1 / 44

TGad March 2010 Report

TGad March 2010 Report. Authors:. Date: 2010-03-15. Meeting Protocol. Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot. Slide 2. Attendance. https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index Register Indicate attendance

toddd
Télécharger la présentation

TGad March 2010 Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGad March 2010 Report Authors: Date: 2010-03-15 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  2. Meeting Protocol Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot Slide 2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  3. Attendance https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index Register Indicate attendance See document 11-09-0517r0 for more details Slide 3 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status Make sure your badges are correct If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area see Adrian Stephens – adrian.p.stephens@intel.com Cell Phones Silent or Off Slide 4 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  5. Patent Policy • Following 5 slides Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  6. The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. Instructions for the WG Chair (Optional to be shown) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  7. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  8. All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html Patent Related Links If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Slide #2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  9. If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted Call for Potentially Essential Patents Slide #3 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  10. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  11. Agenda Items for the Week • Call for secretary • Review from January • Review conference calls • Approve minutes from January • Review list of New Technique proposals and strawpolls • Continue developing task group documents • Channel modeling • Evaluation methodology • Selection Procedure • Motions of drafts of task group documents • New Technique Proposals • Strawpolls • Planning for proposal presentations in May Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  12. Submissions • Evaluation Methodology • Channel Modeling • 11-10-0391-00-00ad-Tgad-channel-model-update.ppt, Alexander (Wed PM2) • 10/0372r0, "Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz”, Sawada (Wed PM2) • Selection procedure Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  13. Monday Mar 15th, 13:30 – 15:30 Call for secretary Review from January Review conference calls Approve minutes from January Review list of New Technique proposals and strawpolls Continue developing task group documents Channel modeling Evaluation methodology Selection Procedure Tuesday Mar 16th, 16:00 – 18:00 Call for secretary New Technique Proposals 1, 2, 3 Wednesday Mar 17th, 13:30 – 15:30 Call for secretary New Technique Proposals 4, 6 Wednesday Mar 17th, 16:00 – 18:00 Call for secretary New Technique Proposals 7, 8 Continue developing task group documents Channel modeling Evaluation methodology Selection Procedure Motions of drafts of task group documents Thursday Mar 18th, 8:00 – 10:00 Call for secretary Special orders of the day of New Technique strawpolls at 8:10 Continue developing task group documents Channel modeling Evaluation methodology Selection Procedure Motions of drafts of task group documents Thursday Mar 18th, 13:30 – 15:30 Call for secretary Planning for proposal presentations in May Goals for May Conference calls Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  14. Monday Mar 15th, 13:30 – 15:30 • Call for secretary • Review from January • Review conference calls • Approve minutes from January • Review list of New Technique proposals and strawpolls • Continue developing task group documents • Channel modeling • Evaluation methodology • Selection Procedure Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  15. Review from January (1/2) • Reviewed Notifications of Intent for proposals • 38 new techniques proposals (30 min each) • 12 to be presented in March • 26 to be presented in May • 4 complete proposals to be presented in May (60 min each) • Evaluation Methodology • 10/0067r0, TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations, Minyoung Park • 09/1160r3, Update on coexistence evaluation methodology, John Barr • 10/0046r1, Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology, Avinash Jain • 09/0296r16, Update to evaluation methodology document, Eldad Perahia • 10/0149r0, Proposed Evaluation Methodology Addition, Shu Kato Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  16. Review from January (2/2) • Channel Modeling • 10/0090r0, Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models, Martin Jacob (presented by Alexander Maltsev) • 10/0133r0, TGad Channel model update, Alexander Maltsev • 10/0112r1, Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60 GHz (Part 3), Hirokazu Sawada • 09/0334r6, Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev • Selection procedure • 09/935r5, selection procedure, Matt Fischer • Other technical contributions • 10/0027r0, 60 GHz in-cabin channel, Alexis Paolo Garcia Ariza • All task group document motions passed!  • Motion to adopt 09/0935r5 as the first draft of TGad selection procedure document passed 64/1/0 • Motion to adopt 09/0334r6 as the first draft of TGad channel model document passed 67/1/0 • Motion to adopt 09/0296r16 as the first draft of TGad evaluation methodology document passed 65/1/0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  17. January Minutes • Motion to approve January ‘10 TGad minutes as contained in 11-10-0043r1 • Move: John Barr • Second: Vinko Erceg Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  18. Review of Conference Calls • Cumulative minutes from 2010 in 10/0013r1 • Feb 25, 2010 10:00 ET • 11-10/0242r0, SCR Synchronization, John Stine Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  19. New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation) • 802.11ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259r1, Yuichi Morioka, Sony • Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255r1, John Stine, Self • Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264r3, André Bourdoux, IMEC • Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245r1, Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital • Simultaneous Beam Training, 10/0252r0, Hossein Taghavi, Qualcomm (withdrawn) • Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems, 10/0231r2, John Barr, NICT • Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence, 10/0249r2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research • Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250r1, Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  20. Presentations for Mon, March 15th, 13:30 – 15:30 • none Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  21. Notes for Mon, March 15th, 13:30 – 15:30 • Agenda approved • Jan minutes approved • Channel model update on Wed PM1 • Qualcomm New Technique presentation withdrawn Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  22. NT Proposal Presentations for Tuesday, March 16th, 16:00 – 18:00 • 802.11ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259r2, Yuichi Morioka, Sony • Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255r2, John Stine, Self • Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264r3, André Bourdoux, IMEC Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  23. Notes for Tuesday, March 16th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Strawpolls for 10/255r2 • Do you have sufficient information to understand the features of the technique - Synchronous