Download
teaching play to children with autism n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Teaching Play to Children with Autism PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Teaching Play to Children with Autism

Teaching Play to Children with Autism

804 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Teaching Play to Children with Autism

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Teaching Play to Children with Autism

  2. How Do Kids Learn to Play?(Weiss & Harris, 2001) • TD kids begin to imitate and are interested in other children even before turning 1 year old • Stages of Socialization in Play • Solitary Play – Child plays by self • Parallel Play – Child plays near another child, may show interest or occasionally exchange toys, but not really interactive • Associative Play – Several children are engaged in the same play and interact with one another. They share equipment or toys, but each child goes her own way • Cooperative Play – Children work together toward common goal or share a fantasy theme that requires mutual exchange to build scenario • Different pattern of development in kids with autism: • Repetitive and stereotyped play with toys • Difficulties learning imitation and learning through observation • Difficulties with pretend play

  3. Teaching Procedures for Promoting Play(Stahmer, Ingersoll, & Carter, 2003) • Discrete Trial Training • Break down skill and use massed trials; highly structured • Using Stereotypy • Perseverative themes are used to teach play • PRT • Clear instructions, child choice, interspersal, direct/naturalistic reinforcement, reinforcement of attempts, turn taking • Reciprocal Imitation Training (RIT) • Developed to teach spontaneous imitation, but has been shown to result in collateral pretend play and joint attention • Therapist imitates actions and vocalizations of the child, labels what he is doing, and then begins interspersing models and reinforcing imitation • http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1854885981808209926&q=%22joint+attention%22&total=13&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2 • DRA • Self-Management Training • Useful for teaching the child to play when he is alone • In Vivo Modeling, Video Modeling, and Play Scripts • http://www.neccautismplay.com/curriculum.html

  4. Pretend Play and Autism(Jarrold, 2003) • DSM-IV-TR criteria for autistic disorder • Under Communication domain…Lack of varied, spontaneous make-believe play or social imitative play appropriate to developmental level • Pretend Play: “using one object to stand for another or invoking the presence of nonexistent objects or object properties” (p. 385) • Why do children with autism not engage in pretend play? • They can’t? • It isn’t reinforcing? • Children of same age with MR engage in flexible pretend play • Some children with autism do engage in some pretend play on their own, but typically stereotypic • But are they really pretending? • Does pretending mean just the action of using materials to “stand in” for other materials? • Or does it require an “awareness” that nonexistent properties are represented? • One way to measure might be to assess novel pretend acts and different pretend acts with the same objects

  5. Peer Interactions & Play(Bass & Mulick, 2007; McConnell, 2006) • In free play situations, children with autism are more likely to • Play alone • Observe others from a distance • Engage in problem behavior • They DO interact with peers, but they • Make and receive fewer social initiations • Respond to fewer initiations • Engage in shorter bursts of interaction • Exhibit irregular eye contact • Inverse relation between a child’s rates of stereotypy/SIB and social interaction • Just putting children with more competent peers is not enough • Peers may misinterpret/ not reinforce/ may punish attempts at interaction • May result in further isolation for a child with autism • Using peers and siblings as “therapists” to initiate, prompt, and reinforce social interactions • Reduce dependence on adult prompts • Increase generalization • Doesn’t require additional phase of training • Natural and realistic models for language and behavior • You should arrange for this even if you don’t plan on using peers in your teaching!

  6. Peer Modeling • Peer serves as model for engaging in an inappropriate behavior • In vivo or video model • Target learner and peer sit in proximity to each other • Peer emits behavior (with or without teacher instruction) • Teacher may provide reinforcement for peer • Teacher prompts target learner to imitate behavior • Teacher reinforces correct response • Teacher fades prompts • Teacher differentially reinforces prompted and unprompted responses

  7. Peer Modeling with an Activity Schedule

  8. Peer Modeling with an Activity Schedule • Learner A has activity schedule in front of him or her with pages with pictures/text instruction of responses to engage in • Learner A turns to page 1, gets any necessary materials, and performs action on page 1 • Learner B gets any needed matching materials and imitates action • Teacher provides reinforcement for both learners – edible in cup or token • Learner A turns the page and models the next action • When the schedule is completed, learners switch roles between playing model and imitator • May incorporate learners delivering reinforcement for each other

  9. Bass & Mulick (2007) • Strain, Odom, Goldstein, and colleagues have developed a line of research on peer-mediated techniques • Protocol for training TD peers (“confederates”) • TD peers role play with adults until mastery • Adults model stereotypy and resistant behaviors typical of children with autism • Peers are taught to initiate, prompt, reinforce • Training conducted in the context of play activities in the natural environment • TD peers are prompted to interact with target children, activities, and materials • Visual cues (posters of skills) • TD peers receive reinforcement at first - systematically faded • Ringing bell, praise, happy face tokens (exchange for tangibles) • Increases in initiations and responses to initiations • Larger effects on responses • Limitations…

  10. Limitations of the Strain ProtocolBass & Mulick (2007) • Implementation is complex • Requires socially skilled TD peers • Adults must train peers, control reinforcement, and record data • Possible teacher-prompt dependency • Inconsistent results with generalization • Inability to increase more advanced social behavior • Most research on pre-school age children • No recent replications in today’s schools

  11. Strategies with “Preliminary Support”Bass & Mulick (2007) • Integrated Play Group (IPG) • Peer Buddy • Group-oriented Contingencies • Siblings as Change Agents

