170 likes | 283 Vues
This document outlines the key sessions and activities for starting the Country Programming Framework (CPF) Phase 1. It includes the establishment of a Core Team, the government's agreement with FAO, and the resource mobilization strategies necessary for CPF formulation. Additionally, it discusses conducting situation analysis, setting national priorities, and the assessment of comparative advantages to ensure effective FAO support. Group exercises focus on analyzing priorities and developing problem trees, fostering collaboration among stakeholders for successful implementation.
E N D
Day 2 Session 1: Starting the CPF
Phase 1 – StartingInstitutional Arrangements The right team is in place • Government and FAO agreement • Formal government request NOT mandatory (except in case of TCPf) • Resource mobilization for formulation (funds and staff) • Establishment of a CPF Core Team • Country level • FAO level (SRO, RO, HQ) • Management arrangements
Phase 1 – StartingConcept note & Roadmap Get the CPF Cycle in Motion • Provides the rationale for the CPF formulation: • Context analysis • Stakeholders to be involved in the process • Brief overview of FAO record in the country • Initial mapping of resource partners • Elements of communication strategy • Roadmap • Resources required for the CPF formulation Concept note can be used for TCPf request
Phase 1 – StartingValidation • Concept note & Roadmap are circulated to CPF focal points at SRO/RO/HQ: • to describe the approach • to facilitate adequate planning of human and financial support • to promote coordination and integration
Day 2 Session 2: Setting priorities
Strategic focus of FAO support Comparative Advantage assessment & Option Analysis Situation analysis
Phase 2 – Setting PrioritiesSituation Analysis Understanding challenges and opportunities ... go to the Guide at page 28 … what should not be forgotten
Group exercise (30’ minutes) Review the situation analysis: • Have key challenges been clearly assessed? • Have national strategies and policies been analyzed? • Have national priorities been clearly identified? If yes, indicate the national priorities in the Priority Matrix template • Are UN programming principles and DRR/DRM issues taken into consideration?
Day 2 Session 3: Comparative advantages
Comparative Advantages FAO Global Goals Mandate to act FAO Strategic Objectives/ORs Core Functions Actual CA at country level Position to act Capacity to act Revealed CA Resources Perceived CA Influence Partnerships Gaps
Group exercise (20’) • Complete/revise your Priority Matrix!
Day 2 Session 4: Problem Tree Analysis
Group exercise (30’) Develop your Problem Tree! Develop Cause-effect Analysis on the issue “Agricultural production and productivity”