80 likes | 181 Vues
Learn the difference between traditional and sustainable urban transport planning in Sofia on May 4, 2012. Gain insights on barriers, tools, and best practices for effective planning. Contact Frank Wefering, Sebastian Bührmann, and Ivo Cé for more information.
E N D
Training Module extra: The difference between Traditional urban transport planning and Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Technical Training Workshop, Sofia, 4 May 2012 Presentation prepared by Frank Wefering and Sebastian Bührmann (both Rupprecht Consult) and Ivo Cré, Polis
From the State of the Art report • Bulgaria features in the category of countries ‘which still have to adopt SUMP’ • Planning = planning of infrastructure • No knowledge about SUMP, no technical capacity, no political support
From the SoAR (II) • Barriers • Car orientation • Lack of knowledge and resources • Lack of defined responsibilities and priorities • No public pressure, no political commitment • No perceived added-value over conventional transport plans
SUMP - an effective tool to achieve your objectives • Older style transport planning • Which scheme do we want to build? • SUMP: • What do we want to achieve? • What’s the best way to achieve it? • Do we really need to build anything? • Who do we consult? • How do we measure impacts? • With SUMP – more likely to achieve what we want • SUMP gives reasons for actions – easier to defend
Group discussions • Force field analysis: what are barriers and drivers to make the arrows in the previous slide work?
Thank you for your attention! Frank Wefering and Sebastian Bührmann, Rupprecht Consult f.wefering@rupprecht-consult.eu, s.buehrmann@rupprecht-consult.eu +49-221-606055-13 and -14 Ivo Cré, icre@polisnetwork.eu www.mobilityplans.eu