200 likes | 306 Vues
This report summarizes the TEMPUS project CD JEP 16160, initiated in 2001, aimed at reorganizing Computer Science studies at FSMN. Key achievements include updates in course syllabi, the introduction of new subjects such as Information Technologies and Business Informatics, and the enhancement of teaching materials through multimedia and new equipment. The project also involved collaboration and retraining of staff with partner institutions. Future developments hinge on the adoption of a new university law in 2005 and the completion of a thorough review of the proposed curricula.
E N D
Implementation of Innovations atFSMN 2002 - 2005 by Miroslav Ćirić & Predrag Krtolica
Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion
Short History • 3 years ago TEMPUS project CD JEP 16160 – 2001 was started. • We planed to reorganize our CS studies only in few subjects. • This includes: • changes in some subjects syllabi, • introducing new subjects, • producing the supporting material, • purchasing equipment, and • staff retraining.
Short History • So far, we have reorganized courses in Data Structures & Data Bases and Computer Systems. • Also we have introduced new courses in: • Information Technologies, • Intagrated Software Packages, • Informatics Didactics, • Security and Cryptography, • Business Informatics.
Short History • Lecture presentations and/or teaching material are posed at faculty WEB site for a number of subjects: • Data Structures & Data Bases, • Computer Systems, • Operating Systems, • Parallel processing, • Integrated Software Packages, • Mathematical Logic, • Languages and Automata, etc.
Short History • Most of teachers use multimedia now. • Purchased equipment • 5 PCs, • 1 LJ printer, • 1 photocopy machine, • 1 binding machine, and • a number of books. • Before the end of project we will purchase 5 more PCs. • Equipment is used for preparing teaching material.
Short History • We have performed a number of short visits to the partner institutions including the retraining of teaching staff. • Exchanging the experiences and information about curricula in partner institutions was of the crucial importance!
Short History • Meanwhile, we realized that we need completely new studies. • At TEMPUS meeting in Ohrid (September, 2004) we have presented new curricula proposal in first version. • We have also promised to inform you about future progress. • Important circumstance: new university law is about to be adopted in spring 2005.
Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion
Principles • We follow recommended area according to CC2001. • Subject are designed pretty much on our own. • We have defined forest of the subject precedence with list of compulsory and elective subjects.
Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion
Subjects • In the following list we present subjects allocated in the earliest semesters when they can be taken. • Also, we marked compulsories and electives. • Hypothetic modules of electives are defined too, but they would not be imposed to the students and they are not marked in the following list.
Compulsory at introductory level Subjects – First Year
Subjects – Second Year Compulsory at introductory level Compulsory at intermediate level Advanced level electives
Subjects – Third Year Compulsory at intermediate level Compulsory at advanced level Advanced level electives
Subjects – Forth Year Advanced level electives Compulsory at advanced level
Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion
Open Questions • We need final recheck of the proposal before put it in the procedure. • Credits! Very important but still not quite clear.
Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion
Conclusion • Earlier law limitations apparently will be removed sun. • This make local acceptance more probable. • We can not be very wrong. This curricula should not last more then 5 years.