1 / 9

Geant4 results for SATIF10 Inter-comparison

This study presents the results of Geant4 simulations carried out for SATIF10, focusing on various physics lists including QGSP_BERT, QGSP_BIC, FTFP_BERT, QGS_BIC, and FTF_BIC. We found that FTFP_BERT provided the best results when compared to BNL experimental data. The integration of JENDL and Barashenkov cross-sections notably improved outcomes, particularly in iron scenarios, while also showing slight enhancements in concrete cases. The combined results using FTFP_BERT, JENDL, and Barashenkov cross-sections have been submitted as official Geant4 results.

ting
Télécharger la présentation

Geant4 results for SATIF10 Inter-comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Geant4 results for SATIF10 Inter-comparison Koi, Tatsumi SLAC

  2. Agreement level Steel 24 GeV Concrete 24 GeV Steel 2.83 GeV Concrete 2.83 GeV

  3. summary • We calculated QGSP_BERT, QGSP_BIC, FTFP_BERT, QGS_BIC and FTF_BIC • FTFP_BERT gives best result in Comparison to the BNL experiment. • Using JENDL+BarashenkovXS improves results • Much better in Iron case • Slightly better in Concrete case • FTFP_BERT + (JENDL and Barashenkov XS) result is submitted as Geant4 result • I will present about physics lists which we used at the meeting on June.

More Related