1 / 8

The forgetting of relation: towards a co-existential analytic

The forgetting of relation: towards a co-existential analytic. Paul Simpson Lecturer in Human Geography Plymouth University paul.simpson@plymouth.ac.uk. Overview. the relationship between method , methodology, and post-phenomenology

torin
Télécharger la présentation

The forgetting of relation: towards a co-existential analytic

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The forgetting of relation: towards a co-existential analytic Paul Simpson Lecturer in Human Geography Plymouth University paul.simpson@plymouth.ac.uk

  2. Overview • the relationship between method, methodology, and post-phenomenology • Questioning the status and nature of relationalityin post-phenomenology • Questioning the socio-political status of such an understanding of relationality.

  3. Methods, Methodology, and post-phenomenology • Questions raised about methods by theories of practice, new materialisms, relationality, non-representational theories, etc. as well as by post-phenomenologists • Need for new methods/techniques? • Video methods • Need to revised old methods/techniques? • Mobile methods • From concern with methods/techniques to a concern with a more general mode of analysis

  4. From being-there to being-with “Dasein has already revealed itself as being-with and reveals itself as such before any other explication” (p27)

  5. “thinking, absolutely and without reserve, beginning from the “with”, as the proper existence of one whose Being is nothing other than with-one-another” (Nancy 2000: 34).

  6. Nancy’s account of being-with “…does not altogether do justice to, or sufficiently account for, the way in which the sharing of being is unequally distributed or divided” (p49)

  7. Communitas Munus(noun): • Duty • Burden • Obligation • Gift “What holds us in common, or, better, what establishes us as beings-in-common, being-there-with, is that defect, that nonfulfillment, that debt” (Esposito 2013: 25).

  8. “The idea of immunity, which is needed for protecting our life, if carried past a certain threshold, winds up negating life. That is, immunity encages life such that not only is our freedom, but also the very meaning of our individual and collective existence lost: that flow of meaning, that encounter with existence outside of itself that I define with the term communitas, which refers to the constitutively open character of existence” (Esposito 2013: 61)

More Related