  12. Dave Kelly

  13. Developmental Play Assessment (Lifter, 2000)

  14. Developmental Play Assessment (Lifter, 2000)

  15. A Curriculum for Teaching Play(Weiss & Harris, 2001) • Toy Manipulation – Include more than 1 action with each object • 1 Step • 2 Step – both logical and illogical • Parallel Play – sit near someone else and play • Parent – same set of toys • Other child – start with different sets & preferred; later identical sets of toys • Video Modeling – should be able to imitate 1 step in vivo first; teach up to 3 step • Cooperative Play • Ball Play • Basic – teach to imitate different actions with different kinds of balls • With Receptive Commands • Reciprocal – rolling, kicking, throwing back and forth • Basic Sport Skills – make a basket • Play Stations – activity centers set up at different locations around a room • Art center, block center, animals/barn center, puzzles, train set • Start after 4-step imitation • Sustained Independent Play – Activity Schedules • Pretend Play…

  16. Pretend Play(Weiss & Harris, 2001) • Pretend Imitation • After 2-step imitation mastered • Choose objects that are interesting to child, but not objects that he only engages in stereotypy with • Teach 1 step pretend – some with objects and some without; move to 2, 3, 4 step • Pretend Receptive Actions • “Pretend you are ________” (e.g., sleeping, feeding the doll) • Have several objects available so child has to choose one • Teach 1 step and increase to multi-step • Pretend Representational Play • “Pretend this is a ____________” (e.g., the banana is a phone) • Pretend Joint Imaginary Play • “Let’s pretend that ______________” and child and you each have an equal role • Each sequence 4-8 min long and each person describes his activities as he goes along • Prompt with video, auditory, written scripts and/or pictures • Play Narration • Narrate the child’s play – “You play and I’ll tell a story” • Have the child narrate your play – “I’ll play and you tell a story” • Have the child narrate his own play – “You play and you tell a story” • Play flowchart…

  17. MacDonald et al. (2005) • Purpose – to evaluate effectiveness of video modeling in teaching long sequences of pretend play to children with autism • Participants – 2 boys with autism, ages 4 and 7 • Method • Toys – 3 sets with 7 objects/characters to manipulate (town, house, ship) • Scripts • Child was taught to manipulate and speak for characters • Each script had 16 scripts and 14 actions • Procedure • Baseline – given toys without video • Intervention • Child was shown video of adult playing with the toys and saying the script • 2 times consecutively • “It’s time to play” and brought child to materials for 4 min • No reinforcement or prompting • Mastery Probes – identical to baseline • Follow-up – maintenance after mastery without video; identical to baseline • Data collection – scripted and unscripted actions; scripted vocalizations • Design: Multiple Baseline Probe Design across play sets

  18. Ingersoll and Schreibman (2006) • Background • Relationship between imitation and development of language, play, and JA • Discrete trial format for teaching imitation – limitations? • Lack of generalization across therapists/settings??? • Response under control of “Do this” – what’s the proper stimulus control for imitating? • Imitation not automatically reinforcing • Not taught in natural context • Purpose – Evaluate effects of Reciprocal Imitation Training (RIT) on object imitation and collateral changes in language, pretend play, and JA • Participants – 5 children with autism ages 2-3, limited imitation in play • Setting • Training – floor of treatment room • Gen – different room • Materials • 5 sets of identical toys in each session – varied each session (total over 50) • “Based on child’s interest” • Gen – novel toys not used in tx • Design – MBD across participants • Eight 20-min sessions per week

  19. Ingersoll and Schreibman (2006) • Baseline • Therapist attempted to gain child attention and modeled action and verbal model with toy (about 1/min) • Familiar and novel actions; used toy child was and was not already engaged with • Action/verbal pair given up to 3 times • Verbal models varied across actions • No feedback • Gen probes – setting, materials, therapist • Treatment • 5 phases (2 weeks each phase) • Phase 1: No actions modeled • Phase 2: familiar actions modeled with same toy • Phase 3: familiar and novel actions with same toy • Phase 4: add familiar actions with different toy • Phase 5: familiar and novel actions with same and different toys • Naturalistic techniques • Contingent imitation – therapist imitated all child actions and vocs • Provided running commentary of child and therapist actions • Beginning in Phase 2, interspersed asking child to imitate • Reinforcement – praise and continued access to toy • Physical prompt after 3 models (followed by praise)

  20. Ingersoll and Schreibman (2006) • Post-treatment and 1-month follow-up: Identical to baseline • Three to five 10-min post-tx sessions • 3 generalization sessions • Treatment Integrity? • DVs • First 10-min of each session of the day and all gen sessions • %age of actions imitated • %age of intervals with language and joint attention– partial interval recording • Frequency of play • Pre and post assessments • IOA? • Social Validity?

  21. Ingersoll and Schreibman (2006)

  22. References • Bass, J.D., Mulick, J.A. (2007). Social play skill enhancement of children with autism using peers and siblings as therapists. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 727-735. • Ingersoll, B., Schreibman, L. (2006). Teaching reciprocal imitation skills to young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral approach: Effects on language, pretend play, and joint attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 487-505. • Jarrold, C. (2003). A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism, 7, 379-390. • Lifter, K. (2000). Linking assessment to intervention for children with developmental disabilities or at-risk for developmental delay: The developmental play assessment (DPA) instrument. In K. Gitlin-Weiner, A. Sandgrund, & C. Schafer (Eds.), Play diagnosis and assessment (2nd ed., pp 228-261). New York: John Wiley and Sons. • MacDonald, R., Clark, M., Garrigan, E., & Vangala, M. (2005). Using video modeling to teach pretend play to children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 225-238. • McConnell, S. R. (2006). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 351-413. • Stahmer, A.C., Ingersoll, B., & Carter, C. (2003). Behavioral approaches to promoting play. Autism, 7, 401-413. • Weiss, M.J., & Harris, S.L. (2001). Reaching out, joining in. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.