Collision Resolution MAC as described in 10/0255r2? • Y: 19, N: 1, A: 32 • Do you have sufficient information on the claims made about the performance of the technique- Synchronous Collision Resolution MAC as described in 10/0255r2? • Y: 8, N: 17, A: 15 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  24. NT Proposal Presentations for Wednesday, March 17th, 13:30 – 15:30 • Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245r1, Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital • Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems, 10/0231r2, John Barr, NICT Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  25. Agenda for Wednesday, March 17th, 16:00 – 18:00 • NT Proposal presentations • Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence, 10/0249r2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research • Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250r1, Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research • Channel modeling • 10/0372r0, "Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz”, Sawada • 11-10-0391-00-00ad-Tgad-channel-model-update.ppt, Alexander Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  26. Notes for Wednesday, March 17th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Channel modeling • Vish requested to review whether two cubicle intra-cluster models are necessary • Kato requested to review wall attenuation factor used in ray tracing to generate cubicle pathloss model • Alexander to rerun ray tracing with double bounce for cubicle • No strawpolls by Yuichi for Th • Sudheer withdrew his strawpoll for Th • Agenda for Th AM1 • Strawpolls at 8:10 • No motion on channel model • Try to complete Th PM1 agenda items so we can finish early Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  27. Agenda for Thursday, March 18th, 8:00 – 10:00 • NT Strawpolls • Planning for proposal presentations in May • Goals for May • Conference calls Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  28. Strawpoll - John Stine, Self • Do you support the inclusion of the technique, -Synchronous Collision Resolution MAC as described in 10/0255r2 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 1 No: 43 Abs: 34 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  29. Strawpoll - André Bourdoux, IMEC • Do you support inclusion of the technique, -Golay complementary pair with maximum length zero-correlation zone for the estimation of the channel response and IQ imbalance as described in 10/0264r3 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 8 No: 44 Abs: 33 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  30. Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (1/3) • Do you support inclusion of the technique, -pre-BSS establishment channel scanning for 60GHz BSS as described in 10/0231r3 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 23 No: 52 Abs: 12 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  31. Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (2/3) • Do you support inclusion of the technique, -CMS sync frame transmission for 60GHz APs as described in 10/0231r3 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 13 No: 54 Abs: 19 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  32. Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (3/3) • Do you support inclusion of the technique, -CMS sync frame transmission for IBSS STAs as described in 10/0231r3 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 13 No: 58 Abs: 19 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  33. Strawpoll - Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research • Do you support inclusion of the technique,    - Options for coexistence as described in 10/0249r2 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 9 No: 58 Abs: 21 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  34. Strawpolls - Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research (1/3) • Do you support inclusion of the technique,    - Device discovery strategies with the aid of Topology IEs as described in 10/0250r1 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 8 No: 58 Abs: 19 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  35. Strawpolls - Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research (2/3) • Do you support inclusion of the technique,    - Spatial reuse strategies for stationary networks as described in 10/0250r1 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 8 No: 57 Abs: 20 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  36. Strawpolls - Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research (3/3) • Do you support inclusion of the technique,    - Spatial reuse strategies for networks with low mobilityas described in 10/0250r1 in the TGad draft amendment? • Yes: 8 No: 55 Abs: 22 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  37. Planning for proposal presentations in May • 27 New Techniques proposal requests • 3 Complete proposal requests • Time requirements • Assumptions: • Exactly 30 minutes allocation for new technique (inclusive of presentation, Q&A) • Exactly 60 minutes allocation for complete (inclusive of presentation, Q&A) • May: 9 meeting time slots • Tentative agenda • New Technique proposals • Random order of on-time notifications • Followed by random order of late notifications, as time permits • Complete proposals • Special order start time (two time slots) • Random order (on-time and late notifications) • Strawpolls • Note: In March, the nine strawpolls took 22 minutes Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  38. Strawpoll • If the series of NT proposal presentations refers to a Complete proposal, the proposers may select to present the Complete prior to the NT proposal for May and July only • Y: 51 • N: 4 • A: 7 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  39. Motion • It is the intent of TGad in the May 2010 session to present all three complete proposals, followed by NT proposals presentations. Presentation order of both the complete proposals and NT proposals will be random. • Move: Eric • Seconder: Ali • Y: 48, N: 1, A: 12 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  40. New Techniques Complete List of proposals for May Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  41. Proposal Presentation Protocol • Due to large number of presentations, we will need to be very strict on time keeping • New technique presentations will be restricted to 30 min (inclusive of presentation, Q&A) • Complete proposal presentations will be restricted to 60 min (inclusive of presentation, Q&A) • Start time of Complete proposal presentations will be fixed in agenda by special order • Presenters need to plan for Q&A as part of their time allocation • Additional questions beyond time allocation can be directed to presenter offline in person or by email or on conference calls • Strawpoll all proposals at the last TGad time slot of the session • Prior agreement to standard strawpoll template to minimize questions about the strawpoll language to reduce the time • Authors to provide chair with composed strawpoll in advance Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  42. Standard Strawpoll Templates • “Do you support inclusion of the technique, • [list technique] as described in 10/YYYYrZ in the TGad draft amendment?” • “Do you support adopting the complete proposal in 10/YYYYrZ as the first draft of the TGad amendment?” Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  43. Goals for May • Complete Proposal Presentations • New Technique Proposal Presentations • Complete Channel Model document Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  44. Conference call times • Not overlap with TGac • April 29 • 10:00-12:00 EDT • Channel modeling Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

More Related