1 / 24

Context Sensitive Solutions for Freight

Context Sensitive Solutions for Freight. By Allison L. C. de Cerreño, Ph.D. Co-Director, NYU Wagner Rudin Center for Transportation Policy & Management and Executive Director, National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), Inc. FHWA Talking Freight Seminar May 18, 2005.

tokala
Télécharger la présentation

Context Sensitive Solutions for Freight

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Context Sensitive Solutions for Freight By Allison L. C. de Cerreño, Ph.D. Co-Director, NYU Wagner Rudin Center for Transportation Policy & Management and Executive Director, National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), Inc. FHWA Talking Freight Seminar May 18, 2005

  2. CSS Definitions • CSS is a “philosophy wherein safe transportation solutions are designed in harmony with the community.” • CSS includes public participation, but… CSS ≠ public participation alone • CSS is about making a “place”

  3. Difficulties in Implementation • Competing interests • Fiscal constraints • Institutional inertia and organizational culture • Lack of contextual definition • Legal concerns

  4. CSS for Freight • Community concerns • Traffic flow/congestion • Safety/security • Air quality/environmental degradation • Economic development • Noise • Excessive light/vibrations • Land use/value

  5. CSS and Freight - Examples • Pennsylvania and NJ – Integration of CSS into All Projects • Seattle, WA – Port of Seattle’s Parks and Piers • Toledo, OH – Maumee River Crossing

  6. Courtesy: PennDOT

  7. NJ

  8. Seattle • FAST (Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma) • Central Waterfront Project • Port Parks and Public Access

  9. Seattle’s Central Waterfront Courtesy: Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce

  10. Reclaiming the Waterfront • Vision • A belief that the Port’s landholdings on the central waterfront could be a catalyst for economic development and a civic asset for the city. • Process • Studies for public comment • A concept to allow both civic and commercial uses

  11. Goals of the Team • Create a new, urban neighborhood, “rewoven” into the fabric of the city. • Develop linkages to reconnect the waterfront to establish and rekindle communities. • Respond to the historic and contextual forces of the site. • Create a place of use, where people could convene, work, play, live • Create a framework for economic success for the Port, its industries, and the city.

  12. The Vision

  13. Condos Marina Hotel Site Restaurants WTC Office Building Conference Center Cruise Terminal Parking Courtesy: Port of Seattle

  14. Bell Street Pier Today Courtesy: Port of Seattle

  15. Lenora Street Footbridge Courtesy: Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce

  16. Port of Seattle’s Parks Courtesy: Port of Seattle

  17. Parks and Public Access Sites • 60 acres of parks and public access sites • Bike trails • Pedestrian trails • Fishing piers • Habitat restoration area • Shoreline access • Viewpoints of the port Courtesy: Port of Seattle

  18. Courtesy: Port of Seattle

  19. Maumee River Crossing • Courtesy: Lookup Toledo

  20. CSS in Practice at Maumee • Primary Criteria for Determining Bridge Type • Public preference • Use of local labor and materials • Overall theme • Appearance • Secondary Criteria • Construction costs • Maintenance costs and frequency • Compatibility with approach materials • Traffic maintenance • Amount of disruption caused by construction

  21. Public Involvement Decisions • Type of Bridge • 4 Choices presented for the overall design – public favorite was the cable-stayed bridge • Design Elements • Single pylon, fan-like arrangement of the cable stays, glass incorporated into pylon with the top as a focal point, low maintenance and neutral color • Land Reuse Decisions • Fill trench left and reconnect local roads and communities, also allow access to the river

  22. The Result for Maumee Courtesy of ODOT Courtesy: Figg Bridge Engineers

  23. Maumee River Crossing Courtesy: DSI America

  24. Contact Points and Information • Me: allison.decerreno@nyu.edu • Port of Seattle: The Port & the Community • http://www.portofseattle.org • City of Seattle: Department of Planning & Development • http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/dpd/Planning/Central_Waterfront/index.asp • ODOT: Planning, Urban & Corridor Planning • http://www.dot.state.oh.us/planning/File%20Directory/ODOTstandards.htm • Maumee River Crossing – Look Up Toledo • http://www.lookuptoledo.org • TRB, Integrating Freight Facilities and Operations with Community Goals, NCHRCP Synthesis 320 (Washington DC: TRB, 2003)

More Related