1 / 27

Redesign Analysis of a Distillation Column

Redesign Analysis of a Distillation Column. Presented By: Michael Hoepfner University of Utah 2006. Introduction. Why care about redesign?. Outline. Objective Theory Experiment Results Aspen Analysis Recommendations Conclusion / Summary . Objective. Scope

todd
Télécharger la présentation

Redesign Analysis of a Distillation Column

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Redesign Analysis of a Distillation Column Presented By: Michael Hoepfner University of Utah 2006

  2. Introduction • Why care about redesign?

  3. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  4. Objective • Scope • Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) and Water to Ethanol (EtOH) and Water • Purpose • Is the switch possible? • What are the limitations?

  5. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  6. Theory • Distillation • Is among the most common of separations • Separates compounds based on volatility • Utilizes multiple equilibrium separations

  7. Theory (cont.) T-x-y Diagram x-y Diagram Source: Perry’s Chemical Engineering Handbook, 7th Ed.

  8. Theory (cont.) • McCabe-Thiele • Simple and useful tool for defining a distillation column • Three lines can characterize the conditions Source: Seader, 2006

  9. Theory (cont.) Source: Seader, 2006

  10. Theory (cont.) • Efficiency • Liquid samples, therefore, liquid efficiency Source: King, 1971

  11. Theory (cont.) • Refractive Index (RI) was used to measure the concentration Source: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 64th Edition

  12. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  13. Experiment • Apparatus • 12 Trays with 3 inch bubble caps • Total Condenser • Partial Reboiler • Thermal couple at every tray Source: Ong, 1952

  14. Experiment (cont.) • Operate at total reflux • Collect samples for efficiency determination • Operate at 2 times the minimum reflux • Collect samples for efficiency determination • Model results in Aspen for ethanol and water

  15. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  16. Results • Obtained samples on three separate occasions • Samples are numbered by the date collected • 10/30/2006 • First run of total reflux • 11/01/2006 • Second run of total reflux • 11/06/2006 • Only run of partial reflux

  17. Results (cont.)Concentration of Samples

  18. Results (cont.) • Efficiency • Two reasonably reliable data sets • All error is at a 95% confidence interval

  19. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  20. Aspen Analysis • Aspen • Used average stage efficiency for every stage • It is possible to do separation • Limited by total condenser load • Max condenser load: 278±11 kW • Max reboiler load: 2410±20 kW

  21. Aspen Analysis (cont.)

  22. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  23. Recommendations • Ethanol separation is possible • Max feed 7.55±0.30 GPM of 15 mole % ethanol • Reboiler steam required 10.18±0.40 kg/min • By redesigning the condenser, capacity can be greatly increased • Reboiler only at ~1/6th of capacity • Allow more time for partial reflux efficiency

  24. Outline • Objective • Theory • Experiment • Results • Aspen Analysis • Recommendations • Conclusion / Summary

  25. Conclusion / Summary • Redesign analysis is an important part of chemical processing • Distillation column in senior lab is about 25.3 ± 3.7 % efficient • Ethanol and water separation is possible • Limited by the total condenser

  26. Sources • Weast, Robert C, Editor. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 64th Edition. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, 1983. p. D-253. • King, C. Judsen. Separation Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York,1971. p 603. • Ong, John N. Jr, Jack M. Whitney. “The Operation of a Laboratory Bubble-Plate Distillation Column”. University of Utah, June, 1952. • Perry, Robert H., Editor. Perry’s Chemical Engineering Handbook. 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill. New York, 1999. p. 115. • Seader, J. D., Ernest J. Henley. Separation Process Principles, 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons. Hoboken, 2006. p. 193-294. • Silcox, Geoff. “Basic Analysis of Data”. Unpublished student aid. University of Utah, 1999.

  27. Questions?

More Related