unix followed by rtn is a chunk)

  18. Step 3 : MS Word Find Command H (Home on mouse) MP (Edit) B (click on mouse button) MP (Find) B (click on mouse button) H (Home on keyboard) 6K (Type six characters) MK (Return key on dialogue box starts the find) Rule 1 delete M H anticipates P Rule 4 Keep M

  19. Using KSLM - Step 4 • Plug in real numbers from experiments • K: .08 sec for best typists, .28 average, 1.2 if unfamiliar with keyboard • B: down or up - 0.1 secs; click - 0.2 secs • P: 1.1 secs • H: 0.4 secs • M: 1.35 secs • R: depends on system; often less than .05 secs

  20. Step 4 : MS Word Find Command H (Home on mouse) P (Edit) B (click on mouse button - press/release) MP (Find) B (click on mouse button) H (Home on keyboard) 6K (Type six characters into Find dialogue box) MK (Return key on dialogue box starts the find) • Timings • H = 0.40, P = 1.10, B = 0.20, M = 1.35, K = 0.28 • 2H, 2P, 2B, 2M, 7K • Predicted time = 8.06 secs

  21. Example: MS Windows Menu Selection • Get hands on mouse • Select from menu bar with click of mouse button • The “pull down” menu appears • Select desired item from the pull down menu

  22. Step 1: MS Windows Menu H (Home on mouse) P (point to menu bar item) B (left-click with mouse button) P (point to menu item) B (left-click with mouse button)

  23. Step 2: MS Windows Menu - Add M’s H (get hand on mouse) MP (point to menu bar item) B (left-click with mouse button) MP (point to menu item) B (left-click with mouse button) Rule 0b: Pselects command Rule 0b: Pselects command

  24. Step 3: MS Windows Menu - Delete M’s • H (get hand on mouse) • MP (point to menu bar item) • B (left-click with mouse button) • MP (point to menu item) • B (left-click with mouse button) Rule 1 Manticipated by H Keep M

  25. Step 4: MS Windows Menu Calculate Time • H (get hand on mouse) • P (point to menu bar item) • B (left-click with mouse button) • MP (point to menu item) • B (left-click with mouse button) • Textbook timings (all in seconds) • H = 0.40, P = 1.10, B = 0.20, M = 1.35 • H, 2P, 2B, 1 M • Total predicted time = 4.35 sec

  26. Alternative Menu Selection • Operator sequence • H(mouse)P(to menu item)B(down)PB(up) • Now place Ms • H(mouse)MP(to menu item)B(down)MPB(up) • Selectively remove Ms • H(mouse)MP(to menu item)B(down)MPB(up) • Textbook timings (all in seconds) • H = 0.40, P = 1.10, B = 0.10 for up or down, M = 1.35 • H, 2P, 2 B, 1 M • Total predicted time = 4.15 sec • Alternative is predicted to be .2 secs faster than typical, about 5% Rule 0b Rule 0b Rule 1 Delete H anticipates P

  27. KSLM Comparison Problem • Are keyboard accelerators always faster than menu selection? • Use MS Windows to compare • Menu selection of File/Print (previous example estimated 4.35 secs.) • Keyboard accelerator • ALT-F to open the File pull down menu • P key to select the Print menu item • Assume hands start on keyboard

  28. KSLM Comparison:Keyboard Accelerator for Print • Use Keyboard for ALT-F P (hands already there) • K(ALT)K(F)K(P) • MK(ALT)MK(F)MK(P) • MK(ALT)K(F)MK(P) • 2M + 3K = 2.7 + 3K • Times for K based on typing speed • Good typist, K = 0.12 s, total time = 3.06 s • Average typist, K = 0.28 s, total time = 3.54 s • Non-typist, K = 1.20 s, total time = 6.30 s • Time with mouse was 4.35 sec • Conclusion: Accelerator keys not faster than mouse for non-typists First K anticipates second K

  29. What if you started on the mouse? • Use Keyboard for ALT-F P (hands already there) • H K(ALT)K(F)K(P) • H MK(ALT) K(F)MK(P) • H MK(ALT)K(F)MK(P) • H + 2M + 3K = 3.1 + 3K • Times for K based on typing speed • Good typist, K = 0.12 s, total time = 3.46 s • Average typist, K = 0.28 s, total time = 3.94 s • Menu selection was 4.35 sec when starting on keyboard • To start on mouse its 4.35 – H = 3.95 seconds • Conclusion: Hmmm… not faster for average typists

  30. Comparison • Consider: compare selecting a menu item in a right-click popup menu vs. selecting the same menu item from menu in menu bar • What would Fitt’s Law say? • What would KSLM say?

  31. One more practice • Draw through text and make it bold • By pointing to BOLD icon in floating palette • By selecting BOLD from pull-down menu

More Related