Download
validating the need for systemic change n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Validating the Need for Systemic Change PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Validating the Need for Systemic Change

Validating the Need for Systemic Change

203 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Validating the Need for Systemic Change

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Validating the Needfor Systemic Change Leaders of Learners March 27-28, 2013

  2. Scale Score Percent Correct Grade 8 Reading 1783 87% Level III (Advanced) 1700 75% Final Level II (2016 and beyond) 1637 65% Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) 1575 52% Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) STAAR Performance Standards Level III (Advanced) Well prepared for the next grade level or course Level II (Satisfactory) Sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course Level I (Unsatisfactory) Inadequately prepared for the next grade level or course

  3. Scale Score Percent Correct Algebra I 4333 78% Level III (Advanced) 4000 63% Final Level II (2016 and beyond) 3750 50% Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) 3500 37% Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) STAAR Performance Standards Level III (Advanced) Well prepared for the next grade level or course Level II (Satisfactory) Sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course Level I (Unsatisfactory) Inadequately prepared for the next grade level or course

  4. TAAS TAKS STAAR All tests, grades 3 – 8 and Reading 1 at Level II Final

  5. TAAS TAKS STAAR All tests, grades 3 – 8 and Algebra 1 at Level II Final

  6. Source: 2011-12 AEIS

  7. Source: 2011-12 AEIS

  8. Source: 2011-12 AEIS

  9. Projected 2013 District Performance, Accountability Index 4 Source: Moak Casey, based on 2012 AEIS

  10. 2015 Cohort EOC Retesting (Number of students remaining after December testing) 277 students must take one or more tests Failing scores on one or more tests

  11. Scale Score Percent Correct Algebra I 4333 78% Level III (Advanced) 4000 63% Final Level II (2016 and beyond) 3750 50% Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) 3500 37% Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) STAAR Performance Standards Phase-in

  12. Continuous improvement timeline Feb 2003 BISD enters ESC XI Continuous Improvement Consortium with Weatherford and Burleson ISDs Jul 2003 Jim Shipley CI overview training for principals Mar 2004 BISD Board Orientation Apr 2004 Board approves new goals/objectives, Graduate Profile Apr 2004 HEB and Decatur join consortium Jun 2004 District Department Team training Jun 2004 Campus Leadership Team training (Level I) Oct 2004 Teacher/Student Partnership Training Nov 2004 Campus Leadership Training (Level II) Jan 2005 Campus and Department Systems Checks

  13. Vertical/longitudinal thinking Eng III Eng II Eng I 2016 How will we ensure that our current 6th graders are well prepared for success at the next level? 8th 2015 7th 2014 6th 2013 SSI in 2016 5th Level II Phase-in 4th 3rd 2nd 2016 & beyond 1st How do we determine whether our kindergarten through grade 2 students are well prepared for success at the next level? 2014 & 2015 Final Kinder Phase 2 2012 & 2013 Phase 1

  14. Unsatisfactory 408 of 592 = 69% Level 2 (final): 1582 Tier 2: 1959 383 of 592 = 65%

  15. 3 3 5% 30% 2 2 20% 23% 1 1 75% 47% ISIP Grades K-8 January 2013 Recommended

  16. The moral imperative Ensure that all students are well prepared for success at the next level of learning This can only be accomplished by changing the learning system EOC