SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Re-Engineering the UK Internet Settlement Environment: Peering and Competition Insights

twila avatar
13 diapositives · 279 Views · Sep 24, 2014

This presentation by Keith Mitchell outlines the transformation of the UK settlement environment concerning Internet and voice telephony. It discusses the historical context of per-minute settlement practices, the emergence of competitive dial-up service providers, and the role of regulators like Oftel. The importance of ISPs maintaining peering policies is emphasized to enhance autonomy and market fairness. Additionally, the UK Internet Exchange (LINX) is highlighted as a key facilitator in promoting open peering and the benefits of self-regulation for ISP competition and collaboration.

Re-Engineering the UK Internet Settlement Environment: Peering and Competition Insights - slide 1
01 / 13Re-Engineering the UK Internet Settlement Environment: Peering and Competition Insights
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Re-Engineering the UK Internet Settlement Environment: Peering and Competition Insights
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. The Changing Settlement Environment Keith Mitchell keith@linx.net Executive Chairman, London Internet Exchange Re-Engineering the Internet, 27th Jan 1998

  2. Overview • UK Settlement Environment • Internet & Dial-up • Voice telephony • Internet Peering Environment

  3. Voice Telephony Settlement • Traditionally per-minute settlement from call originating carrier to terminating carrier

  4. UK ISP Dial-up • Local rate coverage needs 30-60 PoPs • OLOs introduced “vPoP” service for ISPs • Competition reduced prices, increased functionality • Some instances of call termination revenue PTTOLOISP

  5. Telecoms Regulation • UK Regulator Oftel • Tension between: • Former PTTs • Licenced telco ISPs • Unlicenced ISPs • Other “independent” unlicenced Service Providers (iSPs)

  6. Should ISPs setPeering Policy ? • In general, YES • key autonomy issue for ISP businesses • BUT: • may need to regulate players with significant market share • ideally take steps to avoid need to do this

  7. Peering Policy Principles • “Self-regulatory” measures: • Peering policies should be: • registered • in public domain • consistently & fairly implemented • stable

  8. LINX Background • LINX is UK national Internet Exchange Point • Represents 43 largest UK ISPs • Tries to encourage open peering and competition between ISPs • Does not “regulate” • Channel of communication between ISPs and regulators

  9. LINX Peering Environment • Restricted but published & well-defined membership criteria • Minimum of interference in member peering autonomy • Peering agreements private matter between members • Incentives to peer • Disincentives to not peer

  10. LINX Peering Practice (1) • Members must peer with >=20% of other members: • to remain member after 3 months • to acquire voting rights • may reduce and/or replace this “stick” with “carrot(s)”

  11. LINX Peering Practice (2) • Members must: • publish peering contacts • respond to peering requests within 2 days • Peering matrix on web page converts routing registry data into end-user friendly format

  12. Possible Peering Incentives • Additional membership status • Additional facilities • e.g. switch ports • access to VA services • Membership discounts

  13. Peering Conclusions • Open peering can promote competition • Closed bi-lateral exchange can inhibit it • Open peering arbiter can facilitate competition: • as L1/L2 exchange • as organisational environment