1 / 5

Integration

Integration. Eric Anderssen, LBNL May 11 2010. Scope of Review in March. Date 25-May (Tuesday) to avoid STAR opening This is not an integration review—it is the review of the IDS only

travis
Télécharger la présentation

Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integration Eric Anderssen, LBNL May 11 2010

  2. Scope of Review in March • Date 25-May (Tuesday) to avoid STAR opening • This is not an integration review—it is the review of the IDS only • Clearly a discussion of integration is required, but will attempt to limit details to those affecting the IDS • No details of MSC Mounted detectors will be discussed, only mass • SSD only discussed in terms of Service Burden/mass and layout • We are only making the WSC, but this defines diameter of OSC, and performance of IDS • The goal is to keep the review from being hijacked by detector detailed discussion.

  3. Crude Agenda • Overview of STAR Tracker Upgrade • Description of FGT and HFT; placement in STAR • Integration Description • Interfaces of IDS to STAR • Detector impacts on IDS (requirements pre-amble) • Requirements and Structural Performance • Description of requirements (e.g. sag, stability) • Performance, e.g. FEM • E-Field Shroud • Requirements (not discussion) • Performance analysis—proposed QC after production • Production Plan/Schedule • Tooling and procedures; QC description • Cost and Schedule (?) • Close-out

  4. Charge of Review • Are the interfaces well understood/presented? • Does the design meet performance requirements? • Subsets, e.g. e-field, stabililty, strength • Is the production plan proposed meet acceptable quality standards for BNL • Give us some direction on ‘Safety’ aspects that might impact design…

  5. Status of Integration • Documents are in E-room and actively being revised • Each of the sub-Detectors in the IDS has a document that is nearly complete • Contain Service Cross-sections, Mass of combined detector elements, and Stability Requirements • Discussion of Stability, Tolerance, Precision is complete, need to propagate to documents • Does not impact strongly IDS • Document which combines detector tables also in e-room, will update shortly

More Related