1 / 0

Evaluating Faculty Course Feedback: Online vs. Paper Methods

This overview explores the pros and cons of online versus paper faculty course evaluations. Online evaluations offer significant advantages, including no class time disruption, ample time for thoughtful feedback, and the potential for richer, more anonymous comments. They are also safeguarded against tampering and loss. Additionally, when integrated with D2L, online evaluations provide convenience and automated reminders, enhancing the overall evaluation process for both students and faculty.

tim
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Faculty Course Feedback: Online vs. Paper Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FACULTY COURSE EVALUATIONSOnline versus Paper

    IT Center Administration
  2. Overview of Online Pro’s and Con’s Pro’s Doesn’t use class time More time for evaluating More, deeper comments due to time, typing ease, anonymity Protected from tampering and loss Convenient if integrated with D2L, with automated reminders Green, with associated savings on paper forms Lower cost to administer Access to data, faster turnaround Con’s Lower participation rate Inconvenient for students in non-D2L classes IT Center Administration
  3. Online Participation Rate Numerousstudies indicate lower participation does not materially change results: McGill University University of Minnesota Brigham Young University Texas Tech University Cornell University University of North Carolina CSU, Northridge Farleigh Dickinson University Murdoch University Georgia State University Marquette University Drexel University (See FAQs, McGill University and Krajewski’s annotated bibliography, Augsburg College) IT Center Administration
  4. Response Rates at MSU Using or Have Used Online Evals at MSU: AgEd, Art, Arch, CoB, CS, Educ, Engl, EU, Hist, HHD, Math, Nursing, PoliSci, Plant Sciences, Sociology, Film/Photo IT Center Administration
  5. Improving Participation Rates Columbia University achieves response rates of 85% or more using intensive marketing and incentives (See Online Course Evaluation literature review, NJIT Faculty Council) Schools investigating improving response rates Yale Law Northern Arizona State Northwestern Law University of Denver Sturm Duke Law (See Krajewski’s annotated bibliography, Augsburg College) IT Center Administration
  6. Works Cited “FAQs about Response Rates and Bias in Online Course Evaluations,” Teaching and Learning Services, McGill University, July 2009, retrieved November 2009. (http://www.mcgill.ca/files/tls/ResponseRatesandBiasOnlineCourseEvaluationsJuly09.pdf) Krajewski, Scott, annotated bibliography, Augsburg College, 2005, retrieved November 2009. (http://web.augsburg.edu/~krajewsk/evals/annotated-biblio.pdf) “On-line Course Evaluation,” literature review by NJIT Faculty Council, October 2008, retrieved November, 2009. (http://www.njit.edu/about/pdf/online-student-evaluation-supportingmaterial-2008-10-13.pdf) IT Center Administration
More Related