1 / 15

SLATE

SLATE. Service Learning Academic aTtainment Evaluation Conducted for the CalServe Initiative By Sasha Neumann. Desired Outcomes. Identify the roles and expectations of partnership coordinator (or designee) in SLATE process Review results of prior studies

tommy
Télécharger la présentation

SLATE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SLATE Service Learning Academic aTtainment Evaluation Conducted for the CalServe Initiative By Sasha Neumann

  2. Desired Outcomes • Identify the roles and expectations of partnership coordinator (or designee) in SLATE process • Review results of prior studies • Define the purpose of the SLATE process • Outline the procedures for SLATE process • Provide reflection ideas for SLATE process

  3. What is SLATE? • Provides data to one of six key areas for evaluation, Section 2 – High quality service learning. • Documentation of high quality service learning • Assess student proficiency on two content standards

  4. Who benefits & how? • LEA School Boards • CalServe Partnership Coordinators • Service learning site advocates • Other key stakeholders and decision makers • Teachers better understand how high quality service-learning helps their students’ achieve content standards and • Increases student engagement • Provides evidence consistent with national research

  5. Teacher Benefits • “These projects make a difference in the students’ lives.” • “I have had the opportunity to see the powerful effects service learning has had on my students...” • “Thankful for an opportunity to explicitly look at my own professional development as a service-learning practitioner.”

  6. Who contributes to SLATE? • CalServe funded Partnerships • Partnerships identify at least 3 teachers, preferably one per grade span • CalServe Regions • STEM Projects representing various regions

  7. Who supports SLATE? • Regional Evaluation Facilitators (REFs) • Partnership Coordinators • Local Evaluator

  8. Overview of SLATE • Webinar • Teacher recruitment • Pre-flection with SL Quality Checkup Tool • Teacher Identification Form • Student Tracking Form • Reflection with SL Quality Checkup Tool • SLATE survey

  9. SLATE Timeline Partnership Coordinator (or designee) • Recruits SLATE teachers January/February • Works with SLATE teachers to complete TIF • Reviews and submits TIF to REF - February 4 • Works with SLATE teachers to complete STF • Assists SLATE teachers in completing SLATE survey • Reviews and submits STF & SLATE survey to REF – May 6

  10. Teacher Identification • Recruit and excite teachers • Recognize successful projects and invite participation • Share “Teacher Benefits” comments • Conduct interviews (pre-flection) SL Check Up Tool; ensure progress towards high quality service learning • Complete Teacher Identification Form • SLATE teachers email TIF to Partnership Coordinator (or designee)

  11. Choosing Standards • All teaching & projects aligned to standards • California State Content Standards that most directly align with the service-learning activity • Standards most important to school and LEA • Use district benchmarks • Use standards from district wide assessments • Focus on two content standards

  12. Student Assessments • Assumed all teachers collect data for standards achievement through assessing students • Meet & dialogue with SLATE teachers • Identify assessments being used • Discuss potential of comparison to district wide data • Discuss what defines proficient and non-proficient

  13. Student Tracking Form • Identify 2 Standards • Report whether students achieved proficiency (1) or not (0). • Track how many days project spanned (discuss this as a group so teachers include all days) • Record student attendance data • Double check each others Student Tracking Forms for accuracy • SLATE teachers email STF to Partnership Coordinator (or designee)

  14. SLATE Survey • Find time to meet as a team with SLATE teachers. • Bring completed STFs • Conduct SL Check Up Tool via dyad interview • Complete SLATE survey on PDF • SLATE teacher emails SLATE survey to Partnership Coordinator

  15. Reflection Ideas • Teacher reflections from 09-10 surveys • Perspectives on evaluation make a difference • Encourage curiosity and promote insights • Use data to promote team reflection • Provide time for teachers to share successes • Celebration activities

More Related