1 / 32

Mn/DOT– ACEC/MN Annual Consultant Conference

Mn/DOT– ACEC/MN Annual Consultant Conference. Overview. Background Defining the 50 Year Vision Mn /DOT’s Family of Plans The Visioning Process The Future. 2. Mn /DOT Strategic Vision.

trevet
Télécharger la présentation

Mn/DOT– ACEC/MN Annual Consultant Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mn/DOT– ACEC/MN Annual Consultant Conference

  2. Overview • Background • Defining the 50 Year Vision • Mn/DOT’s Family of Plans • The Visioning Process • The Future 2

  3. Mn/DOT Strategic Vision Global leader in transportation committed to upholding public needs and collaboration with internal and external partners to create a safe, efficient and sustainable transportation system for the future Supported by 5 Strategic Directions and 12 Flagship Initiatives 3

  4. Context: Modal Integration • Mn/DOT Flagship Initiative to: • Revise Mn/DOT’s organizational structure and planning/funding/programming processes to transition the department to a fully multimodal organization. 4

  5. Statewide Multimodal Planning • New Office Created February 2010 • Lead the development of the next Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan • Coordinate transportation planning efforts among modal offices, Districts, Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Regional Development Commissions • Develop policies and guidance to advance multimodal planning • Develop and articulate a long-term vision 5

  6. Defining the 50 Year Vision 6

  7. Visioning as a Planning Tool • Often used in strategic planning or for regional planning • Recently used in AZ, FL & OH for statewide transportation planning 7

  8. What is a Vision? • A description of a desired future • Answers the question “what are we trying to achieve?” • Does NOT answer the question “how will we do it?” • This will be addressed in subsequent statewide, modal, and regional planning efforts. 8

  9. 9

  10. Emerging Issues/Expectations • Quality of Life • Economic Competitiveness • Environmental Health • Fiscal Constraints 10

  11. Minnesota GO • A visioning process to: • Engage Minnesotans from all walks of life in both online and in-person activities to help craft a transportation vision for generations. • Better align the transportation system with what Minnesotan’s expect for their quality of life, economy, and natural environment. • Prioritize among the multiple goals, objectives, and expectations for the transportation system. 11

  12. Objectives • Establish a vision statement • Affirm existing or develop new principles for long-range policies and strategies • Highlight potential policies and strategies to be considered in the next Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan • Document public thinking on a range of issues affecting and affected by transportation in Minnesota 12

  13. Mn/DOT’s Family of Plans 13

  14. Plans, Plans, Plans … 14

  15. The Visioning Process Will Lead Directly Into The Next Statewide Multimodal Plan 15

  16. Family of Plans 16

  17. The Visioning Process 17

  18. Project Partners • Mn/DOT • University of Minnesota • Center for Transportation Studies • Humphrey Institute • Center for Integrative Leadership • Citizens League 18

  19. Minnesota GO Inputs 19

  20. Steering Committee • Purpose is to recommend to the Commissioner of Transportation: • A vision statement for transportation in Minnesota • A set of guiding principles/objectives for long-range transportation planning 20

  21. Advisory Groups (6 groups) • Advocates • Business • Health Care • Modal Representatives • Agriculture • Economic Development • Local Government • Freight • Philanthropy • Utilities • Unions • Trade Groups • Traditionally Underserved • Education • Etc. 21

  22. Advisory Group Structure 22

  23. Topic/Trend InterviewsVideo-taped interviews with U of M Faculty on 15 Different Topics • Energy • Demographics • Economy – Rural • Economy – Urban • Public Health • Water Quality • Air Quality • Climate • Global Trade/Supply Chains • Telework/Alternative Work Arrangements • Safety • Governance • Accessibility • Technology • Community Design 23

  24. Online Engagement • CitiZing.org • Early opportunities will shape public workshop content • Continue public workshop input after meetings 24

  25. Students Speak Out • Ongoing program of the Citizens League • High School Students – mostly peers engaging peers 25

  26. Public Workshops • Eight workshops throughout the state • Scenario Exercises • Additional 4 targeted outreach opportunities with groups traditionally underserved by planning processes 26

  27. Timeline 27

  28. The Future 28

  29. Minnesota GO: Data and Trend Informed not Based • Can’t anticipate transformational change • Focus is on establishing vision and guiding principles 29

  30. What “today” would you have planned for in 1980? • Internet and e-commerce were not in the picture • Prime rate was 15.26% • China was the US’s 24th ranked trading partner (below Switzerland) • AT&T had phone monopoly – there were no mobile phones • Technology adoption: • Microwaves were in just 14% of households • VCR’s in < 1% • PC’s were in none! • Communism was viewed as a stable economic system 30

  31. What Do You Think? 31

  32. THANK YOU mark.b.nelson@state.mn.us

More Related