1 / 22

Fidelity

Fidelity. Leslie Connors, Principal Rachel Blum, NXGLC Teacher Bridget Blask, School Counselor. Why?. We believe that every child can be successful academically and behaviorally Wait…the school expectation is that all students must be successful!. Tier 1 Structure. Relationally.

tuari
Télécharger la présentation

Fidelity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fidelity Leslie Connors, Principal Rachel Blum, NXGLC Teacher Bridget Blask, School Counselor

  2. Why? • We believe that every child can be successful academically and behaviorally • Wait…the school expectation is that all students must be successful!

  3. Tier 1 Structure Relationally Academically Defined universal instruction school wide for both literacy and math to ensure fidelity Utilized the Common Core Standards as a basis for instruction, collaboration and assessment Developed unit plans in grade level teams measured every 5 weeks utilizing SMART goals Analyzed student work weekly to build consistency and understanding of grade level benchmarks Created a breakout session in reading and math to begin the process of sharing students to meet specific academic needs: K-3, 4-5 2013-2014 RTI leadership team will include representatives from each grade level, support staff, specialists and administrator • Adopted the TRIBES curriculum to create unity in the building • Created school-wide SMART agreements for universal Tier 1 using PBIS structure • Clearly defined MAJORS and MINORS • Designed Cool Tools to support teaching and re-teaching of expected behaviors • Encouraged POSITIVE behaviors through acknowledgement systems - SMART Roadrunner tickets and incentives • Team includes representatives from each grade level, support staff, specialists and administrator

  4. Tier 2 Structure PBIS Team Academic Team Includes representatives from each grade level, support staff, specialists and administrator Three-four student progress monitoring meetings held every Friday morning and once every five weeks for the entire five days of morning collaboration Team led with collaborative decision making • Includes two internal coaches, school counselor, support staff and administrator • Student progress monitoring meetings held as needed • Team led • Internal coaches oversee agendas/meetings, plans, and team implementation of PBIS initiatives

  5. Using Data in Tier 1 Behavior Data from SWIS Academic Data from MAP, Common Assessments and F&P levels Gives focus for systematic teaching at individual instructional levels Supports school-wide instruction of Common Core State Standards Helps determine which individual students need additional support beyond Tier One Shared with the entire staff at morning collaboration meetings to monitor growth, set purpose and focus staff development • Gives focus for systematic re-teaching and Cool Tools • Supports school-wide behavioral decisions and problem-solving • Helps determine which individual students need additional support beyond Tier 1 using Check-In, Check-Out • Shared with the entire staff at morning collaboration meetings for collaborative team planning to teach the needed skills

  6. SWIS Data • Data driven approach for identifying area(s) of need • David’s RTI Behavior Plan

  7. Check-in/Check-out (CICO) • Data driven approach for entering and exiting students David

  8. Academic Data • Data driven approach for identifying students for Tier 2 - Perla 3rd Grader – Fall Scores

  9. Using Data in Tier 2 Behavior Data Academic Data Identifies area of need based on specific strand of reading (or SLD criteria) to select appropriate Tier 2 intervention Assessments from Tier 1 carefully selected and instruction differentiated to the personalized learning plan to track progress over time Intervention data from Tier 2 tracked utilizing specific grade level probes documenting progress over time in addition to specific data from intervention (Wilson, LLI) • Gives area of focus based on the Big Five for Tier 2 intervention need • Check-In, Check-Out data continues to monitor progress • Functional behavioral assessment analyzed for more specific information

  10. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  11. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  12. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  13. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  14. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  15. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  16. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  17. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  18. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  19. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  20. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  21. Tier 2 Academic Case Study

  22. Franklin…… 2013-2014 Goals…. • Continue to refine the fidelity checks in Tier two reading and math interventions utilizing District resources • Continue to utilize reading and math breakout sessions as one vehicle to provide specific, personalized reading instruction or intervention for students • Continue to research for effective interventions for math problem solving • Offer more Tier two behavior interventions beyond CICO and including SAIG groups • Combine two school leadership teams (RTI and ILS) one time per month to reflect on best practices and adjust as needed • Focus on Tier One Writing instruction Fall semester using Lucy Calkin’s Kits • Offer Tier two writing interventions Spring semester

More Related