1 / 18

Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC

Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC. Areawide vs. Site Specific Approach. Sites viewed in context with others, not individually Data can be shared, eliminating redundancy Co-mingling issues more easily resolved

tyanne
Télécharger la présentation

Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC

  2. Areawide vs. Site Specific Approach • Sites viewed in context with others, not individually • Data can be shared, eliminating redundancy • Co-mingling issues more easily resolved • Variability of scale allows new information to emerge

  3. For ADEC • Map site locations • Determine site status (open, closed, how much work is needed) • Identify preliminary data gaps • Identify PRPs • Possibly involved in data collection, investigation, coordination, cleanup if necessary

  4. Fairbanks Areawides

  5. Common ADEC Requirements for All Responsible Parties • Delineate nature and extent (18 AAC 75.335) • Evaluate risk to current and future land users • Protection of current & future land users through ICs • Cleanup and management plans • Consistent and compatible reporting for purposes of information dissemination Proactive and solution oriented

  6. 1) Delineate contamination • Identify all possible sources and COCs • Identify conditions that could result in ongoing releases (buried piping, tanks, abandoned injection wells, etc.) • Delineate extent of contaminants in soil and groundwater (on and off-property) Long-term monitoring necessary to monitor groundwater quality

  7. FAIR Coordinated Sampling • Spring Sampling – 3rd week in April • Fall Sampling – 3rd week in September • Common benchmark for groundwater elevation Problems • Shared groundwater data (EDDs) • Shared reporting (currently handled by DEC)

  8. FAIR Coordinated Sampling GeneralResults • Product present on every site • Dissolved Benzene/GRO at highest concentrations at southern end • DRO/RRO throughout area • Off-site delineation not complete

  9. 2) Evaluate Risk • FAIR Risk Management Zones – Commercial/Industrial • CSM needed for this area • Hydrogeologic characteristics • Contaminant location and transport characteristics • Possible Exposure Pathways • Are there risks to human health or the environment that need to be controlled or mitigated? • Wells or dewatering activities? • Indoor air quality problems? Risks should be mitigated through cleanup or risk management

  10. FAIR Risk Management Plan

  11. Risk Management Zones

  12. 3) Cleanup and Management Plan • What are the site-specific requirements? • Control risk • Remove source/product • Reduce the life of the plume and long-term monitoring requirements (flexible) • Compatible with the land owner needs? • Schedule? Plan should balance cleanup and management options with expected site use and cost considerations

  13. 4) Institutional Controls • Necessary now – not later • Better long-term management of contamination is priority for DEC • IC plan should be coordinated with Railroad • RP will continue to be responsible when utilities or other parties encounter contamination • Compliance review is necessary If managed properly, contamination shouldNOTprevent property transactions or reuse

  14. Construction Projects: • Balloon Tracks • Minnie Street Connector • Illinois Street Widening

  15. 5) Information Management • Must be able to articulate useful information to the public regarding contaminated sites • In order to clarify potential liability considerations • Reduce economic impacts - adjacent and future property use/sale/development • Must know extent of impacts • Plume maps • Estimated areas of soil contamination

  16. Summary • Delineate • CSM/Risk Evaluation • IC Plan • Cleanup and Management Plan

  17. Milestones • ADEC send letter requesting CSM and explanation • Need information on downgradient MSLUG wells (ADEC) • Contaminated site map with addresses – provide CIMMS website (ADEC) • Workplan (provide schedule or work) – May 30 • Need entry permit from railroad for drilling or sampling on railroad party • Need letter of consent from tenants • Off-site delineation (characterization) • Preliminary CSM – Characterization report • Wells, surface soil exposure, indoor air issues? • Groundwater sampling (third week April 2005) • Product sample from Chevron and Railroad • Look into common lab – • Coordinate sampling protocol (document that this will happen in the workplan) • Share data for interpretation by each party • Janice – ADEC contact

  18. FAIR – Solvents at North End (HIDE)

More Related