1 / 8

ProtégéRay: Advancing Ontology Development at Stanford Medical Informatics

ProtégéRay, part of the Stanford University School of Medicine, is a research initiative led by Mark Musen with a dedicated team of full-time staff and students. Our primary focus is on creating Protégé, an open-source Java tool for developing frame-based ontologies and knowledge bases, with over 6,000 registered users. We are funded by US Government grants and aim to enhance support for OWL through new developments, including a dedicated OWL backend. Our mission includes collaboration with the OWL community to improve editing environments and tackle current technical challenges.

traci
Télécharger la présentation

ProtégéRay: Advancing Ontology Development at Stanford Medical Informatics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ProtégéRay Fergerson • Who are we? • What have we done? • What are our plans? • Why are we here? • What are our problems? • Demo (?)

  2. Who are we? • Stanford Medical Informatics – part of the Stanford University School of Medicine • Research project led by Mark Musen • Comprise about a half-dozen full-time staff (2 programmers + researchers) + students • Funded primarily by US Government grants and contracts (NCI, NLM) • http://protege.stanford.edu

  3. What have we done? (1) • Built an free, open-source, extensible Java tool for developing and maintaining frame-based (OKBC) ontologies and knowledge-bases. • Not built-in support for rules, inference, classification, etc. • Acquired 6000 registered users, 1000 active users.

  4. What have we* done? (2) • A number our users have developed plug-ins including interfaces to rule-based systems, classification engines, etc (JESS, Prolog, FACT) • Developed plug-ins for visualization, ontology management (merging, etc) and PSMs • Built plug-ins to interface to XML Schema and RDFS • Worked with SRI to develop a DAML+OIL plug-in (in alpha)*and our users

  5. What are our plans? • We are (will be) funded by NCI to develop an OWL backend for Protégé. • We have hired a postdoc who will be devoted to this effort. • Our near-to-intermediate term goal is to provide good support for OWL-Lite, with eventual support for full OWL.

  6. Why are we here? • Create new disasters. (Find out how we can best work with the core OWL community to develop the best editing environment for OWL that we can.) • Understand more about some of the technical problems in the spec • Understand the plans/timeline for the spec • Better understand the OWL species • Encourage development of reference parser

  7. What are our problems? • “differentFrom” • Need OWL full for: • Allowed-values • Metaclasses • Allowed-parents • Cardinality

  8. Demo (?)

More Related