1 / 5

Delegates:

To integrate or not to integrate? To better ensure meaningful science teaching and learning, which is the most promising approach between traditional and integrated (ex.:STEM, ESSTEEM or STSE)? March 23rd to 27th, 2012. Delegates:

tspaulding
Télécharger la présentation

Delegates:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To integrate or not to integrate? To better ensure meaningful science teaching and learning, which is the most promising approach between traditional and integrated (ex.:STEM, ESSTEEM or STSE)? March 23rd to 27th, 2012 Delegates: Erin Cameron, Christie McClure, Jean-Daniel Doucet, Huguette Thibeault, Wojceick Nawrocik, Han Chau, Robin St-Pierre, Éric Morissette, Dimitri Anastasopoulos, Brigitte Loiselle Moderator: Johanne Patry,

  2. ACRONYMS GALORE • STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics • ESSTEEM: Education in Science, Society, Technology, Engineering, Environment, and Mathematics) • STSE: Science, Technology, society, and Environment

  3. We observe that… • Educational programs separate and/or integrate different disciplines at the appropriate time • There exists a Common Framework in Canada • There is an increasing importance of connections between education and sustainable development • Complex problems are not included often in the classroom • From the secondary level and up, there are some places where there are teachers who do not have the expertise to teach science. • In some places, there are issues regarding math’s applications. • There is a need to improve disciplinary connections • There are problems in science perception • There is a lack of resources (materials, information, time, etc.)

  4. To better ensure meaningful science teaching and learning, which is the most promising approaches between traditional and integrated approaches (ex.: STEM, ESSTEEM or STSE)? The integratedapproachismostpromisingbecauseitresults in meaningful connections for the student and for the teacher We suggest • To expose students to the multiplicity of careersthrough connections in the classroomwithother disciplines • That specialization may start after 15-16 y.o. • That, even with the best curriculum, teachers need to be well prepared and be accompanied in the teaching process. • To have integrated based projects to offer to schools. • Ex.: Centre for the pedagogical development • Inquiry based projects/strategies • To offer attainable challenges for students and teacher

  5. To better ensure meaningful science teaching and learning, which is the most promising approaches between traditional and integrated approaches (ex.: STEM, ESSTEEM or STSE)? The integratedapproachismostpromisingbecauseitresults in meaningful connections for the student and for the teacher We suggest • To have more dialogue between math and science and at many levels • Professional development opportunities within school institutions that focus on science teaching where all levels of teachers are present • That there must be coherence in the curricula of different levels • Writing process should have math and science (plus many other disciplines) from different levels of representation • To support the ESSTEEM approach to provide a framework of teaching, learning, and project based problem solving (Education in Science, Society, Technology, Environment, Engineering, and Mathematics)

More Related