140 likes | 270 Vues
The document outlines the financial execution plans for fiscal years 2001 and 2002, detailing order projections and actual performance across four quarters. It highlights key performance metrics, including the status of orders categorized as Red, Amber, and Green. Additionally, the report identifies root causes of production delays and outlines risk mitigation strategies aimed at improving quality assurance and operational efficiency. Emphasizing initiatives for classifying critical defects and enhancing quality assurance will aid in delivering safe and reliable ammunition on schedule.
E N D
1. Production Delinquencies Scott Welker
AMSOS-PR
(309) 782-7097
welkerd@osc.army.mil
2. 2 of 12
3. 3 of 12
4. 4 of 12
5. 5 of 12
6. 6 of 12
Start FY 01 and FY 02 Execution
7. 7 of 12
FY 02 Execution PlanProjections
1st Qtr: Plan to complete $91M in orders - $70M Amber, and $29M Green. Plan to go up $9M in Red. $68M in orders changed from Amber to Red.
1st Qtr Actuals: $M Red, $M Amber, and $M Green
2d Qtr: Plan to complete $178M in orders - $37M Red, $75M Amber, and $66M Green. $67M in orders change from Amber to Red.
2d Qtr Actuals:
3d Qtr: Plan to complete $233M in orders - $107M Red, $54M Amber, and $71M Green. $53M in orders change from Amber to Red.
3d Qtr Actuals:
4th Qtr: Plan to complete $195 in orders - $249M Amber, and $145M Green. Plan to go up $198M in Red. $245M in orders change from Amber to Red.
1st Qtr: Plan to complete $91M in orders - $70M Amber, and $29M Green. Plan to go up $9M in Red. $68M in orders changed from Amber to Red.
1st Qtr Actuals: $M Red, $M Amber, and $M Green
2d Qtr: Plan to complete $178M in orders - $37M Red, $75M Amber, and $66M Green. $67M in orders change from Amber to Red.
2d Qtr Actuals:
3d Qtr: Plan to complete $233M in orders - $107M Red, $54M Amber, and $71M Green. $53M in orders change from Amber to Red.
3d Qtr Actuals:
4th Qtr: Plan to complete $195 in orders - $249M Amber, and $145M Green. Plan to go up $198M in Red. $245M in orders change from Amber to Red.
8. 8 of 12
Delinquencies by Customer ($M) FY01 & Earlier Orders
9. 9 of 12
Distribution of Delinquent (Red) Programs ($296M)
10. 10 of 12
Root Causes Identified
11. 11 of 12
Risk Mitigation There are several Risk Mitigation Strategies.
1. Criticals Initiatives - to correctly classify Critical Defects, and to prevent the manufacturing of these Critical Defects.
2. System Initiatives - C T C (CTC) and other . Using more analysis
3. TDP Expectations - to clearly identifying to the certifying agency, what we expect when we receive a Certified Technical Data Package (TDP).
4. Program Risk Assessment - to providing analysis and recommendations on the most efficient use of the industrial complex to support goals and objectives for each ammunition commodity.
5. Quality Assurance (QA) Foundation - to establishing common policies and procedures; assure trained Headquarters and Plant Staff; establish clear expectations of Contractors , DCMA, and Installations; establish audit capability that is prevention-oriented, and grow our next generation of QA Specialists.
6. Program Reviews - to look at problems occurring during program execution, and assessing the impact of those problems on other programs that are being planned or executed.
7. Journey to Excellence - to identify Key Performance Characteristics of the item, and the Key Manufacturing Processes that will have an impact on performance; focus on Variation Reduction where it matters most; to reduce ammunition lot-to-lot and item-to-item variation to the point that ammunition has no contribution to Weapon System performance variation; and, to establish a disciplined process for decisions and lessons learned - making the information available and visible to all.
All of these Risk-Mitigating Strategies have the purpose of improving our ability to Deliver Safe Quality Ammunition On-Time.There are several Risk Mitigation Strategies.
1. Criticals Initiatives - to correctly classify Critical Defects, and to prevent the manufacturing of these Critical Defects.
2. System Initiatives - C T C (CTC) and other . Using more analysis
3. TDP Expectations - to clearly identifying to the certifying agency, what we expect when we receive a Certified Technical Data Package (TDP).
4. Program Risk Assessment - to providing analysis and recommendations on the most efficient use of the industrial complex to support goals and objectives for each ammunition commodity.
5. Quality Assurance (QA) Foundation - to establishing common policies and procedures; assure trained Headquarters and Plant Staff; establish clear expectations of Contractors , DCMA, and Installations; establish audit capability that is prevention-oriented, and grow our next generation of QA Specialists.
6. Program Reviews - to look at problems occurring during program execution, and assessing the impact of those problems on other programs that are being planned or executed.
7. Journey to Excellence - to identify Key Performance Characteristics of the item, and the Key Manufacturing Processes that will have an impact on performance; focus on Variation Reduction where it matters most; to reduce ammunition lot-to-lot and item-to-item variation to the point that ammunition has no contribution to Weapon System performance variation; and, to establish a disciplined process for decisions and lessons learned - making the information available and visible to all.
All of these Risk-Mitigating Strategies have the purpose of improving our ability to Deliver Safe Quality Ammunition On-Time.
12. 12 of 12
FY 02 Funds for Procurement of Ammunition by Service - $2,528,508DMA Portion by Service Approximately $851(in Millions)
13. Principal Delinquent DODICsAs Of 31 Dec 2001List represents 73% Undelivered Red Dollars
14. Principal Amber DODICsAs of 31 Dec 2001List Represents 82% of Undelivered Amber Dollars