1 / 1

Understanding NER300: Relevant and Ranking Costs in Renewable Energy Projects

The NER300 legislation outlines the financial framework for funding renewable energy projects through cost reimbursements. "Relevant cost" refers to the sum eligible for refund, capped at 50%, while "ranking cost" provides a basis for evaluating proposals, though it is not formally defined in NER300. This system allows for developer contributions and investment aid from member states, which can vary across relevant costs. Grants can cover up to 50% of these costs, along with operational and capital expenses, influencing the overall financial feasibility of projects.

trory
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding NER300: Relevant and Ranking Costs in Renewable Energy Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NER300.com “Relevant cost” and “ranking cost” “Relevant cost” is a term used in the NER300 legislation to determine the sum that NER300 can refund, up to 50% “Ranking cost” is not a term used in NER300, but means the basis for calculating cost as it is defined for the ranking of proposals. Developer contribution Investment aid from MS (from 0 to any %age of relevant costs allowable by State Aid) NER300 grant (from 0 to 50% of relevant costs) OPEX 5 yrs CAPEX Operating Benefit 5 yrs Value of market support schemes 5 yrs REF RELEVANT COSTS DEMO RANKING COSTS

More Related